Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 115  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::  [PDF Not available] *
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  Abstract
 ::  Introduction
 ::  Method and Material
 ::  Observation and ...
 ::  Discussion
 ::  References
 ::  Article Figures
 ::  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4427    
    Printed70    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


 


 
ARTICLE
Year : 1977  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 130-134

Assessment of gestational age in newborn with birth-weight less than 2 kg


Department of Paediatrics, K.E.M. Hospital, and Seth G. S. Medical College, Parel, Bombay-400 012, India

Correspondence Address:
Simin F Irani
Department of Paediatrics, K.E.M. Hospital, and Seth G. S. Medical College, Parel, Bombay-400 012
India
Login to access the Email id


PMID: 614429

Get Permissions


 :: Abstract 

Neurological study of 190 newborns with birth-weight less than 2 Kg. was done. These babies were between 29 weeks to 40 weeks gestation of which 29 were babies of less than 33 weeks gestation and 161 were between 34 weeks to 40 weeks gestational age.



How to cite this article:
Irani SF, Kumta N B, Bhide A R, Mehta P. Assessment of gestational age in newborn with birth-weight less than 2 kg. J Postgrad Med 1977;23:130-4

How to cite this URL:
Irani SF, Kumta N B, Bhide A R, Mehta P. Assessment of gestational age in newborn with birth-weight less than 2 kg. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 1977 [cited 2014 Aug 29];23:130-4. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?1977/23/3/130/42766



 :: Introduction Top


Gestational age and birth-weight are the two most useful parameters for as­sessing maturity of the new-born. The latter alone is not enough because new­born babies with similar birth-weights but different gestational ages behave diff­erently. Determination of the date of conception is generally not easy. Other parameters used for assessment of gesta­tional age are affected by intra-uterine growth retardation and hence are not helpful. Neurological status of the new­born is not affected by intra-uterine growth retardation and is therefore help­ful in assessment of maturity. The Com­mittee on Perinatal Mortality [4] has recent­ly (1974) recommended that gestational age be classified into Pre-Term, Term and Post-Term.


 :: Method and Material Top


A standard neurological examination was carried out in 190 newborn babies weighing less than 2 kg. This was done approximately 11-2 hours after feeds if possible. The reflexes and the responses tested were the palmar and the plantar grasp withdrawal response, Moro's re­flex, blink response, Galant response, abdominal reflexes, pupil size and reac­tion to light, glabellar tap reflex, traction response, neck righting reflex, cross ex­tensor reflex and cremasteric reflex. The response was classified as given below:

1. Response present more or less con­stantly whatever the state or gestational age of the baby.

2. Response depending mainly on gestational age.

3. Those responses which were depen­dent on the state of arousal.

4. Variability from baby to baby and from time to time.


 :: Observation and Result Top


1. Response constantly present

The palmar and plantar grasp re­sponses were present in all the babies, although in babies of less than 31 weeks the palmar grasp consisted of only the flexion of the fingers.

The withdrawal response elicited by stimulating the sole of the foot was pre­sent in 188 babies.

The Moro's reflex was well elicited in all babies, except in six where the ab­duction and extension phase was feeble and of low amplitude. These babies were less than 29 weeks' gestation.

The blink response was present in 188 babies and depended on the state of arousal. The Galant response (Lateral incurvation of the trunk on stimulation of lumbar skin) was present in 186 babies. The abdominal reflex was pre­sent in 185 babies and was best seen in a not moving or crying baby.

2. Response dependent on Gestational age:

Pupil size and reaction to light:
It is difficult to observe this response in Pre­term babies. The lids of the eye are kept open and response to `switched on' light, and contraction of the pupils noted. The response was invariably absent in 13 babies and they all were below 31 weeks gestation.

Glabellar Tap Reflex: This is a blink of the eyelids in response to a tap on the glabella. In very immature babies the grimacing of the face is not considered a positive response. This response appears between 33-34 weeks gestation. Out of 190 babies the response was present in 169 babies. [Table 1].

Traction response: A newborn when pulled up by the wrist from the prone position responds by flexing its elbows and bracing the shoulders and by flexing its neck thus raising the head. The response tends to appear between 33 and 36 weeks gestation but the head raising part appeared slightly earlier. The re­sponse was present if either component was present. This reflex was present in 150 out of 190 babies.

Neck Righting reflex: The baby will rotate its trunk in the same direction in which the head of the baby is turned.

This reflex appears between 34-37 weeks. This was elicitable in 155 out of 190 babies. [Table 1].

Crossed Extensor Reflex: This is elicited by passively extending one leg and stimulating the sole of the foot. The extension of the opposite leg is a positive response. This response is present after 32 weeks' gestation. However the time of appearance of the reflex is unpredict­able. In this study it was present in 161 babies. See [Table 1].

Cremasteric reflex was tested in male babies only and out of 81 babies it was present in 62 babies. The response ap­pears between 32-34 weeks and was con­stantly present after this. In "small for dates" babies the cremasteric reflexes were more frequently absent than pre­sent after 34 weeks. [Table 1].

In the present study babies of different weights were classified according to various gestational age as seen in [Table 2].

The various neurological examinations were done in all these babies and those with mean birth weight 1.124 kg. had all the neurological response difficult to elicit. Most of them however were be­low 33 weeks' gestation and absence of a particular reflex was necessarily due to functional immaturity of the reflex etc.

The assessment of maturity is based on changes in posture and muscle tone. Increasing muscle tone -is a prominent feature of advancing maturity, but since the increase is a gradual one and not a sudden change from absent to present as with some of the responses, the gesta­tional age from degree of muscle tone in the present study was done with Posture, Recoil, Popliteal angle, Heel to Ear manoeuvre and Scarf's sign. Each of this sign was given a score according to Dubowitz. [3] Scoring system is as in [Table 3]. As gestational age increased the score for each criteria increased suggesting the increase in the muscle tone and partly also due to elasticity of the ligaments.


 :: Discussion Top


It has been observed that babies with same weight but different gestational ages have variable clinical problems. Not all low birth weight infants are the product of pregnancies that terminate early. [6] A good number are born at full term, and hence gestational age is con­sidered as an important adjunct to birth weight. However underweight babies with short gestational age have a more difficult problem in adjusting to the extra-uterine environment than low birth weight babies with longer gesta­tional age. According to certain authors gestational age information is helpful in the identification of newborn infants at high risk. [2]

St. Anne Dergassies [5] has presented evidence that neurological development is mainly dependent on gestational age, while being largely independent of postnatal age. As far as the neurological behaviour is concerned it matters little whether an infant with a conceptional age of 40 weeks reached this age in utero or spent a later portion of the time as a premature. Babies of 4.0 weeks behave identically neurologically whether or not they are born prematurely and whether they were of normal weight or underweight. Saint Anne Dergassies' as­sessment of maturity is based largely on the changes in posture and muscle tone and on the nature of crossed extensor reflex. [5] Electromyographic studies do show strong and long lasting myotonic flexor activity in a number of neonatal reflexes such as Moro, recoil of the fore­arms and traction responses, whereas the extensors receive only short lasting innervation during comparable move­ments. A great number of the so called "primitive reflexes" depend on the tonic myotactic reflex activity of the newborn. In the wakeful full term infant an exten­sion of the forearm is followed by a rather quick recoil into the flexed posi­tion. In accordance with flexor pre­ponderance tonic myotactic reflexes are more easily obtained in flexor than in extensor muscles. They are difficult to demonstrate in infants of less than 34 weeks' gestational age, yet are normally present by 36 weeks. [1] In the present study traction reflex was well elicited after 34 weeks' gestation.

Increasing muscle tone is a prominent feature of advancing maturity, but since the increase is a gradual one, the gesta­tional age from degree of muscle tone tends to be subjective. This is seen with the popliteal angle measurement where the angle decreases with increasing gestational age, and this is due to in­creased muscle tone and partly due to elasticity of the ligaments. In the pre­sent study the popliteal angle was signi­ficantly decreased in babies with more than 36 weeks gestation, but in some full term babies there was a full range of movement.

A number of neonatal reflexes are especially useful in determining gesta­tional age in normal newborns since their development proceeds in spurts at particular time periods during gestation 34 weeks the flexion and abduction por­tion of the Moro's response increases. In the present study a feeble abduction and extension phase was seen in six babies.

The pupil reactions are always absent before 29 weeks gestation, but the eye can detect light and shows blink re­sponse. The blink response in the present study was present in 188 babies, and depended on the state of arousal. The failure of pupil to react before 31 weeks is due to a pupillary membrane interfer­ing with contraction of the iris and this disappears by 30 weeks' gestation. The cremasteric reflex is absent before 32 weeks and may be due to poor scrotal development and incomplete testicular descent. This reflex in "small for dates" babies depends on their body weight rather than the gestational age. The cremasteric reflex in the present study was present constantly after 34 weeks except in 8 "small for dates" babies.

The gestational age at which each re­flex first appeared was uninfluenced by birth weight being the same in "small for dates" babies as in those having a nor­mal birth weight for their gestational age (except the cremasteric reflexes). A significant difference in behaviour was demonstrated between babies of similar birth weight but different gestational ages for the pupil reaction, glabellar tap response, and traction reflexes. A reflex must have a relatively clearcut time of appearance which is constant in normal birth weight babies and small for dates babies. Five reflexes fulfilled the criteria - Pupil reaction to light (29-31 weeks), Traction response (33-36 weeks), Glabellar Tap Reflex (32-34 weeks), Neck righting reflex (34-37 weeks), Head turning to light (32-3u weeks). Other reflexes showed some rela­tion to gestational age but were too in-, constant in behaviour to serve as indices of maturity [Figure 1].

 
 :: References Top

1.Amiel-Tison C.: Neurological evaluation of the maturity of newborn infants. Arch. Dis. Child, 43: 89-93, 1968.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Battaglia, F. C. and Lubchenco, L. O.: A practical classification of new born infants by weight and gestational age. J. Pae­diat., 71: 159-163, 1967.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Dubowitz, L. M., Dubowitz V. and Gold­burg, C.: Clinical assessment of gesta­tional age in new-horn infant. J. Paediat.,77: 1-10, 1970.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Dunn, P. M.: Analysis of perinatal mor­bidity and mortality. W.H.O. Reports, May 1974.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Saint-Anne Dergassies, S.:: Quoted in "Scientific foundation of Paediatrics." Edited by Davis, J. A. and Dobbing, J.First Indian Edition. Willian Heinemann Medical Books Ltd. London; Pitman Press Bath. Great Britain and Bhalani Medical Book House Bombay, 1974. pp.: 597-598.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Yeru-Shalmy, J.: Classification of new born infants by birth weights and gesta­tional age. J. Paediat., 71: 164-172, 1967.  Back to cited text no. 6    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
© 2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Medknow