Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 22287  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::Related articles
 ::  Article in PDF (309 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  Abstract
 ::  Materials and Me...
 ::  Results
 ::  Discussion
 ::  Acknowledgments
 ::  References
 ::  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed15665    
    Printed178    
    Emailed6    
    PDF Downloaded306    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 53  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 27-33

The role of family configuration in early childhood intellectual development in the context of an extended family system in Pakistan


1 Nutrition and Public Health Intervention Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Epidemiology and Biostatistics Division, Department of Community Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
2 Division of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, 100 Conrad Hall, East Lansing, USA
3 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Division, Department of Community Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan

Date of Submission28-Sep-2005
Date of Decision19-Mar-2006
Date of Acceptance10-Oct-2006

Correspondence Address:
B I Avan
Nutrition and Public Health Intervention Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Epidemiology and Biostatistics Division, Department of Community Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.30324

Rights and Permissions


 :: Abstract 

Context: The confluence theory of intelligence by Zajonc and Markus emphasizes that individual intellectual difference of children manifests itself in the context of family configuration. Instead of assuming its generalizability, careful scientific work is required before applying the model to South Asian cultures where, predominantly, an extended family type exists. Aims: To assess the role of extended family configuration on the child's intellectual development in a South Asian setting. Settings and Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 4-5-year-old preschool children residing in Karachi, Pakistan. Materials and Methods: Three hundred and forty-two child and mother dyads were assessed through a validated cognitive psychometric tool and through a structured questionnaire. Children who were registered at the main Mother and Child Health Centres (MCH) of the Aga Khan Health Services, Pakistan (AKHSP) Karachi and who were born between July 1st 1993-June 30th 1994 with traceable birth records at the maternity homes, were considered for this study. Statistical Analysis: Multivariate linear regression models were used to identify the individual effect of family configuration on the intellectual scores. Results: Family configuration variables such as number of co-residents ( P < 0.05) and the number of siblings ( P < 0.01) in the house were significantly correlated with the psychometric score. Even after controlling for gender, socio-economic status, birth order and birth intervals, significant differentials were observed in favor of an extended family system on a child's intellectual development. Conclusion: The findings suggest the positive role of co-residents of an extended family environment on the intellectual development in early childhood.


Keywords: Child development, cognition, early childhood, extended family system, family configuration, intelligence


How to cite this article:
Avan B I, Rahbar M H, Raza S A. The role of family configuration in early childhood intellectual development in the context of an extended family system in Pakistan. J Postgrad Med 2007;53:27-33

How to cite this URL:
Avan B I, Rahbar M H, Raza S A. The role of family configuration in early childhood intellectual development in the context of an extended family system in Pakistan. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2007 [cited 2019 Nov 15];53:27-33. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2007/53/1/27/30324


Social environment plays an important role in the mental development of a child.[1],[2],[3],[4] Issues pertaining to a child's cognitive development have largely been ignored in South Asian countries and factors identified as an impediment to development have mostly been identified in western contexts.[5] Due to a lack of indigenous models, Western models and theories relating to child cognitive development have been adopted[6] in South Asian countries including Pakistan, despite the unique social circumstances prevalent in these countries.

Child development has been studied with various conceptual frameworks and strategies.[7],[8],[9] The confluence theory of intelligence[10],[11],[12] offers a unique perspective among them as it states that the intellectual growth of every member of a family is interdependent and an individual's growth rate is a function of the family configuration. The mean of the absolute intellectual or mental age level of all the family members indicates intellectual environment at home. The theory proposes a cyclical relationship with the intellectual environment at home affecting the intellectual development of each child, which in turn affects the mean intellectual level of the family. The child's intellectual development is dependent upon family size, inter-sibling interval and birth order as a function of time. As mature members leave or are added to a family, pronounced changes occur in the intellectual environment. Birth order does not act independently but as a confounding variable for mediating the effects of family size and inter-sibling interval differences. The family size increases with short inter-sibling intervals, resulting in the mean intellectual environment decreasing for younger children.[11],[13],[14] The underlying assumption of this theory is that the influence of family members is mediated through social interactions at home. Another premise is that social interactions are conducive to the development of a child's intelligence. Although this theory does not consider the nature of these interactions or even genetic contributions directly, numerous inferences have been drawn and empirically validated, which contribute to an understanding of child cognitive development.[15] Almost all of this research has been conducted in developed countries and the main findings are: family size is inversely associated with the intellectual development of children, with the association being more prominent in disadvantaged compared to privileged economical groups; family size affects verbal more than the nonverbal aspect of the cognitive development; close birth spacing among children has an unfavorable affect on IQ irrespective of birth order.[16],[17],[18]

The generality of these conclusions for other cultures with different family structures cannot be assumed and careful scientific work is required.[12],[17],[18],[19] Family size is a significant component of the theory, but family composition changes with change in the socio-cultural settings. Developed countries have a predominantly nuclear family type; literature on the child ecosystem based on the confluence theory may not be readily generalized to the developing world without scientific evaluation. In contrast to the nuclear family trend in developed countries that resulted from the rapid industrialization and urbanization in the latter half of the 20th century, the majority of the populations in developing countries, particularly in Asia, continue to follow the pattern of extended family households.[20],[21],[22] Interestingly, nuclear family is not a unique phenomenon in the West anymore; the proportion of extended family setup is on the rise due to various social and economic reasons.[22] Extended household includes other kin in addition to the members of the nuclear family hereafter called as co-residents pre-empts a systematic evaluation of its influence in the context of confluence theory in a developing world setting.

The specific objectives of this study were to evaluate the propositions related to the theory of confluence of intelligence in a Pakistani setting, primarily to assess the role of the extended family in the intellectual development of the child. In addition, cultural differences such as gender differentials during child rearing and access to family resources are important to control for while evaluating the role of the extended family system. Moreover, the potential effects of the inter-sibling birth interval and birth order should also be controlled for while assessing the role of the extended family system configuration on the child's intellectual development. It has been shown that the effects of family size are independent of economic status.[10] However, features of poverty of Western families may not be necessarily comparable to an environment in which a child grows up with relatively few resources.[23] Hence socio-economic status also needs to be controlled for in the analysis.


 :: Materials and Methods Top


Participants

This research is part of a larger cross-sectional study designed to assess factors associated with the cognitive competence of children between four to five years of age in Karachi, Pakistan. The study was conducted in the area served by the Aga Khan Health Services of Pakistan (AKHSP), as there is a well-established and organized health delivery system which serves a conglomeration of diverse racial and ethnic populations such as Sindhis, Punjabis, Gilgitis and related, as well as immigrants from India, mostly Gujaratis.

Children who were registered at the main Mother and Child Health Centres (MCH) of the AKHSP Karachi and were born between July 1st 1993-June 30th 1994 with traceable birth records at the maternity homes, were considered for this study. Children having an incomplete address on the MCH records were excluded. Twins, adopted children or those diagnosed as severely mentally retarded were also excluded. Refusal rate was negligible (0.06%) and the required information was collected on 342 children.

Study apparatus

Background of the psychometric test used for cognitive assessment

Children of ages four to five years were evaluated by the "test of intellectual development for Pakistani preschool children" devised and validated by the National Institute of Psychology Islamabad, Pakistan.[24] The validation consisted of selecting the subtests of intellectual development on the basis of an extensive literature search focusing on the Bailey Scales of Infant Development and Piagetian concepts and cultural relevance. They carried out further selection of subtests in three phases. First tryout study consisting of 13 subtests was conducted on 20 children; subtests having high or low facility were dropped. The second tryout study consisted of 11 subtests and was conducted on 100 children to find out the psychometric characteristics of the subtests. The final tryout study was conducted on about 1000 children to establish the reliability and validity of the test and also to develop the norms. The finalized test has eight sub-tests: Color naming, reasoning, seriation, verbal memory, pictorial memory, perceptual motor skills, one to one correspondence and conversation. Each subtest contains different test items. For example, the materials required for the "reasoning" subset are seven standardized pictures, each having three to four objects which differ in use, size and classification. The first two pictures are used for demonstration and are not scored. Each picture is individually presented to the child, who is required to point to the picture, that doesn't belong to the others or is different from the rest. Each picture is scored as 0 or 1, resulting in total score=5. The maximum score for each subtest is "5", except for the "conversation" where the maximum score is "10". The possible score of the intellectual evaluation range is between "0" and "45". This is the first research-based article using this instrument.

In the original test, the scaling was done on the basis of percentile ranks for 3 monthly age groups. The test was developed and validated for Pakistani children, but normative ranking was developed in a different region of Pakistan as compared to the study site. Therefore for this study, we have used original scores rather than the normative scores while controlling for age. Higher score means better intellectual status of the child.

Questionnaire for maternal interview

A structured questionnaire in Urdu was used to collect information on family configuration and socio-economic status as well as other potential factors associated with the intellectual development of the child. Pretesting of the questionnaire was done at the pediatric ward and clinics of the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH).

The variables considered for the assessment of family configuration included the total number of family members and siblings, birth order and inter-sibling birth intervals. Family type was considered as 'nuclear' or 'extended' on the basis of the configuration of its members. A nuclear family was defined as parents and siblings of the index child, while any additional members would make it an extended family. These members in the family, as stated earlier, are termed co-residents for the purpose of this study.

Procedure

Based on the information provided by the staff at the main MCH centers, it was estimated that it would be possible to locate about 300-400 registered children during the study period. All children who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Information was collected from the mother and the child dyad. The assessors underwent three weeks of intensive training on the theoretical and practical aspects of the study. Data collection was done in the following sequence:

Eligible children were contacted at their residences, verbal consent was obtained from mothers after providing information regarding the objectives of the proposed study, mothers and children were requested to come to respective MCH centers at specified times.

In the MCH centre, one assessor took the psychometric test and the second assessor collected information from the mother. Mostly, the mother and child were assessed simultaneously to prevent prompting or any other help from the mother. The principal investigator supervised the data collection and monitored over 90% of the interviews. Assessors followed standardized instructions to maintain the uniformity of procedures. Furthermore, to minimize intra-observer variability, interviewers were trained, cross-examined and briefed about the details of procedure on a weekly basis.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic and socio-economic characteristics of our sample. All associations between the dependent variable and the family configuration and socio-economic status were analyzed, controlling for effect of age of the index child on the actual test scores.

Multivariate linear regression models were used to identify the individual effect of the family configuration and socio-economic status on the intellectual scores. Multicollinearity and interactions were duly checked. Finally, two models were fitted to test the theory of confluence in our setting. Statistical tests were performed at 5% level of significance. EpiInfo 6.0 and SPSS 11.0 were used for data analysis.

Reliability and validation of psychometric measurements

Content validity of the instrument is adequate as it was based on well-established literature, cultural relevance and was scientifically validated in Pakistan. [Table - 1] shows economic status, gender and age variables that were used for concurrent validation of the psychometric measurements based on our study sample. There were no significant gender differences in terms of the mean intellectual scores. In addition, the mean intellectual scores demonstrated an upward trend as age increased. The results shown in [Table - 1] support the concurrent validity of the psychometric measurements. The predictive validity could not be established due to an absence of a uniform national standard for annual assessment of these preschool children.

The reliability of cognitive assessment was estimated by examining the internal consistency of the items as shown in [Table - 2]. Almost all the correlation coefficients between pairs of subsets are significantly associated, while the Cronbach's alpha for the overall test was 0.70.


 :: Results Top


The mean age of the study sample was 55.34 months. Boys comprised 48% of our sample. The cognitive scores of the children had an approximate normal distribution with a mean of 24.36 and standard deviation of 6.37 (median: 25, mode: 27). Description of the key features of the family background and configuration are summarized in [Table - 3]a and b respectively.

[Table - 4] shows that among the family configuration variables, number of co-residents ( P < 0. 05) and the number of siblings, ( P <0.01), were significantly correlated with the intellectual scores. Socio-economic variables such as maternal education ( P < 0.01) and father's occupation ( P <0. 01), were significantly associated with the intellectual scores. Significant associations were also found between the poor economic class ( P <0.01), house ownership ( P <0. 01), mode of family transport ( P <0.01) and psychometric scores of the children.

Finally, the effects of family configuration on the intellectual score, while adjusting for socio-economic status, were assessed using multiple linear regression models [Table - 5]. In the first model, child's sex, age, maternal education and the socio-economic status of the family were controlled. The effect of the number of siblings showed a significant negative association with the child's intellectual score, while the association between the number of co-residents and the intellectual scores was also statistically significant but positive. In the next model, when rank of the index child and birth interval between the index child and adjacent siblings were also introduced in the model, the effect of the number of co-residents and the number of siblings on the child's intellectual scores remained significant, showing robustness.


 :: Discussion Top


The main finding observed in our study is that a direct association exists between the intellectual development of children and the number of co-residents in the family. To the best of our knowledge, the role of the extended family system on the cognitive development of children in the context of the theory of confluence of intelligence has not been investigated elsewhere.

The extended family setup in South Asia, commonly referred to as the "joint family" has a patri-focal ideology, as co-residents in the family are mainly paternal relatives; propinquity is not only physical, but also at a functional and emotional level.[20],[25] These households are characterized by a high level of intergenerational-shared residence and exchange of knowledge and practice. The co-residents' role is central in terms of the availability of additional valuable support and assistance for the child's wellbeing in the family. For the most part, relatively younger members (aunts, cousins) are involved in the provision of extensive help and direct care of the child, while relatively older members (grandparents, uncles) are primarily of indirect help by providing affection to the child and giving relevant advice to the parents.[20] They have more free time to interact with the child resulting in emotional support, sensory stimulation and various learning experiences.[26],[27],[28],[29],[30]

As an additional support to this finding, most of the literature in South Asia reports mental health problems to be significantly less common in the extended family than in the nuclear family.[31],[32] But it is important to note that there have been negative effects reported on the mental health of the mothers in extended family systems.[33]

Birth order showed a marginally significant effect ( P = 0.06) on the intellectual development of a child in the bivariate analysis. When birth order was introduced in the multivariate model, this effect was diminished in the presence of age, socio-economic status and birth interval. However, the effect of the number of co-residents remained consistently positive for the cognitive status of the child. In literature, there are conflicting observations regarding the role of birth order on the intellectual status of the child.[10],[12],[34],[35],[36] Zajonc and Markus' confluence theory of intelligence argues that birth order effects are mediated through inter-sibling birth intervals and family size. If family size increases with decreasing inter-sibling intervals, then average intellectual environment decreases for children of later birth order and vice versa. The average family size in our study was 5.75 persons with a mean birth interval of 1.78 years. We have evaluated this potential interactive effect by including the relevant interaction term between the birth order and other variables in the model but none of these interactions were found statistically significant. However, this could be due to large family sizes and relatively small immediate inter-sibling differences.

Our finding of an inverse relation between the intellectual development and the number of siblings, persistently demonstrated in the statistical models, is consistent with other studies.[37],[38],[39],[40],[41] It is interesting to note that number of children consistently has the opposite effect on the child cognitive development as compared to the number of co-residents. Additional children in a family might limit the amount of resources available. Furthermore, an increase in the number of children would also limit the amount of interactions with the adults. This could result in less sensory stimulation being available through interaction with mature family members. It seems that the number of siblings is a better variable for extended family configuration for predicting children's intellectual status as compared to the birth order and the inter-sibling interval. In addition, the effect of the number of siblings is markedly increased when confounding effect of the other two is controlled.

The child's home environment is influenced by the socio-economic status, which has many facets such as parental education, parental occupation and family income. Our finding of an association between the economic class and intellectual status of the child is consistent with other studies,[42],[43],[44] which argue that perhaps it translate into the provision of more intellectually stimulating materials for a child at home.[45] Being significant confounders for our primary hypothesis, these variables were controlled in all the three statistical models.

In summary, the purpose of this study was to apply and expand the theory of confluence of intelligence in a different setting; findings support that the theory is by and large valid in the extended family configuration. This relates to the important implication that since the proportion of mothers expected to join the labor force is increasing, the role of co-residents in providing an intact family social system of care for all members, especially children is expected to increase.[46] Currently, even in the West, extensive involvement of co-residents, in care-giving to the child, is a frequent observable phenomenon irrespective of the ethnicity or socio-economic differentials. Such significant demographic transition and socio-cultural change needs further exploration, especially in relation to elder co-residents and child development.[47]

Confluence theory does not address the interactions between the co-residents directly, consequently such evaluation was beyond the scope of the study. However, the study findings certainly provide impetus to the fact that the complex network of relationships and social bonds among the co-residents, index child, parents and siblings should be qualitatively explored in the context of the extended family system.[17],[48] In addition, the quality of childcare provided by co-residents as compared to parental care requires further investigation.

It should also be kept in mind that our study was based on a cross-sectional design. Therefore, one should be careful in drawing inferences regarding the causality or temporality of the associations reported for which panel studies are more relevant. There are also certain assumptions and limitations in using the multivariate regression analysis in predicting a fleeting glance of a child's intellectual development, which is a constantly dynamic process,[12] while intellectual maturation takes a sigmoid function overtime.[14]


 :: Acknowledgments Top


This research was supported by the Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan and International Maternal and Child Health Research Training program from the Fogarty International Centre, USA. We take this opportunity to specially thank Dr. Camer W. Vellani (Distinguished Professor, The Aga Khan University), Dr. Thomas Martin (Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology), Bushra Khan (Lecturer, University of Karachi), Dr. Riffat Moazzam Zaman (Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, The Aga Khan University), Dr. Saima Akhund (Fellow in Public Health, The Aga Khan University) and all other faculty and staff who have supported us in this research study[49].

 
 :: References Top

1.Bronfebrenner U. The ecology of cognitive development. Research models and fugitive findings. In : Wozniak RH, Wozniak RM, editor. Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillside; 1993. p. 3-44.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Bronfenbrenner U. Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical models and operational models. In : Friedman SL WT, editor. Measuring environment across the life span: Emerging methods and concepts. 1st ed. American Psychological Association: New York; 1999. p. 3-30.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of developmental process. In : WD, editor. Handbook of child psychology. 5th ed. Wiley and Sons: New York; 2000. p. 993-1028.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Anderson J. Cognitive psychology and its implications. 4th ed. H Freeman. New York; 1995.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Brand CR. The importance of intelligence in western societies. J Biosoc Sci 1996;28:387-404.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.Mishra RC. A cross-cultural perspective on cognitive development theories used in Indian setting. Psychol Dev Soc J 1998;10:21-33.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Thomas RM. Comparing theories of child development. Wadsworth: Belmont, CA; 2004.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Thomas RM. Recent Theories of Human Development. Sage Publications Inc: Thousand Oaks, CA; 2000.   Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Gardner HP. Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. Basic Books: New York; 1993.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Zajonc RB, Markus H, Markus GB. The birth order puzzle. J Pers Soc Psychol 1979;37:1325-41.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  
11.Zajonc RB. Validating the confluence model. Psychol Bull 1983;93:481-512.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Zajonc RB. The family dynamics of intellectual development. Am Psychol 2001;56:490-6.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
13.Zajonc RB. Family configuration and intelligence. Science 1976;192:227-36.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Berbaum ML, Moreland RL. Intellectual development within transracial adoptive families: retesting the confluence model. Child Dev 1985;56:207-18.  Back to cited text no. 14  [PUBMED]  
15.McCall RB. The confluence model and theory. Child Dev 1985;56:217-8.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Heer DM. Effect of sibling number on child outcome. Ann Rev Soc 1985;11:27-47.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Blake J. Family size and the quality of children. Demography 1981;18:421-42.  Back to cited text no. 17  [PUBMED]  
18.Steelman LC, Doby JT. Family size and birth order as factors on the IQ performance of black and white children. Sociol Educ 1983;56:101-9.  Back to cited text no. 18  [PUBMED]  
19.Davis DJ, Cahan S, Bashi J. Birth order and intellectual development: The confluence model in the light of cross-cultural evidence. Science 1977;196:1470-2.  Back to cited text no. 19  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
20.Seymour SC. Women, family and child care in India: A world in transition. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Britannica FE. Encyclopedia Brinnica Premium Service. 2005.  Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Sylva K. Critical periods in childhood learning. Br Med Bull 1997;53:185-97.  Back to cited text no. 22  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
23.Durkin MS, Hasan ZM, Hasan KZ. Prevalence and correlates of mental retardation among children in Karachi, Pakistan. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:281-8.  Back to cited text no. 23  [PUBMED]  
24.Israr N, Abbas I. Test of intellectual development for Pakistani preschool children: Development and validation. National Institute of Psychology (NIP): Islamabad, Pakistan; 1990.  Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Sharma M, Srivastav A. The family, social network and mental health. In : Research on families with problem in India: Issues and implications. Tata Institute of Social Sciences: Mumbai; 1991. p. 68-78.  Back to cited text no. 25    
26.Kornhaber A, Woodword, KL. An agenda for grandparents. In : Kornhaber A, editor. Grandparents/Grandchildren: The vital connection. Doubleday/Anchor Press: New York; 1983.  Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Kornhaber A. The role of grandparents. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 1983;22:310-1.  Back to cited text no. 27  [PUBMED]  
28.Kornhaber A. Grandparenting: Normal and pathological-A preliminary communication from the Grandparent Study. J Geriatr Psychiatry 1986;19:19-37.  Back to cited text no. 28  [PUBMED]  
29.Gassier J. The major stages of socialisation. In : A guide to the psycho-motor development of the child. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh; 1985. p. 72-105.  Back to cited text no. 29    
30.Kornhaber A. Contemporary gandparenting. Sage Publications Inc: London; 1995.  Back to cited text no. 30    
31.Bharat S. Research on family structures and problems: Review, implications and suggestions. In : Unit of family studies TIoSS, editor. Research on families with problem in India: Issues and implications. Tata Institute of Social Sciences: Mumabi; 1991. p. 33-67.  Back to cited text no. 31    
32.Chopra H. Family structure, dynamics and psychiatric disorders in India. Indian J Psychiatry 1984;30:48-54.  Back to cited text no. 32    
33.Khalid R. Mental health of Pakistani women and their children living in extended and nuclear families. In : National conference on new directions in research for women. The Aga Khan University: Karachi; 1997.  Back to cited text no. 33    
34.Rodgers JL, Cleveland HH, van den Oord E, Rowe DC. Resolving the debate over birth order, family size and intelligence. Am Psychol 2000;55:599-612.  Back to cited text no. 34  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
35.Rodgers JL, Cleveland HH, van den Oord E, Rowe DC. Birth order and intelligence: Together again for the last time? Am Psychol 2001;56:523-4.  Back to cited text no. 35  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
36.Rodgers JL. What causes birth order-intelligence patterns? The admixture hypothesis, revived. Am Psychol 2001;56:505-10.  Back to cited text no. 36    
37.Masud SP, Luster T, Youatt J. Predictors of home environment and cognitive competence during early childhood in Pakistan. Early Child Dev Care 1994;100:43-55.  Back to cited text no. 37    
38.Blake J. Number of siblings, family background and the process of educational attainment. Soc Biol 1986;33:5-21.  Back to cited text no. 38  [PUBMED]  
39.Blake J. Number of siblings and educational attainment. Science 1989;245:32-6.  Back to cited text no. 39  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
40.Blake J. Number of siblings and personality. Fam Plan Perspect 1991;23:272-4.  Back to cited text no. 40  [PUBMED]  
41.Downey DB. Number of siblings and intellectual development. The resource dilution explanation. Am Psychol 2001;56:497-504.  Back to cited text no. 41    
42.Broman SH, Kennedy WA. Preschool IQ: Prenatal and early development correlate. Halsted Press; New Jersey; 1975.  Back to cited text no. 42    
43.Douglas JD. The home and school: A study of ability and attainment in the primary school. MacGibbon and Kee: London; 1964.  Back to cited text no. 43    
44.Pugh G. Contemporary issue in early years: Working collaboratively for children. 3rd ed. Paul Chapman Publications: London; 2001.  Back to cited text no. 44    
45.Crane JK. Effects of home environment, SES and maternal test scores on mathematics achievement. J Educ Res 1996;89:305-14.  Back to cited text no. 45    
46.Chang TP. Implications of changing family structures on old age support in the ESCAP region. Asia Pac Pop J 1992;7:49-66.  Back to cited text no. 46    
47.Fuller-Thomson E, Minkler M. American grandparents providing extensive child care to their grandchildren: Prevalence and profile. Gerontologist 2001;41:201-9.  Back to cited text no. 47  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
48.Wilson MN. Child development in the context of black family. American Psychologist 1989;44:380-5.   Back to cited text no. 48    
49.Fuller-Thomson E, Minkler M, Driver D. A profile of grandparents raising grandchildren in the United States. Gerontologist 1997;37:406-11.  Back to cited text no. 49  [PUBMED]  


    Tables

[Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3], [Table - 4], [Table - 5]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow