Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 4190  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::Related articles
 ::  Article in PDF (395 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  Abstract
 ::  Patients and methods
 ::  Results
 ::  Discussion
 ::  Acknowledgments
 ::  References
 ::  Article Figures
 ::  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed21257    
    Printed361    
    Emailed20    
    PDF Downloaded285    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 7    

Recommend this journal


 


 
BRIEF REPORT
Year : 2002  |  Volume : 48  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 270-3

Magnetic resonance arthrography in recurrent anterior shoulder instability as compared to arthroscopy: a prospective comparative study.


Department of Radiology, Seth G. S. Medical College and K. E. M. Hospital, and Jhankaria Imaging Center, Mumbai, India., India

Correspondence Address:
H Parmar
Department of Radiology, Seth G. S. Medical College and K. E. M. Hospital, and Jhankaria Imaging Center, Mumbai, India.
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 12571381

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions


 :: Abstract 

AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) arthrographic imaging in the diagnosis of glenoid labral and ligament tears in recurrent shoulder instability. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective, comparative study at a tertiary care centre. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with three or more episodes of anterior shoulder dislocation were enrolled in the study. They were subjected to magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) for delineation of abnormalities. The findings obtained at MRA were compared with those found at arthroscopy and surgical exploration. RESULTS: MRA detected glenoid tears in all 22 patients with 20 (90%) patients having antero-inferior tears, 3 (14%) patients had superior labral involvement and 2 (10%) patients had posterior labral abnormality. On arthroscopy, antero-inferior, superior and posterior labral tear were found in 21 (95%), 5 (22%) and 7 (32%) patients respectively. MRA showed a sensitivity of 95%, and a specificity of 100% for the detection of the antero-inferior labral tears. The sensitivity of MRA for the detection of superior, middle and inferior glenohumeral ligament tear was 83%, 80% and 86% with a specificity of 100%, 71% and 93% respectively. MRA was 100% sensitive for the detection of rotator cuff injuries and detection of bony lesions like Hill-Sach's and bony Bankart's lesion. CONCLUSIONS: MRA is a sensitive and specific modality for evaluation of anterior shoulder instability.


Keywords: Adolescent, Adult, Arthrography, methods,Arthroscopy, Comparative Study, Human, Joint Instability, diagnosis,Ligaments, Articular, injuries,Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Age, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Sensitivity and Specificity, Shoulder Joint,


How to cite this article:
Parmar H, Jhankaria B, Maheshwari M, Singrakhia M, Shanbag S, Chawla A, Deshpande S. Magnetic resonance arthrography in recurrent anterior shoulder instability as compared to arthroscopy: a prospective comparative study. J Postgrad Med 2002;48:270

How to cite this URL:
Parmar H, Jhankaria B, Maheshwari M, Singrakhia M, Shanbag S, Chawla A, Deshpande S. Magnetic resonance arthrography in recurrent anterior shoulder instability as compared to arthroscopy: a prospective comparative study. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2002 [cited 2019 Nov 12];48:270. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2002/48/4/270/81


Shoulder is one of the most unstable and frequently dislocated joints in the body and accounts for nearly 50% of all the dislocations.[1] Prior to the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), plain radiography and cumbersome arthrography were the only tools for evaluation of the shoulder joint. MRI has changed the whole perspective of shoulder imaging. MR imaging allows visualisation of soft tissues and as well as osseous pathology in exquisite details that was not possible by conventional radiographs and arthrogram or even computerised tomographic (CT) scan. Although MR has been shown to be superior in imaging rotator cuff tears, there is some discrepancy in the role of conventional MR in detection of labral lesions.[2] The sensitivity of this new modality is sought to be improved by passive distension of the joint by positive MR contrast. This allows visualisation of the glenoid labrum, glenohumeral ligament, rotator cuff and other intracapsular structure in great details.[2]

We conducted a study to evaluate the accuracy of MRA imaging in the diagnosis of glenoid labral and ligament tears in patients with recurrent shoulder instability.


  ::   Patients and methods Top


This prospective study was conducted over a 7-month period after obtaining clearance from the institutionís Ethics committee. Patients with recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder, defined as three or more episodes of anterior dislocations were enrolled. Patients with congenital habitual dislocation and those without any history of trauma were excluded from the study.

Plain radiographs of shoulder joint in antero-posterior view (in neutral and internal position) were obtained and evaluated for the presence of any bony lesions. The procedure of shoulder arthrogram was performed using standard fluoroscopy guided anterior approach. 0.1 cc of gadopentate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Schering, Germany) and 2 cc of ioxaglate sodium meglumine (Hexabrix 320 Mallinckrodt, Guerbet, S.A.) mixed in 20 cc of normal saline was used as a contrast medium. The volume required ranged from 12-25 cc with average of 18 cc. Optimal images were obtained within 45 minutes of injection. MR imaging was later on performed on a 0.2 Tesla open MR system (Magnetom Open Viva, Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). Axial, oblique coronal and oblique sagittal images were obtained in all cases. Spin echo (SE) axial images were obtained with TR/TE/NA of 528/26/2 for T1 weighted images (WI) and 2840/102/3 for T2W images with 4 mm slice thickness and 1 mm intersection gap. Oblique coronal sections were obtained with SE 528/26/1 (TR/TE/NA) with 4 mm slice thickness and 1 mm intersection gap. Oblique sagittal images were also obtained with 528/26/2 (TR/TE/NA) with 4 mm slice thickness and 1 mm intersection gap. Dual echo in steady state (DESS) images were obtained with a TR/TE/NA of 41/12/1 in axial and sagittal planes.

A 180-200 mm field of view and 256 X 256 acquisition and 512 X 512 display matrix were used in all our cases. The position of the patient was supine and the affected arm was in neutral position.

Two qualified radiologists, who were given only the clinical details of the patients, interpreted all images independently. Damage of the labrum was diagnosed when a normal low signal intensity, cross sectional appearance was disrupted or when abnormal signal intensity was noted. Tears were considered to involve the anterior or posterior part of the labrum if tears were seen on axial images. Tears were classified as superior or inferior labrum if they were visualised on coronal images. The signal intensity was compared with that of the nearby muscles and posterior labrum for comparison.

Arthroscopy was performed by different surgeons in all the patients within 10 days of patients having undergone MRA. Findings obtained on arthroscopy were considered as the gold standard for the diagnosis of the labral and gleno-humeral ligament pathology. Based on their appearances at arthroscopy labral tears were defined as frank tears, absence of labrum or marked fraying or degeneration.


  ::   Results Top


Twenty two patients (all males, age ranging from 16 to 50 years) were enrolled in the study. The mean duration of shoulder instability prior to evaluation was 28 months (range 6- 96 months). MR arthrogram detected glenoid tears in all the 22 (100%) patients of which 20 (91%) had antero-inferior tears, 3 (14%) had superior labral involvement and 2 (9%) had posterior labral abnormality. The antero-inferior labrum showed Bankartís lesion [Figure - 1] in 12 (55%) patients, ALPSA (Anterior labrum periosteal sleeve avulsion) lesion [Figure - 2] in 5 (23%) and GLOM (Glenoid labrum ovoid mass) lesion in 1 patient (5%). Two patients (9%) had absent or completely denuded labrum. Other abnormalities associated with anterior labral tears were severely truncated labrum (15%) and absent labrum (15%). Three patient with superior labral involvement had SLAP (Superior labrum anterior posterior) lesion. MRA further detected superior, middle and inferior GHL tears in 5 (23%), 14 (64%) and 7 (32%) patients, respectively.

Arthroscopy detected the antero-inferior labral tear in 21 (95%) patients, superior and posterior labral involvement in 5 (23%) and 4 (18%), respectively [Table - 1]. It also revealed superior, middle and inferior GHL tears in 6 (27%), 15 (68%) and 7 (32%) patients, respectively.

MRA showed a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 100% for the detection of the antero-inferior labral tears. Sensitivity was less for superior and posterior labral tears being 60% and 50% respectively. The sensitivity of MRA for the detection of superior, middle and inferior glenohumeral ligament tear was 83%, 80% and 86% with a specificity of 100%, 71% and 93%, respectively. MRA was 100 % sensitive for the detection of the rotator cuff injuries and detection of bony lesions like Hill-Sachís [Figure - 3] and bony Bankartís lesions.

MRA, however, missed loose bodies in the joint space in three patients, which were subsequently found on arthroscopy. Although we reported capsular abnormalities in 12 (55%) patients, there was no information contained about the capsule in the arthroscopy report and hence their sensitivity could not be evaluated.

The procedure of MRA was not associated with any morbidity. None of our patients complained of excessive pain, fever or restricted movement of the joint after the arthrogram. Mild pain was noticed for a maximum of 24 hours and could be managed with analgesics.


  ::   Discussion Top


Disability due to recurrent subluxation of the humerus is a common clinical problem. It is due to a glenoid labrum injury or a lax capsular mechanism. Although the most important structures within the capsular mechanism have yet to be determined, arthroscopic surgical repair of the anterior labrum is providing clinical improvement.[3] Therefore, accurate identification of the labral and glenohumeral ligament tears has become a significant diagnostic goal.

Before the introduction of MR imaging, only invasive tests like arthrography, CT arthrography (CTA) or arthroscopy were available for successful evaluation of the labrum. Though CTA offers excellent sensitivity and specificity4 in identifying labral tears, it involves ionising radiation and is limited only to axial imaging. Also few portions of the superior labrum and the glenohumeral ligaments cannot be visualised opitmally.5 The non-ionising, multi-planar imaging by MR makes it an attractive imaging modality. Addition of contrast into the joint followed by MRA further enhances the sensitivity offered by plain MR imaging.6 In fact, MRA using dilute gadolinium is becoming the imaging gold standard for the evaluation of glenoid labrum.7,8

The pathological results of recurrent instability have been well documented.[9],[10],[11],[12] The most common abnormality is the detachment of the antero-inferior labrum, the Bankartís lesion.[9] Other pathological findings in chronic shoulder instability include joint capsule stripping from the scapula, rotator cuff tears and disease of the biceps tendon along with the bony Bankartís lesion and Hill-Sachís defect.[13]

We could successfully diagnose anterior and anteroinfeior labral tears with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 100%. This sensitivity compares favourably with the studies done by others.[7],[14] The most common appearance of a torn anterior labrum was visible as a linear signal intensity cutting through the substance of the labrum as seen in 60% of the cases. An additional interesting appearance of the torn labrum was the GLOM lesion. This represented a dark rounded mass of tissue and proton density on T2 W images, which was best seen at the base of the coracoid. GLOM is felt to represent the torn anterior labrum that had retracted superiorly. Other interesting injuries noted were ALPSA lesion seen in 5 (22%) patients. It is very similar to the classic Bankartís lesion but here the labral ligament is complex, is displaced medially with an intact scapular periosteum.

Sensitivity of MRA diminished when it came to the diagnosis of the posterior and superior labral tears. The inferior labrum is not well visualised due to the redundant capsule overlying this region.

Capsular stripping is well seen because of good distension of joint space by the contrast. Capsular stripping can be missed in a routine MR imaging unless the dislocation is acute or there is joint effusion.[15] Capsular stripping without coexistent labral abnormalities is rare and will not require an arthrotomy. Therefore, the limitations of MRI in depicting this abnormality are not clinically significant.

Although our study shows MRA to be very sensitive to the anteroinferior labral tears, sensitivity for glenohumeral ligament tears was much less. This was especially true for MGL and MGL tears were missed in 20% (3/15) and were falsely detected in 29% (2/7) of cases. This is because of a number of anatomical variations of MGL that may mimic a ligament tear.

Loose body and joint space can occur in a chronic dislocation. These were most likely missed due the error at the reading by the radiologists. The error in missing them was human and not technical. They were detected in retrospect on MRA after knowing the arthroscopy findings.

The high prevalence of labral abnormalities in predominantly young and athletic patients included in the study introduces an inherent bias. These results cannot be extrapolated to the elderly individuals in whom degenerative changes of the labrum may lead to false positive results. While this selection bias for our studies may slightly influence our results, we believe that the sensitivity and specificity of the study is fairly accurate.

The procedure of MRA was well tolerated by patients without any significant morbidity. Pain, if present lasted for a maximum duration of 24 hours and could be managed with analgesics.

In conclusion, it can be said that MRA is a valuable tool for the detection of tears in patients with recurrent shoulder instability. It is highly sensitive and specific in detecting antero-inferior labral tears (the commonest injury causing recurrent anterior shoulder instability).


  ::   Acknowledgments Top


We acknowledge the help of Dr. G. R. Jhankaria for allowing the use of fluoroscopic equipment and Drs. A. Narvekar and V. Prabhu for referring the patients.

 
 :: References Top

1.Rockwood CA, Wirth MA. Subluxation and dislocations about the glenohumeral joint.Rockwood and Greensís treatment in adults 4th ed. [Philadelphia] Lippincott-Raven; 1996: 1193-1202.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Rafii M, Minkoff J. Advanced arthrography of shoulder with CT and MR imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 1998;36:609-33.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Hawkins RB. Arthroscopic stapling repair for shoulder instability. A retrospective study of 50 cases. Arthroscopy.1989;5:122-128.   Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Wilson AJ, Totty WG, Murphy WA, Hardy DC. Shoulder joint:Arthrotomographic CT and long term follow-up with surgical correlation. Radiology 1989;173:329-33.   Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Loehr SP, Pope TL Jr, Martin DF, Link KM, Monu JU, Reboussin D. Three-dimensional MRI of the glenoid labrum. Skeletal Radiol 1995;24:117-21.   Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Flannigan B, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder S, Karzel R, Del Pizzo W, Resnick D. Magnetic resonance arthrography in the assessment of the anterior instability of the shoulder:Comparison with conventional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155:829-32.   Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Tratting S, Breitenseker M, Pretterklierber M, Kontaxis G, Rand T, Helbich T, et al. MR guided joint puncture and real time MR assisted contrast media application. Acta Radiologica 1997;38:1047-9.   Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Chandnani VP, Yeager TD, DeBerardins T, Christenson K, Gagliardi JA, Heitz DR, et al. Glenoid labral tears;prospective evaluation with with MR imaging, MR arthrography and CT arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol . 1993;161:1229-35.   Back to cited text no. 8    
9.McGlynn FJ, Caspari RD. Arthroscopic findings in subluxating shoulder. Clin Orthop 1984;183:173-8.   Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Moseley HF, Overguard B. The anterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1962;44:913-27.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Rothman RH, Marvel JP, Hippenstall RB. Anatomic considerations in the glenohumeral joint. Orthop Clin North Am 1975;6:341-52.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Rothman RH, Marvel JP, Hippenstall RB. Recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Orthop Clin North Am 1975;6:415-22.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Legan JM, Barkhard TK, Goff WB 2nd, Balsara ZN, Martinej AJ, Burks DD, et al. Tears of the glenoid labrum:MR imaging of the 88 arthroscopically confirmed cases. Radiology 1991;179:241-6.   Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Gross ML, Seeyer LL, Smith JB, Mandelbaum BR, Finerman GA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the glenoid labrum. Am J Sports Med 1990;18:229-34.   Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Kieft GF, Bloom JL, Rojing PM, Obermann WR. MR imaging of recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Comparison with the CT rthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:1083-7.  Back to cited text no. 15    


    Figures

[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3]

    Tables

[Table - 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Intraobserver and interobserver agreement of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes in classifying shoulder instability
Throckmorton, T.W., Dunn, W., Holmes, T., Kuhn, J.E.
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2009; 18(2): 199-203
[Pubmed]
2 Classification and diagnostics of unstable shoulders | [Klassifikation und diagnostik der instabilen schulter]
Greiner, S., Herrmann, S., Gerhardt, C., Scheibel, M.
Orthopade. 2009; 38(1): 6-15
[Pubmed]
3 Anatomy, Examination, and Imaging of the Shoulder
Nguyen, D.
Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2008; 18(1): 2-8
[Pubmed]
4 Fissures of the posterior labrum and associated lesions: CT arthrogram evaluation
Noel C, Campagna R, Minoui A, et al.
JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE. 2008; 89(4): 487-493
[Pubmed]
5 MR arthrography of traumatic anterior shoulder lesions showed modest reproducibility and accuracy when evaluated under clinical circumstances
van Grinsven S, Kesselring FOHW, van Wassenaer-van Hall HN, et al.
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY. 2007; 127 (1): 11-17
[Pubmed]
6 Shoulder magnetic ressonance arthrography to evaluate anterior instability | [Artro-ressonância do ombro na instabilidade anterior]
Honda, E., Aihara, A.Y., Natour, J., Fernandes, A.D.R.C.
Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia. 2006; 46(3): 214-218
[Pubmed]
7 3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (Part II): Clinical applications
Ramnath, R.R.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America. 2006; 14(1): 41-62
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
© 2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow