| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||14455 |
| Printed||338 |
| Emailed||14 |
| PDF Downloaded||250 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
| Cited by others ||3 |
Click on image for details.
|Year : 2001 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 252-5
The Antley-Bixler syndrome: two new cases.
HS Hosalkar, HS Shah, PS Gujar, BA Shaw
Division of Paediatric Orthopaedics, The Valley Children's Hospital, UCSF, California, USA. , USA
H S Hosalkar
Division of Paediatric Orthopaedics, The Valley Children's Hospital, UCSF, California, USA.
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
The Antley-Bixler syndrome is a rare multiple congenital anomaly with a high mortality rate. The characteristic manifestations include craniosynostosis, radiohumeral synostosis, midface hypoplasia, joint contractures and arachnodactyly. We report two new cases of this syndrome and address the diagnostic features, associated malformations, inheritance patterns, prenatal findings, and briefly review the literature.
Keywords: Abnormalities, Multiple, genetics,radiography,Case Report, Contracture, genetics,radiography,Craniosynostoses, genetics,radiography,Human, Infant, Male, Marfan Syndrome, genetics,radiography,Syndrome, Synostosis, genetics,radiography,
|How to cite this article:|
Hosalkar H S, Shah H S, Gujar P S, Shaw B A. The Antley-Bixler syndrome: two new cases. J Postgrad Med 2001;47:252
Antley-Bixler syndrome More Details (ABS) is a rare developmental malformation with many musculoskeletal, craniofacial and urogenital anomalies necessitating multi-systemic assessment. Mortality is as high as 80% in the first months of life. We present two new cases that illustrate well the classic diagnostic features of the syndrome. We highlight features of this potentially debilitating syndrome, discuss role of early diagnosis, multidisciplinary team approach in management, and briefly review the literature.
Case I: A 5-month old Hispanic boy, born to a 21-year-old primigravida and a 27-year-old father, presented with a forearm fracture following injury. The parents were unrelated and family history was not contributory. The pregnancy was uneventful and the baby was vaginally delivered at 38 weeks of gestation. At birth, weight was 2.79 kgs (10th to 25th percentile), total body length was 46.5 cms (5th to 10th percentile), and head circumference was 33.5 cms (10th to 25th percentile). There were associated delayed milestones, dysmorphic features, seizures, and elbow joint deformities that were noted since birth.
On examination there was evidence of brachycephaly (trapezoidal head with cephalic index of 82.5), frontal bossing, midface hypoplasia, depressed nasal bridge and proptosis. Examination of limbs revealed fused elbows, multiple joint contractures and arachnodactyly. Radiographs confirmed the bilateral radiohumeral synostosis and forearm fracture on the right side [Figure - 1]. Skull x-rays and computed tomographic (CT) scans confirmed synostoses of both coronal sutures. Proptosis was documented on the scans [Figure - 2] and so was bilateral choanal atresia. He had a narrow rib cage with thin ribs. Chromosomal studies were normal. The fracture was splinted and it subsequently healed. Craniosynostosis was treated with reconstruction cranioplasty [Figure - 3], [Figure:4a] & [Figure:4b] involving forehead and orbital advancement at the age of nine months. Aggressive respiratory and physical therapy program was continued. Follow up at 11 months revealed a head circumference of 42.5 cms with excellent results of craniofacial reconstruction. The child is alert and growing well when seen last at 14 months of age.
Case II: An 8-month old Hispanic boy was referred to the orthopaedic services for congenital fused elbows, following assessment for craniosynostosis. The child was born of a full term normal delivery from unrelated parents. Anthropometry at birth included a birth weight of 3 kgs (25th percentile), length of 49.5 cms (25th to 50th percentile), and head circumference of 34 cms (25th to 50th percentile). The fatherís family history was significant for a brother who had a premature child (which expired), a sister who had multiple miscarriages, and another sister who had a son with hypoplastic left heart.
Examination revealed brachycephaly (cephalic index of 83.2), bilateral coronal synostoses, midface hypoplasia [Figure:5a] & [Figure:5b], radiohumeral synostosis, femoral bowing, and camptodactyly involving both hands. Imaging confirmed the synostoses and complete choanal atresia on the right side. At nine months his height was 72 cms (25th to 50th percentile), weight was 7.285 kgs (< 5th centile), and head circumference was 41.5 cms (< 5th centile). Parents were explained about the recurrence risk for their family. The child is on respiratory and physical therapy and scheduled for craniofacial surgery.
Antley and Bixler in 1975 were the first to report a child with trapezoidocephaly, midface hypoplasia, radiohumeral synostoses, and fractures of the femur. DeLozier in 1980 referred to this syndrome as a multisynostotic osteodysgenesis with long bone fractures., The aetiopathogenesis of this syndrome is still not known. Sex ratio has been observed to be 2:7 for males and females. Review of the literature, to the best of our knowledge reveals that 41 cases have been described.,,,,
Autosomal recessive inheritance has been suggested by most authors.,, However, there are reports of a new dominant mutation at the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) locus as well as in the offspring of mothers taking the antifungal agent fluconazole during early pregnancy. Reardon et al have reported abnormalities of steroid biogenesis in seven of 16 patients with an Antley-Bixler phenotype, and identified FGFR2 mutations in seven of these 16 patients, including one patient with abnormal steroidogenesis. These findings suggest digenic inheritance in some cases of ABS. Chun et al were the first to report an apparent dominant de novo mutation in the FGFR2 gene. Consanguinity has been reported twice.
The classical manifestations of ABS include craniosynostosis, radiohumeral synostosis, midface hypoplasia, joint contractures and arachnodactyly. Synostosis of cranial sutures and elbow joints is considered as the minimal diagnostic criteria. Varying urogenital anomalies including ectopic kidneys, ureteric obstruction, hypoplastic uterus, hypoplastic or fused labia majora, large clitoris, small penis or undescended testes, are seen in less than 50% of the patients. Congenital heart defects have been noted in about 21 % cases. We have compared the anomalies in our cases with the estimated percentage of those described in literature [Table - 1]. Radiological diagnosis is based on demonstrating craniosynostosis, radiohumeral synostosis, midface hypoplasia, and other associated femoral, hip or spine anomalies. Urogenital and cardiac anomalies need special imaging.
Respiratory distress secondary to choanal atresia or stenosis can be a serious factor for mortality, often requiring intubation, tracheostomy and nasal stents. Prognosis is guarded in infancy and childhood, and improves with age. The craniosynostosis can result in disruption of normal brain development and cause retardation. Auditory dysfunction may be conductive or sensorineural. Although radiohumeral synostosis, joint contractures and arachnodactyly are present in almost all cases, other orthopaedic manifestations could be femoral bowing, ulnar bowing, camptodactyly, synostosis of the carpal and tarsal bones, clubfoot, vertebral body anomalies and perinatal fractures. Results of resecting the synostosis are not encouraging and surgery may best be avoided. Finger contractures are associated with shortened tendons, which usually improve with physical therapy. Hip movements are limited secondary to contractures and may predispose to femoral fractures.
Prenatal diagnosis by mid-trimester ultrasound examination is possible and should be recommended.,, Fixed flexion of the elbow appears to be the essential diagnostic finding, although humero-radial synostosis, medial bowing of ulna, long hands and fingers, and bowing of femora have been noted. The poor prognosis (in view of high infant mortality) in this condition makes counselling difficult and early termination of pregnancy a consideration. Genetic counselling is important and depends on accurate prognostic and therapeutic data.
Clinicians should recognise that Antley-Bixler syndrome could lead to significant respiratory problems in early infancy leading to mortality. Synostosis frequently results in early orthopaedic consult, and the surgeons should be aware of the frequent association with this syndrome. Early aggressive intervention and addressing major congenital malformations forms the mainstay of treatment. Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis and genetic counselling play an important role.
| :: References|| |
Jones KL. Smithís recognizable patterns of human malformation. In: Jones KL, editor. Antley-Bixler syndrome. 5th ed. Philadelphia; W.B. Saunders Company: 1997. pp428-429. |
|2.||Rumball KM, Pang E, Letts RM. Musculoskeletal manifestations of the Antley-Bixler syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop 1999; 8:139-143. |
|3.||Silverman FN. Birth Defects Encyclopedia. In: Buyse ML, editor. Antley-Bixler syndrome. Philadelphia; Blackwell Scientific: 1990. pp154-155. |
|4.||Bottero L, Cinalli G, Labrune P, Lajeunie E, Renier D. Antley-Bixler syndrome. Description of two new cases and a review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 1997; 13:275-281. |
|5.||LeBard SE, Thiemann LJ. Antley-Bixler syndrome: a case report and discussion. Paediatr Anaesth 1998; 8:89-91. |
|6.||Reardon W, Smith A, Honour JW, Hindmarsh P, Das D, Rumsby G et al. Evidence for digenic inheritance in some cases of Antley-Bixler syndrome? J Med Genet 2000; 37:26-32. |
|7.||Roth C, Hinney B, Peter M, Steinberger D, Lakomek M. Features of Antley-Bixler syndrome in an infant born to a mother with pregnancy luteoma. Eur J Pediatr 2000; 159:189-192. |
|8.||Chun K, Siegel-Bartelt J, Chitayat D, Phillips J, Ray PN. FGFR2 mutation associated with clinical manifestations consistent with Antley-Bixler syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1998; 77:219-224. |
|9.||Feigin E, Udassin R, Seror D, Szold A, Ben Neriah Z, Glick B. Antley-Bixler syndrome and esophageal atresia in a patient with trisomy 21. Clin Genet 1995; 47:53-55. |
|10.||Hassell S, Butler MG. Antley-Bixler syndrome: report of a patient and review of literature. Clin Genet 1994; 46:372-376. |
|11.||Schinzel A, Savoldelli G, Briner J, Sigg P, Massini C. Antley-Bixler syndrome in sisters: a term newborn and a prenatally diagnosed fetus. Am J Med Genet 1983; 14:139-147. |
|12.||Escobar LF, Bixler D, Sadove M, Bull MJ. Antley-Bixler syndrome from a prognostic perspective: report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet 1988; 29:829-836.
[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4]
[Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Anesthesia for an infant with Antley-Bixler syndrome
| ||Boswell D, Mayhew J |
| ||PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA. 2007; 17 (5): 497-498 |
||Prenatal diagnostic of craniostenoses
| ||Bernard JP, Levaillant JM |
| ||NEUROCHIRURGIE. 2006; 52 (2-3): 246-258 |
||Correction of facial deformity using a red III device in a patient with Antley-Bixler syndrome
| ||Tuncbilek G, Vargel I, Mavili ME |
| ||JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY. 2004; 15 (6): 1043-1048 |