Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 109  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::  [PDF Not available] *
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  Acknowledgements
 ::  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1464    
    Printed58    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


 


 
ARTICLE
Year : 1977  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 50-52

Drug protein binding: Relevance to treatment


Department of Pharmacology/Clinical Pharmacology, Seth G. S. Medical College, Parel, Bombay-400012, India

Correspondence Address:
Nilima A Kshirsagar
Department of Pharmacology/Clinical Pharmacology, Seth G. S. Medical College, Parel, Bombay-400012
India
Login to access the Email id


PMID: 614414

Get Permissions




How to cite this article:
Kshirsagar NA, Sheth U K. Drug protein binding: Relevance to treatment. J Postgrad Med 1977;23:50-2

How to cite this URL:
Kshirsagar NA, Sheth U K. Drug protein binding: Relevance to treatment. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 1977 [cited 2014 Jul 30];23:50-2. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?1977/23/2/50/42794


Drug protein binding has attracted the attention of many investigators. The re­cognition or presumption of importance of protein binding and the ease of measur­ing drug protein interactions have led to accumulation of extensive literature in this field. This literature should be eva­luated however from the point of clinical relevance. The pharmacological actions of drugs are produced in many instances due to binding to protein molecules. Bind­ing to nonaction sites such as plasma pro­teins or tissue proteins also has pharma­cological implications as it affects rates of absorption, distribution and excretion, can lead to allergic and toxic reactions and displace endogenous substances. [1],[3]

For a great majority of drugs serum albumin is quantitatively the most im­portant plasma protein. Globulin, lipo­proteins and erythrocytes form other sites of binding. Albumin has a net negative charge at physiological pH but can inter­act with both positive and negative charges on drugs. Although the earliest attraction and specificity of orientation of a drug molecule towards its binding site on albumin may be an electrostatic one, this interaction is reinforced by hydro­gen bonds, hydrophobic bonds, Van der Wall's and covalent bonds. [5]

Several methods have been used to study drug protein binding. Equilibrium dialysis, gel-filtration and the ultrafiltra­tion are the commonly used methods. Spectroscopic techniques like ultraviolet and visible absorption spectroscopy, cir­cular dichroism etc. have also been used. These recent advances in methodology may result in important new information. In vitro studies of drug albumin interac­tion would be useful to establish extent of drug binding, number of binding sites and their affinities for drugs. Use of a scatch­ard plot can give some idea regarding these. Our study with propranolol has demonstrated the presence of two binding sites-a low affinity high capacity and a high affinity low capa­city site (unpublished). In vitro studies should however be extrapolated to clini­cal situation cautiously, because these studies are conducted often under unphysiological conditions. As art alternative to in vitro measurement of plasma protein drug binding, for drugs that are not trans­ported actively, a good index of their binding in serum is the difference bet­ween total drug concentration in serum and drug concentration in protein poor body fluids such as CSF or saliva.

The importance of drug protein bind­ing to pharmacokinetics is on account of the fact that it is only the free fraction that can diffuse across capillaries and hence is available for action. Only free fraction is available for filtration and ex­cretion or metabolism by passive pro­cesses. However, both free and bound fractions are available for metabolism and excretion when active transport pro­cesses are involved for e.g. propranokal [2] and penicillin [6] respectively.

There appears to be a general tendency to overemphasize importance of drug plasma protein binding. A doubling of free fraction in plasma is thought to lead to doubling of pharmacological effect. It should however be remembered that plasma volume and drug bound to pro­tein usually form only a small part of the total drug in the body. Tissue volume of distribution is fairly large for most drugs. Hence any increase in free fraction in plasma gets diluted out as it equilibrates with tissues. It is only for drugs that have low tissue volume of distribution, a high per cent binding and low margin of safety that protein binding and displace­ment are important determinants of its action and toxicity. Thus although many drugs are highly protein bound, only a few satisfy all the three criteria, e.g., tricyclic antidepressants have large volume of distribution, penicillins have a wide therapeutic margin of safety. [6] As a result clinically important interactions indeed form a much smaller list than the num­ber of in vitro experiments. Controlled quantitative studies of possible conse­quences of displacement interactions may lengthen the list in future.

What are the implications of the dis­placement interactions in terms of drug therapy? When a displacing drug is add­ed to previous therapy with a protein bound drug there is an initial increase in free fraction, an increased distribution of the drug and an increase in pharma­cological effect. As steady state is reach­ed, however, because of increased elimina­tion the plasma concentration falls and free fraction decreases to original level (but is now a larger fraction of the total), the pharmacological effect coming down to previous level. Thus in terms of drug therapy this means one should decrease the dose of a protein bound drug initially when a displacing drug is to be added to therapy. At present however it is diffi­cult to predict accurately the necessary timing and extent of dosage changes ­which will depend also on whether drug has a slow onset of action and has active metabolites etc. [6] Titration of dosage by measuring clinical response and anti­cipating the change is still (!) the indicat­ed procedure.

Besides drug interaction disease may affect binding. Lower plasma proteins due to malnutrition, cirrhosis or renal failure, altered configuration of protein, presence of high concentrations of substances like bilirubin, free fatty acids may affect bind­ing. The quantitative effect of these on the extent of binding varies greatly among drugs. Epidemiologic studies have shown that adverse reactions to prednisone, phenytoin and diazepam are more com­mon in hypoalbuminic patients. [4] The re­sult of lowered binding is an increase in free fraction and this becomes particularly important when one is trying to adjust dosage by monitoring blood levels. This is because most of the available methods of drug assay estimate the total drug, but free fraction is actually the fraction available for action and since that is higher, a toxic effect may occur.

It thus appears on the whole that while considerable advances are being made in terms of studying the drug protein inter­action at molecular levels, the implica­tions of these in clinical practice are yet not fully understood. Effect of disease on binding is being extensively studied. The recognition that free drug is available for action and hence estimation of total drug in plasma can be misleading has led to development of assays to measure drug in protein free fluids like saliva or CSF. Computer models are being developed to predict dosage regimens from data on affinity constant for binding, volume of distribution etc. The limitations of these models still preclude their use and clinical response to drugs does remain still a ma­jor guideline in adjusting dosage in most situations in practice.


 :: Acknowledgements Top


The propranolol protein binding studies were done at Searle Research Centre, High Wycombe U.K., while one of the authors (N.K.) was working as a Searle Research Fellow. We acknowledge the assistance of the staff at Searle Research Centre.

 
 :: References Top

1.Chignell, C. F.: Spectroscopic techniques for the study of drug interactions with biological systems: Advances in Drug Research., 5: 55-94, 1969.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Evans, G. H., Nies, A. S. and Shand, D. G.: The disposition of propranolol: III: Decreased half life and volume of dis­tribution as a result of plasma binding in man, monkey, dog and rat. J. Pharmac. & Exper. Ther., 186: 114-122, 1973.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Gillette, J. R.: Overview of drug-protein binding: Ann. New York. Acad. Sci., 226: 6-17, 1973.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Greenbalt, D. J. and Koch-Weser, J.: Clinical toxicity of chlordiazepoxide and diazepam in relation to serum albumin concentration: a report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program. European J. Clin. Pharmac., 7: 259-269, 1974.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Koch-Weser, J. and Sellers, E. M.: Bind­ing of drugs to serum albumin (first of two parts). The New Eng. Med., 294: 311­316, 1976.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Koch-Weser, J. and Sellers, E. M.: Binding of drugs to serum albumin (second of two parts)., The New Eng. J. Med. 294: 526-531, 1976.  Back to cited text no. 6    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
© 2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Medknow