Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 157  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::Related articles
 ::  Article in PDF (16 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  Purpose
 ::  Assessment criteria
 ::  General criteria...
 ::  Objectivising ev...
 ::  Conclusions
 ::  References
 ::  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4706    
    Printed85    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded118    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal


 


 
INVITED ARTICLE
Year : 1994  |  Volume : 40  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 208-9

Postgraduate dissertations--a suggested scheme for objectivising their evaluation.


Dept of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry.,

Correspondence Address:
N Ananthakrishnan
Dept of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry.

Login to access the Email id


PMID: 0009136241

Get Permissions



Keywords: Curriculum, Education, Graduate, Educational Measurement, Human,


How to cite this article:
Ananthakrishnan N. Postgraduate dissertations--a suggested scheme for objectivising their evaluation. J Postgrad Med 1994;40:208

How to cite this URL:
Ananthakrishnan N. Postgraduate dissertations--a suggested scheme for objectivising their evaluation. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 1994 [cited 2014 Oct 1];40:208. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?1994/40/4/208/525




The preparation and submission of a dissertation is an integral part of the curriculum at the level of postgraduate examinations at the degree level. Unfortunately, this exercise is not taken with due seriousness by most students since the current system of evaluation of the work is totally subjective and is strongly biased towards acceptance of the dissertation irrespective of the merits of the presentation. It must be admitted that examiners are to a large extent responsible for this state of affairs as most of them treat writing of dissertations as an unavoidable evil that must be accepted rather than as a purposeful exercise. It is the aim of this presentation to stress on the objectives of this aspect of postgraduate training and suggest a scheme of objectivising the evaluation process.


  ::   Purpose Top


The main aim of requiring a postgraduate student preparing for an MD or an MS degree to write a dissertation is to ensure that sufficient training has been given to the candidate in scientific methodology, in the analysis and interpretation of a problem and in cogent, clear and logical presentation of data in a meaningful manner. Such a training is required for all health personnel irrespective of whether they enter academics or not since analysis of a problem in a scientific manner and clear communication of one's views on the same Js necessary for all doctors irrespective of their station in life. In this context it must be stressed that there is a significant difference between a doctoral thesis and a postgraduate dissertation. A doctoral thesis is essentially a hypothesis or a proposition, which the candidate advances and is prepared to defend. The criteria of acceptance here is, therefore, originality. On the other hand, a post-graduate dissertation is merely a written presentation on the subject, which analyses the problem in detail and contributes to knowledge in that particular area. The emphasis, therefore, should be more on fulfilment of the objective of knowledge of research methodology and format (interpretation, accuracy of data, presentation) rather than on originality.


  ::   Assessment criteria Top


In view of the aforesaid, the assessment of a post-graduate dissertation must be based on certifying the possession of the following abilities:

1. clear approach to the subject and ability to define a problem, plan a study and realise and overcome difficulties, if any;

2. ability to interpret others' work in so far as it applies to one's own;

3. ability to record and analyse data,

4. ability to infer the significance of his work in the context of knowledge on the subject already existing.


  ::   General criteria of evaluation Top


Importance must be given to clarity, brevity, precision and accuracy of presentation. Emphasis must be laid on completeness of presentation, impartiality of analysis and logical sequence of recording. it is particularly necessary to look for objectivity of the candidate's analysis and a realisation on the candidate's part of unresolved issues and limitations of this study which require further work.


  ::   Objectivising evaluation Top


The current practice of evaluation of dissertation largely consists of the evaluator's recommendation on whether the work is to be accepted or not. Some universities require general comments by the examiners on the quality of the work. However, there is no structured evaluation form and there is no scope for gradation of the work. A well written dissertation must answer the following four questions as stated by Bradford-Hill.

A. Why did the candidate do it? - in other words the introduction and the aims and objectives of the work.

B. What did he do? - This refers to the section on Material And Method.

C. What did he find? - This pertains to the observation and results of the study.

D. What does it mean? - This refers to a discussion on his findings with reference to the work of others and conclusions from his study.

In view of the above, the following scheme of evaluation is suggested on a 3 point rating scale for each section of the dissertation.

Although, only a 3 point scale is mentioned above, it can be expanded as required. Points can be allotted for each item mentioned in the evaluation form above and a total, which indicates the candidates’ performance arrived at. In the current system, by its very nature, evaluation of a post-graduate dissertation is likely to be influenced by the topic and the familiarity and the interest of the evaluator in the subject/topic. By objectivising the process as above, the total marks obtained by the candidate would be independent of the subject matter over the choice of which he seldom has any control.

The final score can be converted and expressed in one of the following 3 conventional terms:

1. Adequate and acceptable (with grading of quality)

2. Not acceptable for reasons stated

3. Acceptable subject to modification/corrections and clarifications


  ::   Conclusions Top


In conclusion, it must be stated that postgraduate dissertations have a very important role to play in the training of the specialist. It is necessary that this is realised and a meaning and a purpose given to an exercise which hitherto in most instances is not given the importance that it deserves.

 
 :: References Top

1. Ewing D. Five requirements of professional writing. In: Ewing DW, editor. Writing for Results in Business, Government and the Profession. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1974.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Hawkins C, Sorgi M. Research - How to Plan, Speak and Write about it. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1985.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Kothari CR. Research Methodology - Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: Wiley Eastern Ltd; 1985.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Mason EJ, Bramble WJ. Understanding and Conducting Research / Application in Education and the Behavioural Sciences. New York: McGraw Hill; 1978.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Morris LC, Fitz-Gibbon CT. Evaluator's Handbook. London: Sage Publications; 1978.   Back to cited text no. 5    


    Tables

[Table - 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Teaching research methodology to postgraduates: Is dissertation the only method?
Gitanjali B, Raveendran R
NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA. 1998; 11 (1): 23-25
[Pubmed]
2 MD/MS dissertations - The case in favour
Ananthakrishnan N
NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA. 1998; 11 (1): 25-26
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
© 2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Medknow