Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 2446  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::Related articles
 ::  Article in PDF (909 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  Abstract
 ::  Emerging Applica...
 ::  Conclusion
 ::  Acknowledgments
 ::  References
 ::  Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5513    
    Printed222    
    Emailed7    
    PDF Downloaded144    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal


 


 
SYMPOSIUM
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 56  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 98-102

Pediatric imaging: Current and emerging techniques


Pediatric Radiology, Mass General Hospital for Children, 55 Fruit St., Ellison 237, Boston, MA 02114, USA

Date of Submission17-Feb-2010
Date of Decision30-Sep-2009
Date of Acceptance07-Jan-2010
Date of Web Publication8-Jul-2010

Correspondence Address:
M S Gee
Pediatric Radiology, Mass General Hospital for Children, 55 Fruit St., Ellison 237, Boston, MA 02114
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.65273

Rights and Permissions


 :: Abstract 

Imaging has always been an important component of the clinical evaluation of pediatric patients. Rapid technological advances in imaging are making noninvasive evaluation of a wide range of pediatric diseases possible. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are two imaging modalities that do not involve ionizing radiation and are preferred imaging modalities in the pediatric population. Computed tomography (CT) remains the imaging modality with the highest increase in utilization in children due to its widespread availability and rapid image acquisition. Emerging imaging applications to be discussed include MR urography, voiding urosonography with use of ultrasound contrast agents, CT dose reduction techniques, MR enterography for inflammatory bowel disease, and MR cine airway imaging.


Keywords: Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, pediatric radiology, ultrasound


How to cite this article:
Shenoy-Bhangle A, Nimkin K, Gee M S. Pediatric imaging: Current and emerging techniques. J Postgrad Med 2010;56:98-102

How to cite this URL:
Shenoy-Bhangle A, Nimkin K, Gee M S. Pediatric imaging: Current and emerging techniques. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Nov 14];56:98-102. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2010/56/2/98/65273


With the development and widespread availability of advanced imaging techniques, imaging has become an increasingly important component of the clinical evaluation of pediatric patients. Among imaging modalities, computed tomography (CT) has undergone some of the most explosive growth. This has been attributed to increasing availability of multi-detector CT scanners in medical centers and the ability of multidetector CT to provide rapid, high-quality image acquisition. It is estimated that 100 million CT examinations are performed annually in the world, with over 10% of examinations performed on patients under 18 years of age (reviewed in [1] ). The radiation risk for patients associated with diagnostic examinations has recently become an active area of investigation. A recent study examining the cancer risk of low-dose radiation exposure concluded that there is a non-zero risk of malignancy with radiation exposures as low as 50-100 mSv, levels that are likely to be reached in medical patients undergoing serial CT examinations over the course of their lifetimes. [2] Children in particular are known to be more sensitive to the effects of radiation than adults, [3] such that the lifetime cancer mortality risk is significantly higher for children than adults for a given radiation dose. Factors underlying this difference include longer incubation times to develop cancer, altered patient body habitus, and increased number of dividing cells. One study using linear extrapolation models to determine cancer mortality risk from pediatric CT scans estimated that the lifetime cancer risk from a single abdominal CT in a one-year-old child is 1 in 550, and that 500 children under 15 years old in the United States will die of a cancer attributable to the radiation from an abdominal or head CT exam. [4]

Because of the concern regarding radiation risks associated with CT, attention has been focused on utilizing alternate imaging modalities without ionizing radiation exposure. In this regard, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) both are commonly used in clinical practice to diagnose disease in pediatric patients. Both imaging modalities, in addition to their avoidance of ionizing radiation exposure, have superior soft tissue contrast to CT. Advantages of ultrasound include ease of performance, ability to image dynamic processes in real-time, and the lack of need for patient sedation. However, because of the limited depth of penetration and field of view, ultrasound is not an ideal screening modality and is more suited for targeted evaluation of a particular body region. MRI, like CT, is better suited as a screening tool because of its ability to provide high-resolution images of the body in three dimensions. Although MRI has historically been underutilized in children because of long scan times and motion artifacts frequently necessitating patient sedation, recent technical advances have made rapid, motion-free image acquisition possible. [5] Finally, technical innovations in scanning hardware as well as software reconstruction algorithms have led to a significant reduction in radiation dose associated with CT scanning, making CT a more attractive imaging option for children. The emerging applications in pediatric imaging discussed in this article stem from these technical innovations, as well as the general desire to diagnose pediatric diseases in a noninvasive manner.


 :: Emerging Applications Top


MR urography

MR urography is an evolving technique aimed at avoiding radiation in the pediatric population besides being noninvasive while optimizing imaging of the genitourinary tract. Some indications for this study include evaluation of congenital anatomic abnormalities, vesicoureteric reflux and obstructive uropathy with the ability to provide predictive information about which children will benefit from surgery. Technical innovations including diaphragmatic tracking, parallel or propeller imaging, faster gradients, higher field strength along with the ability to do dynamic imaging to study split renal function, glomerular filtration rate or urinary drainage improve applicability in infants and children. [6] Two types of techniques are commonly employed: 1) Static fluid or T2-weighted imaging and 2) Excretory urography or T1-weighted post-contrast imaging [Figure 1]. Static-fluid MR urography can be used to assess nonfunctioning systems and to document the course and insertion of ureters in an obstructed system. Excretory urography using saline and furosemide in conjunction with intravenous contrast administration enables evaluation of dynamic obstructions such as obstruction by a crossing vessel in the setting of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. It also enables plotting of time-signal intensity curves to assess renal function in the setting of obstruction as well as to assess vesico-ureteric reflux. [7],[8] Advantages of MR urography include avoidance of ionizing radiation and contrast media while the pitfalls include case-specific use of sedation, technical demands to produce high-quality images and artifacts that can complicate interpretation. [9]

Voiding urosonography

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a common pediatric problem. Due to the possibility of renal damage due to VUR and consequently renal function impairment and hypertension various diagnostic studies are in place to rule out this problem. Three different diagnostic modalities are currently employed in the imaging of VUR. The two radiological modalities, voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) and radionuclide cystography (RNC) have been in use for several decades. Since the mid-1990s, voiding urosonography (VUS) has been gradually emerging as a further diagnostic option for reflux. VCUG and RNC are indicated primarily in the following cases: (1) first examination for VUR in boys, (2) specific request for urethral and/or bladder imaging, (3) inadequate visualization of the bladder or one of the kidneys on US. A recent study by Papadopoulou and colleagues [10] demonstrates a radiation-free method of diagnosis and follow-up of VUR in children, using VUS with harmonic imaging (VUS-HI) in conjunction with a sonographic contrast agent. VUS-HI was performed after intravesical administration of 1 ml of a sonographic contrast agent (sulphur-hexafluoride gas microbubbles, SonoVue, Bracco, Italy). They concluded that this method had a higher sensitivity compared to VCUG, so it could be used as an alternative radiation-free imaging technique to elicit VUR. Indications for using VUS as a primary imaging modality compared to VCUG include females having a reflux examination for the first time, follow-up VUR, and screening high-risk populations. [11]

CT dose modulation

Multiple strategies have been employed to reduce radiation exposure associated with CT. [12] One approach is automatic tube current modulation, in which the X-ray beam intensity (measured as CT tube-current product) varies as a function of the particular body region being imaged. For example, in the thorax, the lung parenchyma does not attenuate X-ray photons effectively relative to solid abdominal organs. Thus, a chest CT does not require as high a tube-current product as an abdominal CT in order to obtain comparable image quality. The X-ray beam intensity can be modulated individually for each patient based on their cross-sectional anatomy in three dimensions, with angular beam modulation in the XY plane as the tube rotates about the patient and longitudinal modulation in the Z plane as the patient passes through the CT gantry. [13] Another method to reduce radiation dose is modification of CT imaging technique based on patient weight. This technique is based on the premise that multiple CT imaging parameters (tube current, voltage, pitch) can be adjusted based on the weight and cross-sectional diameter of the patient without significantly affecting image quality (reviewed in [1] ). Many institutions (including ours) have adopted the use of color-coded CT technique charts for pediatric patients based on weight and study indication, leading to decreased and less variable CT dose exposure compared with standard protocols [Figure 2]. [14],[15]

One clinical area where CT dose reduction has been implemented is during serial imaging of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunts to assess shunt patency. In a study conducted by Udayasankar and colleagues it was demonstrated that a low-dose (80mAs versus 120mAs) head CT protocol for pediatric patients undergoing follow-up scans of a shunt for hydrocephalus resulted in diagnostically acceptable images with reduction in radiation dose of approximately 63%. [16] Although image quality ratings of a low-dose study were lower than those of standard-dose scans, the quality of images was adequate for the assessment of ventricular volume and shunt patency.

MR enterography for Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a form of inflammatory bowel disease with a bimodal demographic distribution with an initial peak incidence occurring in patients 15-30 years old and a later peak in the fifth to sixth decade of life, [17] leading to a significant incidence and prevalence within the pediatric population. CD is characterized by a chronic relapsing disease, with patients often experiencing episodic symptom recurrence over their lifetime. Imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of symptomatic CD patients, including initial primary diagnosis (including presence, severity, and extent of disease), as well as determination of disease activity, therapy response, and extraintestinal complications in patients with known disease. [18],[19] Over the last decade CT has become the primary imaging modality for evaluating gastrointestinal tract pathology due to its widespread availability, fast scanning time, and ability to produce high-resolution three-dimensional images. [20] Currently, routine CT evaluation of CD includes assessment of bowel wall thickening, perienteric and pericolonic mesenteric inflammation; lymph node size and number; extraluminal collections (fistulae, abscesses, sinuses); and extraintestinal complications. [21] Although CT has proved to be an effective imaging modality for CD, one significant limitation is the ionizing radiation exposure. Recent data suggest a nonzero radiation-induced cancer risk at exposure levels as low as 50 mSv, a cumulative dose which is often exceeded in patients diagnosed with CD during childhood (Pierce DA, Radiation Res 2000) [22] ).

The recent development of MRI pulse sequences that provide motion-free, high-resolution images with T1 or T2 contrast has made MR imaging of intestinal pathology possible. [23] MRI is already in routine clinical use for detecting perianal and perirectal fistulae in IBD patients, which are very difficult to detect by CT. [24],[25] MR enterography (MR-E) is a specific MRI technique for imaging the bowel that combines large volume oral contrast distention of the bowel with intravenous gadolinium administration to increase sensitivity for detecting bowel wall abnormalities. [26] One study comparing MR enterography with fluoroscopic barium small bowel series in adult CD patients demonstrated MRI to be comparable for detection of abnormal bowel but superior for detection of extraintestinal disease. [27] Another study comparing contrast-enhanced MRI and CT in adult CD patients demonstrated MRI to be superior for detection of mild, but not severe, bowel inflammatory changes. [28] At our institution we are currently comparing MR enterography and CT enterography for evaluation of pediatric CD severity and activity [Figure 3].

MRI cine airway imaging

The cine MRI technique involves rapid imaging of a single slab of tissue to observe structural changes over time. This technique is routinely used in cardiac imaging to detect structural as well as wall motion abnormalities. More recently, cine MRI has been applied to imaging of the airway. One condition affecting the airway in children that is well-evaluated by cine MRI is obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), in which the upper airway becomes intermittently narrowed or occluded during sleep causing pauses in breathing and sleep disturbance. Indications for cine MRI in OSA patients include pre-surgical planning, persistent OSA despite surgery, and OSA associated with obesity. [29] Another condition that can be evaluated by cine airway MRI is velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), in which structural or functional abnormalities of the soft palate and pharyngeal walls inhibit normal velopharyngeal sphincter function and lead to speech disorders. [30] Cine MRI is indicated in children with speech disorders in which VPI is suspected, both to confirm the diagnosis as well as to detect anatomic abnormalities that would be amenable to surgical repair rather than speech therapy.

For cine airway MRI, a 10-15-mm image slab is selected in the sagittal midline or transverse plane, and images are acquired at a rate of 1/sec for 30-60 sec. The images are then displayed in cine format for dynamic evaluation of the oral and nasal airways, and the hypopharynx. OSA patients are imaged during conscious sedation, while VPI patients are imaged awake, at rest and during phonation. In OSA patients, dynamic imaging is used to detect narrowing or collapse of the nasopharynx or hypopharynx during respiration [Figure 4]. Additionally, the adjacent anatomic structures are evaluated to detect features predisposing to airway collapse such as tonsillar/adenoid hypertrophy, glossoptosis, and elongated soft palate/uvula. In VPI patients, dynamic imaging is used to assess the degree of motion of the pharyngeal walls and soft palate, and to evaluate VP sphincter closure. The palate is also specifically evaluated to assess for a small submucosal cleft palate that could produce VPI.


 :: Conclusion Top


In summary, increasing concern about the effects of ionizing radiation on children has prompted evaluation of alternative imaging modalities to CT for pediatric imaging such as ultrasound and MRI, which have superior soft tissue contrast to CT and can assess both anatomy and function, and are increasingly being utilized to evaluate common pediatric disorders. MR urography is an emerging application in the direction of avoiding radiation while optimizing various pediatric conditions affecting the genitourinary tract. Voiding urosonography obviates use of radiation and thus can be used in optimizing follow-up workup of reflux studies. Use of ultrasound contrast media for the same increases the sensitivity and specificity of this study. A variety of hardware and software technical innovations have led to a significant reduction in CT radiation exposure. Complications of CD can be optimally evaluated with contrast-enhanced MRI, obviating the need for barium studies and CT. Upper airway disorders, likewise, can be evaluated with cine MRI which may ultimately replace more complex, time-consuming radiographic procedures. With the rapid advances in medical imaging technology, radiology will continue to play a key role in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric diseases.


 :: Acknowledgments Top


Dr. Mukesh Harisinghani for advice and support, and Dr. Sjirk Westra for CT dose reduction images.

 
 :: References Top

1.Kalra MK, Maher MM, Rizzo S, Saini S. Radiation exposure and projected risks with multidetector-row computed tomography scanning: clinical strategies and technologic developments for dose reduction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28:S46-9.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Pierce DA, Preston DL. Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 2000;154:178-86.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Brenner DJ. Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 2002;32:228-3; discussion 242-4, 2002.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimates of the cancer risks from pediatric CT radiation are not merely theoretical: comment on "point/counterpoint: in x-ray computed tomography, technique factors should be selected appropriate to patient size. against the proposition". Med Phys 2001;28:2387-8.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.MacKenzie JD, Vasanawala SS. Advances in pediatric MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2008;16:385-402, v.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Riccabona M. (Paediatric) magnetic resonance urography: just fancy images or a new important diagnostic tool? Curr Opin Urol 2007;17:48-55.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.Leyendecker JR, Barnes CE, Zagoria RJ. MR urography: techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics 2008;28:23-46; discussion 46-27.  Back to cited text no. 7      
8.Grattan-Smith JD, Little SB, Jones RA. MR urography in children: how we do it. Pediatr Radiol 2008;38:S3-17.  Back to cited text no. 8      
9.Leyendecker JR, Clingan MJ. Magnetic resonance urography update-are we there yet? Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2009;30:246-57.  Back to cited text no. 9      
10.Papadopoulou F, Anthopoulou A, Siomou E, Efremidis S, Tsamboulas C, Darge K. Harmonic voiding urosonography with a second-generation contrast agent for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39:239-44.  Back to cited text no. 10      
11.Darge K. Diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux with ultrasonography. Pediatr Nephrol 2002;17:52-60.  Back to cited text no. 11      
12.McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for Reducing Radiation Dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am 2009;47:27-40.  Back to cited text no. 12      
13.Paterson A, Frush DP. Dose reduction in paediatric MDCT: general principles. Clin Radiol 2007;62:507-17.  Back to cited text no. 13      
14.Frush DP, Soden B, Frush KS, Lowry C. Improved pediatric multidetector body CT using a size-based color-coded format. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:721-6.  Back to cited text no. 14      
15.Kalra MK, Prasad S, Saini S, Blake MA, Varghese J, Halpern EF, et al. Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1101-6.  Back to cited text no. 15      
16.Udayasankar UK, Braithwaite K, Arvaniti M, Tudorascu D, Small WC, et al. Low-dose nonenhanced head CT protocol for follow-up evaluation of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: reduction of radiation and effect on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:802-6.  Back to cited text no. 16      
17.Friedman S, Blumberg RS. Inflammatory Bowel Disease. In: E Braunwald, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL (eds.), Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 15 edition, New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 1679-92.  Back to cited text no. 17      
18.Patak MA, Mortele KJ, Ros PR. Multidetector row CT of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am 2005;43:1063-77, viii.  Back to cited text no. 18      
19.Mackalski BA, Bernstein CN. New diagnostic imaging tools for inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2006;55:733-41.  Back to cited text no. 19      
20.Horton KM, Fishman EK. The current status of multidetector row CT and three-dimensional imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:199-212.  Back to cited text no. 20      
21.Gore RM, Balthazar EJ, Ghahremani GG, Miller FH. CT features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:3-15.  Back to cited text no. 21      
22.Brenner DJ. Should computed tomography be the modality of choice for imaging Crohn's disease in children? The radiation risk perspective. Gut 2008;57:1489-90.  Back to cited text no. 22      
23.Furukawa A, Saotome T, Yamasaki M, Maeda K, Nitta N, Takahashi M, et al. Cross-sectional imaging in Crohn disease. Radiographics 2004;24:689-702.  Back to cited text no. 23      
24.Koelbel G, Schmiedl U, Majer MC, Weber P, Jenss H, Kueper K, et al. Diagnosis of fistulae and sinus tracts in patients with Crohn disease: value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:999-1003.  Back to cited text no. 24      
25.Szurowska E, Wypych J, Izycka-Swieszewska E. Perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease: MRI diagnosis and surgical planning: MRI in fistulazing perianal Crohn's disease. Abdom Imaging 2007.  Back to cited text no. 25      
26.Fidler J. MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am 2007;45:317-31.  Back to cited text no. 26      
27.Bernstein CN, Greenberg H, Boult I, Chubey S, Leblanc C, Ryner L. A prospective comparison study of MRI versus small bowel follow-through in recurrent Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:2493-502.  Back to cited text no. 27      
28.Low RN, Francis IR, Politoske D, Bennett M. Crohn's disease evaluation: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and single-phase helical CT scanning. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:127-35.  Back to cited text no. 28      
29.Donnelly LF. Obstructive sleep apnea in pediatric patients: evaluation with cine MR sleep studies. Radiology 2005;236:768-78.  Back to cited text no. 29      
30.Atik B, Bekerecioglu M, Tan O, Etlik O, Davran R, Arslan H. Evaluation of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in assessing velopharyngeal insufficiency during phonation. J Craniofac Surg 2008;19:566-72.  Back to cited text no. 30      


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]

This article has been cited by
1 Evaluation of an initiative to reduce radiation exposure from CT to children in a non-pediatric-focused facility
Einat Blumfield,Jonathan Zember,Mark Guelfguat,Amit Blumfield,Harold Goldman
Emergency Radiology. 2015; 22(6): 631
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Comparison of Gonadal Radiation Doses From CT Enterography and Small-Bowel Follow-Through in Pediatric Patients
Janet R. Reid,Jessica Pozzuto,Stuart Morrison,Nancy Obuchowski,William Davros
American Journal of Roentgenology. 2015; 204(3): 615
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 A Teething Problem: Artefactual X-Ray Appearances of Odontoid Fracture due to Superimposed Incisor
Matthew Crocker,Maeve E. Crocker
Case Reports in Emergency Medicine. 2012; 2012: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Sleep cine magnetic resonance imaging—A dynamic evaluation of the airway
Sally R. Shott
Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2012; 23(1): 19
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Sleep cine magnetic resonance imaging-A dynamic evaluation of the airway
Shott, S.R.
Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2012; 23(1): 19-24
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
© 2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow