Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 3779  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::  Article in PDF (56 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3758    
    Printed43    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded195    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


 


 
LETTER
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 54  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 60

Snap sound and detumescence: Fracture penis


Department of Urology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India

Correspondence Address:
R Mongha
Department of Urology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.39201

Rights and Permissions




How to cite this article:
Mongha R, Kundu A K. Snap sound and detumescence: Fracture penis. J Postgrad Med 2008;54:60

How to cite this URL:
Mongha R, Kundu A K. Snap sound and detumescence: Fracture penis. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2008 [cited 2019 Nov 19];54:60. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2008/54/1/60/39201


Sir,

I read with interest the article by the authors, Rao A, Surendrababu. [1]

It is a straightforward case of penile fracture with typical history and presentation. Patient described a cracking sound during intercourse followed by pain, detumescence, discoloration, and swelling of penile shaft. Patient should have been immediately explored and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was not required in this case.

In cases of penile fracture, if the Bucks fascia remains intact penile hematoma remains confined within skin and tunica resulting in typical ("eggplant deformity"), a sign that is highly diagnostic. [2] If the Bucks fascia is disrupted, hematoma can extend to scrotum and perineum "butterfly sign." [3]

The typical history and clinical presentation of fracture penis usually make the adjunctive imaging studies unnecessary as was in this case. The major argument associated with the use of MRI is the time requirement involved with the study, limited availability of MRI in emergency hours, and the associated expense.

Immediate surgical reconstruction results in faster recovery, lower complication rates, and lower incidence of long-term penile curvature. Timing of surgery influences the long-term success significantly. Importance of time in penile fracture is more important as many of these patients already present late because of associated fear and embarrassment.

MRI is usually indicated in doubtful cases where there is penile swelling and ecchymoses without the classical history of snap-pop or rapid detumescence after the injury. The message in case of penile fracture should be prompt exploration and surgical repair.

 
 :: References Top

1.Rao A, Surendrababu NR. Snap sound and detumescence: Fracture penis. J Postgrad Med 2007;53:255-6.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Zargooshi J. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: Report of 172 cases. J Urol 2000;164:364-6.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
3.Gottenger EE, Wagner JR. Penile fracture with complete urethral disruption. J Trauma 2000;49:339-41.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow