Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 1512  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::  Article in PDF (88 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4591    
    Printed160    
    Emailed4    
    PDF Downloaded146    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal


 


 
LETTERS
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 51  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 152

Mortality of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the UK


Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Sheriff Hill, Gateshead NE6 9SX, United Kingdom

Correspondence Address:
Sawas Kadis
Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Sheriff Hill, Gateshead NE6 9SX
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 16006716

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions




How to cite this article:
Leontiadis G I, Moschos J, Cowper T, Kadis S. Mortality of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the UK. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:152

How to cite this URL:
Leontiadis G I, Moschos J, Cowper T, Kadis S. Mortality of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the UK. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2005 [cited 2019 Dec 11];51:152. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2005/51/2/152/16386


Sir,

We read with great interest the original article by Janes et al[1] and the accompanying Expert's Comments by Lang[2] published in the March 2005 issue of J Postgrad Med . Janes et al found that 30-day mortality of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) was 22% in a hospital in the UK during 2002 as opposed to a mortality of 10% 10 years earlier. This increase in mortality was attributed to a trend for less strict patient selection over the last few years.

We wish to support the findings of the above study by providing the results of a prospective audit we conducted in another hospital in the UK over the same period. All patients that received PEG in our hospital over a period of 38 months (May 1999 to June 2002) were followed up until reversion to oral feeding or until death. Seventy-three patients received PEG (mean age 71.7 years). The indications for PEG insertion were: cerebrovascular accident (CVA) 56.1%; non-CVA dementia 30.1%; other organic neurological diseases 11%; malignancy-associated anorexia 1.4%; neck cancer 1.4%.

Overall mortality over the follow-up period was 64.4%. In specific, early mortality (within 4 weeks) was 23.3%, mid-term mortality (4-8 weeks) 11% and late mortality (>8 weeks) 30.1%. Causes of death were: chest infection 83%; myocardial infarction 4%; congestive cardiac failure 6.4%; pulmonary embolism 2.1%; progression of pre-existing malignancy 2.1%. Mortality was 82% for patients with non-CVA dementia and 54% for patients with CVA, P = 0.05. No differences were found in survival and in complication rate between patients discharged home (11 patients) and those referred to nursing homes or long-term hospital care (26 patients).

In conclusion, 30-day mortality following PEG insertion is high in British hospitals. Our findings are remarkably similar to the findings of Janes et al .[1] Local and national guidelines on indications for PEG insertion need to be developed. Based on these guidelines a local multidisciplinary team should assess individually each request for PEG insertion.



 
 :: References Top

1.Janes SE, Price CS, Khan S. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: 30-day mortality trends and risk factors. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:23-9.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Lang A. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:28-9.  Back to cited text no. 2    



This article has been cited by
1 A better method for preventing infection of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
Kuo CH, Hu HM, Tsai PY, et al.
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY. 2008; 12(2): 358-363
[Pubmed]
2 A survey of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in 202 Japanese medical institutions
Suzuki, Y., Urashima, M., Ninomiya, H., Sowa, M., Hiki, Y., Suzuki, H., Ishibashi, Y., et al
Japan Medical Association Journal. 2006; 49(3): 94-105
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow