Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 1509  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::  Article in PDF (81 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4294    
    Printed88    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded123    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


 


 
LETTERS
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 51  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 153

Authors' Reply


Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500, Karachi, Pakistan

Correspondence Address:
Syed Ahsan Raza
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500, Karachi
Pakistan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 16006718

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions




How to cite this article:
Tayeb M, Raza SA, Khan M R, Azami R. Authors' Reply. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:153

How to cite this URL:
Tayeb M, Raza SA, Khan M R, Azami R. Authors' Reply. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2005 [cited 2019 Sep 23];51:153. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2005/51/2/153/16389


Sir,

We appreciate the comments by Dr. Bhattacharya on our paper to identify the risk factors for conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC). Male gender though pointed out as a major risk factor for conversion; was not identified in our study[1] as a potential risk factor. Hence, we did not include it in the final multivariate model. The goal of our analysis using logistic regression was to present the best fitting yet the most parsimonious model describing the independent relationship of factors with conversion to OC. The criteria for selection of possible factors was based on a p value of less than 0.25 on univariate analysis,[2] and therefore 'gender' was not a good variable to be selected ( P value = 0.39) for the final model. Use of p value of 0.25 as a screening criterion for selection of candidate factor is based on work by Mickey and Greenland on logistic regression. These authors have shown that the use of a more traditional P value of 0.05 on univariate analysis often fails to identify the factors that are known to be important.[3],[4]

Dr. Bhattacharya has in fact extended and clarified other potential risk factors for OC very well. We believe that well-designed trials are needed that will present these risk factors in a more lucid way.



 
 :: References Top

1.Tayeb M, Ahsan RS, Khan MR, Azami R. Conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy : Multivariate analysis of preoperative risk factors. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:17-20.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW, Jr. A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 1982;115:92-106.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Greenland S, Mickey RM. Re: The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 1989;130:1066.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Mickey RM, Greenland S. The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:125-37.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow