Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 1026  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::Related articles
 ::  Article in PDF (163 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  Abstract
 ::  Materials and Me...
 ::  Results
 ::  Discussion
 ::  References
 ::  Article Figures
 ::  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed6283    
    Printed161    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded338    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 9    

Recommend this journal


 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 55  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 17-21

Detection rate of prostate cancer using prostate specific antigen in patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms: A retrospective study


1 Department of Biochemistry, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai-400 022, India
2 Department of Urology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai-400 022, India

Date of Submission07-May-2007
Date of Decision20-Oct-2008
Date of Acceptance20-Oct-2008
Date of Web Publication24-Feb-2009

Correspondence Address:
P R Chavan
Department of Biochemistry, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai-400 022
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.43548

Rights and Permissions


 :: Abstract 

Background: Need for undertaking prostate biopsies for detection of prostate cancer is often decided on the basis of serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA). Aim: To evaluate the case detection rate of prostate cancer among patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) on the basis of PSA levels and to assess the scope of prostate biopsy in these patients. Setting and Design: A retrospective study from a tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: The clinical and histopathological data of 922 patients presenting with LUTS in the last five years was obtained from the medical record section. They had been screened for prostate cancer using PSA and /or digital rectal examination examination followed by confirmation with prostate biopsy. Statistical Analysis Used: Detection rate and receiver operating characteristic curve were performed using SPSS 16 and Medcalc softwares. Results: The detection rate of prostate cancer according to the PSA levels was 0.6%, 2.3%, 2.5%, 34.1% and 54.9% in the PSA range of 0-4, 4-10, 10-20, 20-50 and >50 ng/ml, respectively. Maximum prostate cancer cases were detected beyond a PSA value of 20 ng/ml whereas no significant difference in the detection rate was observed in the PSA range of 0-4, 4-10 and 10-20 ng/ml. Conclusion: A low detection rate of prostate cancer observed in the PSA range of 4-20 ng/ml in LUTS patients indicates the need for use of higher cutoff values of PSA in such cases. Therefore we recommend a cutoff of 20 ng/ml of PSA for evaluation of detection rate of prostate cancer among patients presenting with LUTS.


Keywords: Detection rate, lower urinary tract symptoms, prostate specific antigen, prostate cancer


How to cite this article:
Chavan P R, Chavan S V, Chavan N R, Trivedi V D. Detection rate of prostate cancer using prostate specific antigen in patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms: A retrospective study. J Postgrad Med 2009;55:17-21

How to cite this URL:
Chavan P R, Chavan S V, Chavan N R, Trivedi V D. Detection rate of prostate cancer using prostate specific antigen in patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms: A retrospective study. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2009 [cited 2019 Aug 19];55:17-21. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2009/55/1/17/43548


Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men and is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. [1] Many men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are screened for prostate cancer with prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing and a digital rectal examination (DRE) as a part of a routine prostate assessment. There is general agreement among clinicians that the PSA test has the highest predictive value for prostate cancer as compared to DRE or trans-rectal ultrasound sonography (TRUS) alone. [2],[3] Hence, patients with LUTS who have PSA levels higher than 4 ng/ml are advised to undergo prostate biopsy to rule out cancer. [4]

The PSA-based prostate cancer detection is fraught with high false-positive rate. Many confounding variables such as benign prostate hyperplasia, inflammation/ infection or traumatic maneuvers of the prostate gland influences serum PSA levels leading to many unnecessary biopsies.

Unlike Western countries, in India, the use of serum PSA in routine screening of men above 50 years age for prostate cancer is rare. However, this strategy is frequently used in the presence of LUTS. As data regarding the utility of serum PSA in detection rate of prostate cancer in asymptomatic or symptomatic men presenting with LUTS in the Indian population is still lacking, we undertook a study to evaluate the case detection rate of prostate cancer using PSA in patients presenting with LUTS and to assess the scope of prostate biopsy in patients presenting with abnormal PSA levels (>4 ng/ml).


 :: Materials and Methods Top


In this retrospective study, clinical and histological data of patients presenting with LUTS attending the outpatient clinic at the tertiary teaching hospital over a period of five years was retrieved from the medical record section by one of the contributing authors. The ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional ethics committee.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Men above 40 years of age presenting with LUTS specifically attributed to prostate problems were included in the study. From the registry the data collected showed 922 cases of LUTS over the period of five years. The data obtained included demographic details, clinical findings and assessment of LUTS as per the seven-item American Urological Association Symptoms Index (AUA- SI). [5],[6] Responses to these seven items were summed up to produce an overall score (0-35). Standardized classification of symptoms severity as given by Barry et al., [6] was applied to designate the symptoms as mild (0-7), moderate (8-19) or severe (> 20).

Men with LUTS caused by any urological malignancy other than prostate, those who had previous prostatic surgery or pelvic radiotherapy or complications of urinary obstruction (due to bladder stones, renal failure, recurrent urinary tract infection or residual urinary volumes >200 ml) were excluded from the study.

Serum PSA and DRE

Reports of serum PSA levels by ELISA (Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay kit, Diagnostic System Laboratories)and findings of systematic DRE performed by the attending urologist were noted. The prostate was regarded as abnormal on DRE, if there was evidence of nodularity, indurations, asymmetry or absence of the median sulcus. As a routine practice DRE examination was scheduled after collection of blood sample to avoid an increase in serum PSA that may follow digital manipulation of the gland. PSA levels less than 4ng/ml were considered as normal, those between 4-10 ng/ml as diagnostic gray zone and above 10 ng/ml as indicative of cancer. Other routine investigations like renal profile, blood sugar, complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, urine routine and culture were also performed.

Prostate biopsy

The results of prostate biopsies that were performed on patients with abnormal DRE examination and/ or serum PSA levels >4 ng/ml were also noted. As per the then institutional practice, the prostate was mapped by systematic sextant TRUS-guided biopsies using an 18-gauge True-Cut, 20-cm long needle driven by a spring-loaded gun (Magnum Bard Biopsy Instruments) with a cutting length of 22 mm. The biopsies were taken at the apex, middle and base of the right and left lobes in the para-sagittal plane. If a hypoechoic lesion was detected in the peripheral or central zone on TRUS, additional three to six biopsies of that area were also taken in order to avoid the exclusion of carcinoma outside this locus. Since patients with prostatitis presenting with high PSA levels may show a significant decline after six weeks of antibiotic treatment, serum PSA levels were re-ordered in such patients. Subsequently, patients with sustained high PSA levels after the follow-up of six weeks were subjected to a confirmatory biopsy as deemed necessary.

A team of histopathologists including a dedicated genitourinary pathologist of senior faculty level reviewed all biopsies.

Based on clinical and histopathogical diagnoses the patients presenting with LUTS were categorized into two groups: Group I, Prostate cancer and Group II, non-malignant group (benign prostate hyperplasia with or without prostatitis). In specimens diagnosed as prostate cancer additional review was performed by the Gleason Score. [7]

Statistical evaluation

Data were analyzed using the statistical software packages SPSS 16 and Medcalc for windows.

Detection rate was calculated as percentage of cases with prostate cancer among patients presenting with LUTS. For comparison of serum PSA levels between non-malignant and malignant group unpaired t test was used. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed for assessing the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value at various serum PSA cutoff values for detection of prostate cancer. P <0.05 was considered significant.


 :: Results Top


In this study, 922 patients (age range of 40-95 years) presenting with LUTS were screened for prostate malignancy. The demographic features are mentioned in [Table 1]. Based on abnormal DRE findings and/ or high PSA levels, 440 patients underwent prostate biopsy. Of these cases, 80 cases were diagnosed to have prostate cancer, the rest showed non-malignant conditions (n=842). Thus, the detection rate of prostate cancer among LUTS cases observed was 8.7% irrespective of their PSA values.

DRE examination revealed abnormalities in 158 (17.1%) subjects. The relationship between the number of subjects with abnormal DRE findings and their PSA levels is shown in [Table 2]. As the PSA levels increased the number of prostate cancer cases detected by DRE also increased.

The mean and standard deviation of PSA levels observed among the malignant and non-malignant group were 267.9 558.1 and 14.5 54.4 respectively. On comparison, the PSA levels observed in the prostate cancer group were significantly (t=12.6, df=920 P = <0.001) higher than the non-malignant group. Mean difference observed was -253 20.08 with 95% confidence interval of -292.6 to -213.9.

[Table 2] shows the detection of prostate cancer at various PSA ranges. It can be seen that the percentage of subjects diagnosed to have prostate cancer increased with rising levels of PSA. However, the detection rate of prostate cancer observed in the PSA range of 0-4 (0.61%), 4-10 (2.34%) and 10-20 (2.54%) ng/ml remains almost similar. The maximum number of prostate cancer cases was detected beyond 20 ng/ml of PSA level.

We performed ROC curve analysis in patients with malignant and non-malignant conditions for the complete serum PSA range (0.01-3849 ng/ml). When the entire PSA range was considered, area under curve observed was 0.938 ( P <0.001) with 95% confidence interval of 0.910- 0.965 [Figure 1]. The diagnostic validity criteria such as the sensitivity, specificity at different decision limits of the ROC curve is shown in [Table 3]. As can be seen from this Table, with the upward trend of PSA cutoff value the specificity showed significant improvement whereas the sensitivity showed marginal decline.

In this study, according to histological findings, Gleason score observed in the prostate cancer patients was in the range of 2-9. No malignant case was observed with Gleason Score 1 and 10. The distribution of patients was 2.5%, 5%, 11.3%, 12.5%, 18.8%, 31.3%, 12.5%, and 6.3% in Gleason Score 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, respectively.


 :: Discussion Top


The low incidence of prostate cancer, lack of awareness about the disease and availability of limited resources preclude institution of a screening program for its detection in a country like India. In addition, recommendations regarding the appropriate level of PSA for undertaking diagnostic biopsy have been changing over time. Our study has established that the cancer detection rates at PSA levels 0-4, 4-10 and 10-20 ng/ml are low and do not vary significantly. The study findings also indicate that a serum PSA cutoff value of over 20 ng/ml provides optimal levels of sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for detection of prostatic cancer in patients with LUTS.

It is well established that with the increase in serum PSA levels the detection rate of prostate cancer also increases. The probability of detecting prostate cancer in the range of 4-10 ng/ml is around 25% which increases to more than 30% with serum PSA level above 10 ng/ml. [8],[9] Our analysis demonstrated detection rate of 0.6%, 2.3%,2.5% and 34.1% in the PSA range of <4,4-10,10-20 and 20-50 ng/ml. According to international literature American men have higher detection rate of prostate cancer than Asian men. [10],[11],[12] In Korean men the prostate cancer detection rate observed with PSA <4 ng/ml or between 4-10ng/ml was 13.8% and 15.95. [11] This is similar to the 15.8% rate in Japanese men reported by Egawa et al ., [12] Our study demonstrated a still lower detection rate of prostate cancer as compared to our Asian counterparts i.e. the Koreans or Japanese. Worldwide the incidence of prostate cancer is observed to be varying widely, with Americans showing the highest incidence and Asian men showing the lowest incidence. This variation in the incidence may in part be explained by dietary habits and the racial differences. Also, the high detection rates observed in the Western population may be contributed to an intense screening procedure. In the same vein, in the Indian scenario, lack of awareness, education and facilities for routine health checkups seem to be the main factors contributing to the low detection rates reported hitherto.

A report about Korean men demonstrated that a serum PSA level greater than or equal to 20 ng/ml, independent of DRE findings was 81% accurate in predicting the presence of prostate cancer on initial biopsy. [13] Similarly, studies by Gerstenbluth et al., demonstrated that a serum PSA level of 20 ng/ml or greater, independent of DRE findings was 87.2% accurate in predicting the cancer and a serum PSA level of 50 ng/ml or greater had a positive predictive value of 98.5%. [14] Our data showed 80.6% accuracy in detection of prostate cancer at the PSA cutoff of 10 ng/ml whereas at 20 ng/ml 91.3% specificity was observed. The need for detection rate and the accuracy of cutoff value is important in counseling the patients for the chances of positive finding prior to the biopsy.

It appears that the recently advocated PSA cutoff value of 2.5 ng/ml for recommending prostate biopsies would result in many Indian patients unnecessarily undergoing the procedure.

Although the prostate cancer detection rate of 8.7% observed in our study is far higher than those reported in other surveys, [8],[15] it is lower than the rate of 14.6% reported by Cooner et al ., [9] in clinical urological practice using PSA, DRE and prostate ultrasonography. The higher rate in our study could be attributed to the fact that ours was a "super-selected" set of symptomatic patients attending a referral urological center, while the surveys were carried out in population-based screening programs or hospital-based screening programs. A multi-centric study in Korean men reported a detection rate of 32.7% of the 4967 men undergoing biopsy for detection of prostate cancer. Further interpretation revealed that 19.6% of subjects with PSA levels between 4 and 9.9 ng/ml were diagnosed with cancer, whereas 53.7% were diagnosed at PSA levels greater than 10 ng/ml. [16]

Histologically acute and chronic-active prostatitis is considered an important factor for inducing the high increase in serum PSA values via the leak phenomenon, [17] which causes confusion in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. [18] However, patients with high PSA levels showing significant decline in their PSA level after six weeks of antibiotic treatment for prostatitis is often considered as confirmation for absence of prostate cancer.

Our study is limited by the following factors. Firstly, being a retrospective study use of more specific forms of PSA such as PSA velocity, PSA density, age-specific PSA reference range, the measurement of free - PSA%, free to total PSA ratio, and complexed PSA which are being used lately could not be utilized. In the event that these were adopted, the positive predictive value of the PSA test would have further increased thus altering the scope of biopsy in case detection. Yet till date basic serum PSA levels determination remains the test of choice widely available and universally accepted not only in many centers in India but all over the world. Despite all these our study becomes relevant specifically as LUTS patients shows higher serum PSA levels in whom the standard normal range of 0-4 ng/ml cannot be applied. This necessitates a higher cutoff level (at 20 ng/ml), which shows more accurate detection rate for prostate cancer.

The study could also be scrutinized critically for using PSA range of 0-4 ng/ml, when the literature is recommending 2.5 ng/ml as the cutoff level. It may be stated that most Indian centers still use 4 ng/ml as the cut-off level and convincing Indian data that would support the cutoff level of 2.5 ng/ml is still lacking. As can be made out from the findings, even the adoption of a cutoff level of 2.5 ng/ml would not have affected the outcome of our study. The third limitation of our study points to the use of sextant biopsies instead of the current norm of 10-12 core biopsies. We were limited in this regard by the retrospective nature of the study design dating back to as early as 2001 wherein the practice of 12 core biopsies was still not in vogue. The execution of a more extensive biopsy regimen would have positively impacted the case detection rate.

Lastly, the retrospective nature of the study once again eliminated the scope for any longitudinal follow-up. The follow-up could have allowed for serial determination of PSA estimations and enhanced case detection. Despite the above mentioned limitations, the detection rate of prostate cancer reported in this study offers a compelling and stimulating insight into the need for more stringent and thorough investigation of all cases of LUTS in order to maximize detection. The cutoff value of PSA recommended i.e. 20 ng/ml in this study is particularly for a select group of patients presenting with LUTS attending the urology out patient department and not for the general population or for screening purpose. In conclusion the applicability of the proposed PSA cutoff for detection of prostate cancer in patients presenting with LUTS needs to be prospectively studied using more sample size of such patients.

 
 :: References Top

1.Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ. Cancer Statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:5-26. 2  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
2.Mistry K, Cable G. Meta-analysis of prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination as screening tests for prostate carcinoma. J Am Board Fam Pract 2003;16:95-101.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
3.Martinez de Hurtado J, Chιchile Toniolo G, Villavicencio Mavrich H. The digital rectal exam, prostate-specific antigen and transrectal echography in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer. Arch Esp Urol 1995;48:247-59.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Crawford ED, Leewansangtong S, Goktas S, Holthaus K, Baier M. Efficiency of prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in screening, using 4.0 ng/ml and age-specific reference range as a cutoff for abnormal values. Prostate 1999;38:296-302.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O' leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, et al . The American Urological Association Symptoms index for benign prostatic Hyperplasia: The measurement committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 1992;148:1549-57.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Lawrence K. Measurement properties of the AUA symptom score: A methodological clarification. Br J Urol 1996;77:175-80.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Gleason DF. Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer Chemother Rep 1966;50:125-8.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, Hudson MA, Scardinoa PT, Flanigan RC, et al . Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: Results of a multicentre clinical trial of 6630 men. J Urol 1994;151:1283-90.   Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford CL Jr, Beard JH, Pond HS, Terry WJ, et al . Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol 1990;143:1146-52.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  
10.Ku JH. Race-Specific reference ranges of serum prostate-specific antigen levels in countries with a low incidence of prostate cancer. BJU Int 2006;97:69-72.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
11.YangWJ, Lee DH, Chung BH, Cho JS, Choi YD, Kim SJ, et al . Detection rate of prostate cancer on biopsy according to serum prostate - specific antigen in Korean men: a multicenter study. Urology 2006;67:333-6.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Egawa S. Matsumoto K, Yoshida K, Iwamura M, Kuwao S, Koshiba K. Results of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies and clinical significance of Japanese prostate cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1998;28:666-72.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Shim HB, Lee SE, Park HK, Ku JH. Accuracy of high prostate-specific antigen level for prostate cancer diagnosis upon initial biopsy in Korean men. Yonsei Med J 2007;48:678-83.   Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
14.Gerstenbluth RE, Seftel AD, Hampel N, Oefelein MG, Resnick MI. The accuracy of increased prostate - specific antigen level (greater than or equal to 20 ng/ml) in predicting prostate cancer: Is biopsy always required? J Urol 2002;168:1990-3.   Back to cited text no. 14  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
15.Schroder FH, van der Maas PV, Beemsterboer P, Kruger AB, Hoedemaeker R Rietbergen J, et al . Evaluation of the digital rectal examination as a screening test for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Institute 1998;90:1817-23.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Seo HK, Chung MK, Ryu SB, Lee KH; Korean Urological Oncologic Society Prostate Cancer Study Group. Detection rate of prostate cancer according to prostate - specific antigen and digital rectal examination in Korean men: A nation wide multicenter study. Urology 2007;70:1109-12.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
17.Hasui Y, Marutsuka K, Asada Y, Ide H, Nishi S, Osada Y. Relationship between serum prostate specific antigen and histological prostatitis in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate 1994;25:91-6.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Neal DE Jr, Clejan S, Sarma D, Moon TD. Prostate specific antigen and Prostatitis I Effect of prostatitis on serum PSA in the human and non human primate. Prostate 1992;20:105-11.  Back to cited text no. 18  [PUBMED]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Triptorelin in the Relief of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients: The RESULT Study
Alexandre Peltier,Fouad Aoun,Vincent De Ruyter,Patrick Cabri,Roland Van Velthoven
Prostate Cancer. 2015; 2015: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Impact of lower urinary tract symptoms on prostate cancer risk among Japanese men with prostate-specific antigen <10?ng/mL and non-suspicious digital rectal examination
Masaya Ito,Hitoshi Masuda,Satoru Kawakami,Yasuhisa Fujii,Fumitaka Koga,Kazutaka Saito,Shinya Yamamoto,Junji Yonese,Iwao Fukui,Kazunori Kihara
International Journal of Urology. 2013; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Is there any association between the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms and the risk of biopsy-detectable prostate cancer in patients with PSA level below 20 ng/ml in multi-core prostate biopsy?
Oh, J.J. and Jeong, S.J. and Jeong, C.W. and Byun, S.-S. and Hong, S.K. and Choe, G. and Lee, S.E.
Prostate. 2013; 73(1): 42-47
[Pubmed]
4 Is there any association between the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms and the risk of biopsy-detectable prostate cancer in patients with PSA level below 20 ng/ml in multi-core prostate biopsy?
Jong Jin Oh, Seong Jin Jeong, Chang Wook Jeong, Seok-Soo Byun, Sung Kyu Hong, Gheeyoung Choe, Sang Eun Lee
The Prostate. 2012; : n/a
[VIEW] | [DOI]
5 Is there an optimal prostate-specific antigen threshold for prostate biopsy?
Carsten Stephan, Kurt Miller, Klaus Jung
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy. 2011; 11(8): 1215
[VIEW] | [DOI]
6 A pilot study on the use of serum glyoxalase as a supplemental biomarker to predict malignant cases of the prostate in the PSA range of 4-20 ng/ml
Chavan, S.V. and Chavan, N.R. and Balaji, A. and Trivedi, V.D. and Chavan, P.R.
Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2011; 134(10): 458-462
[Pubmed]
7 Prostate biopsy findings in Indian men: A hospital-based study
Sinha, S. and Siriguri, S.R. and Kanakmedala, S.K. and Bikkasani, K.
Indian Journal of Cancer. 2011; 48(2): 175-180
[Pubmed]
8 Genetic variants in the distal enhancer region of the PSA gene and their implication in the occurrence of advanced prostate cancer
Chavan, S.V. and Maitra, A. and Roy, N. and Patwardhan, S. and Chavan, P.R.
Molecular Medicine Reports. 2010; 3(5): 837-843
[Pubmed]
9 Cut-off value for PSA: Do we need a change
Singh, J.C.
Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. 2009; 55(2): 150-151
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow