Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 2643  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::  Article in PDF (39 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4834    
    Printed84    
    Emailed4    
    PDF Downloaded301    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal


 


 
GUEST EDITORIAL
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 53  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 155

Sedation, spinal anesthesia and older patients


Department of Anesthesiology, South Infirmary-Victoria University Hospital, Cork, Ireland

Correspondence Address:
S Mannion
Department of Anesthesiology, South Infirmary-Victoria University Hospital, Cork
Ireland
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.33854

Rights and Permissions




How to cite this article:
Mannion S. Sedation, spinal anesthesia and older patients. J Postgrad Med 2007;53:155

How to cite this URL:
Mannion S. Sedation, spinal anesthesia and older patients. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2007 [cited 2020 Mar 30];53:155. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2007/53/3/155/33854


The main uses of sedation in regional anesthesia are to reduce anxiety and improve patient comfort and cooperation. [1] Although spinal anesthesia provides anesthesia of the surgical site, unpleasant and uncomfortable patient experiences result from having to remain in the same position, prolonged duration of surgery or ambient noise in the operating room. Patients may desire amnesia or reduced awareness of the surgical event.

These benefits come at a price though and all anesthesiologists are familiar with complications such as delayed recovery, airway obstruction, hypoxia, hypotension and midazolam-associated paradoxical excitation.

Propofol and midazolam are the commonest agents used for sedation. In older patients undergoing spinal anesthesia, concerns regarding adverse cardiovascular effects or prolonged sedation from altered pharmacokinetics are of particular interest. Martin et al., in a retrospective study of 30,842 anesthetic cases, demonstrated that for every decade after 40 years there is approximately an 8% decrease in the dose of propofol or midazolam used by anesthesiologists. [2] These dosage requirements are based on perceptions of probable pharmacokinetics in older patients as there is a lack of prospective information regarding propofol and midazolam use for sedation in older patients receiving spinal anesthesia.

This deficit has been somewhat addressed by the study reported in this edition of the Journal comparing propofol (bolus 0.4 mg/kg; infusion 3 mg/kg/hr) with midazolam (bolus 0.02 mg/kg-1 ; infusion 0.06 mg/kg/hr) in patients older than 60 years of age, undergoing urological surgery with spinal anesthesia. [3] The authors demonstrated that propofol results in faster onset (13.0 ± 4.2 vs. 18.8 ± 4.2 min) and offset times (8.9 ± 2.8 vs. 12.5 ± 3.5 min) with greater duration of adequate sedation (44.7 ± 12.5 vs. 29.8 ± 12.9%) than midazolam. However, patients receiving propofol were three times more likely to have a hypotensive episode (50% vs. 14.3%, P=0.003).

There have been few studies that have compared the sedative effects of titrated infusions of propofol and midazolam. White and Negus compared variable-rate maintenance infusions of midazolam (8.6 ± 5.4 mg/hr) with propofol (265 ± 185 mg/hr) following a loading dose, in patients undergoing elective surgery under a variety of regional anesthesia techniques. [4] Although propofol was less sedating, with fewer episodes of drowsiness, confusion or clumsiness, discharge times were similar in the two groups. Wilson et al. demonstrated that a mean infusion rate of 3.63 mg/kg/hr propofol compared with 0.26 mg/kg/hr for midazolam in 40 patients with spinal anesthesia, resulted in more rapid recovery, as judged by the ability to eye open and recall their date of birth. Amnesia, as in White and Negus' study, was significantly greater after midazolam. There were no differences in hemodynamic parameters, however, the average patient age was 55 years compared with 70 years in the present study.

Therefore, although propofol results in faster, smoother and more predictable sedation with reduced short-term cognitive impairment, older patients are at greater risk of hypotension. Aiming for a lower level of sedation (score of 4 on the modified Observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale) may reduce this incidence. Unfortunately, in this study, only the patient and not the investigator were blinded to the treatment protocols and hence sedation targets; this may have introduced bias. It is also important to note that with both techniques there was a 25% incidence of airway obstruction requiring intervention.

Finally, the authors only studied recovery from sedation and did not investigate the effects of either drug on psychomotor or postoperative cognitive function. [5] This would have been of great interest as we know that elderly patients recover from the sedative effects of propofol in a similar manner to younger patients but demonstrate delayed recovery of psychomotor function - a factor that may prolong postoperative stay.[6]

 
 :: References Top

1.Hu P, Harmon D, Frizelle H. Patient comfort during regional anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2007;19:67-74.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
2.Martin G, Glass PS, Breslin DS, MacLeod DB, Sanderson IC, Lubarsky DA, et al . A study of anesthetic drug utilization in different age groups. J Clin Anesth 2003;15:194-200.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
3.Yaddanapudi S, Batra YK, Balagopal A, Nagdeve NG. Sedation in patients above 60 years of age undergoing urological surgery under spinal anaesthesia: Comparison of propofol and midazolam infusions. J Postgrad Med 2007;53:171-5.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.White PF, Negus JB. Sedative infusions during local and regional anesthesia: A comparison of midazolam and propofol. J Clin Anesth 1991;3:32-9.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  
5.Wilson E, David A, MacKenzie N, Grant IS. Sedation during spinal anaesthesia: comparison of propofol and midazolam. Br J Anaesth 1990;64:48-52.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.Shinozaki M, Usui Y, Yamaguchi S, Okuda Y, Kitajima T. Recovery of psychomotor function after propofol sedation is prolonged in the elderly. Can J Anaesth 2002;49:927-31.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]



This article has been cited by
1 Bispectral Index, Sedation, Spinal Anesthesia and Mortality
Stephen Mannion,Peter Lee
Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2014; 118(5): 906
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Combined Lumbar Spinal and Thoracic High-Epidural Regional Anesthesia as an Alternative to General Anesthesia for High-Risk Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery
James Skipworth,Attavar Srilekha,Dimitri Raptis,David O’Callaghan,Siri Siriwardhana,Romi Navaratnam
World Journal of Surgery. 2009; 33(9): 1809
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Combined lumbar spinal and thoracic high-epidural regional anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia for high-risk patients undergoing gastrointestinal and colorectal surgery
Skipworth, J., Srilekha, A., Raptis, D., OęCallaghan, D., Siriwardhana, S., Navaratnam, R.
World Journal of Surgery. 2009; 33(9): 1809-1814
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
© 2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow