| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||1904 |
| Printed||78 |
| Emailed||1 |
| PDF Downloaded||10 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
| Cited by others ||2 |
Click on image for details.
|Year : 2011 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 298-301
Severe and critical cases of H1N1 influenza in pregnancy: A chinese perspective
J Liu, Q Li, H Cui, C Liu
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, China
|Date of Submission||24-Mar-2011|
|Date of Decision||31-May-2011|
|Date of Acceptance||13-Sep-2011|
|Date of Web Publication||22-Nov-2011|
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University
Source of Support: Peak Medical Research Construction Projects of Liaoning
Province, Conflict of Interest: None
Context : In 2009, an outbreak of A/H1N1 influenza spread worldwide. Following the start of winter in Liaoning province in China, the number of pregnant women infected with influenza increased significantly. Some of them developed respiratory failure and multiple organ failure. Aims : The aim of this study was to determine the high-risk factors associated with the development of critical illness in the hospitalized pregnant women with A/H1N1 infection. Settings and Design : This retrospective cohort study was carried out in the tertiary care obstetric department of a large general hospital. Materials and Methods : The clinical data of H1N1 pregnant women hospitalized from November 2009 to January 2010 was reviewed. We classified these cases into severe and critical grades according to H1N1 influenza treatment guidelines. We selected maternal age, gestational age, and the time interval between symptom-onset and hospital admission as related factors of critical illness. Statistical Analysis : Logistic regression analyses to determine the relevance and importance of factors significantly associated with critical illness. Results : Eighteen cases of H1N1 influenza pregnant women were admitted. Ten pregnant women were severe cases and eight pregnant women were critical cases. The maternal age (OR=0.979, 95% CI: 0.749~1.279)and the time interval between symptom-onset and hospital admission (OR=1.41, 95% CI: 0.917~2.169) were not found to be risk factors for critical cases. The significant risk factor associated with critical illness is gestational age (OR=53.726, 95% CI: 131.165~2477.918). The risk varied by weeks of gestation, with an odds ratio of 1.034 (95% CI: 0.968-1.106) during the first trimester, 9.667 (95% CI: 0.750-124.59) during the second trimester, and 87 (95% CI: 6.750-1121.39) during the third trimester. Conclusions : Gestational age is associated with the risk of developing critical infection. The risk increases with increasing weeks of gestation.
Keywords: China, H1N1 influenza, pregnancy, severe and critical cases
|How to cite this article:|
Liu J, Li Q, Cui H, Liu C. Severe and critical cases of H1N1 influenza in pregnancy: A chinese perspective. J Postgrad Med 2011;57:298-301
| :: Introduction|| |
In early April 2009, an outbreak of A/H1N1 influenza that began in Mexico spread worldwide. , In patients affected with influenza, pregnant women had increased morbidity and mortality compared with women who were not pregnant.  This strain of influenza affected Northern China relatively late. Following the start of winter in the Liaoning province, the number of pregnant women infected with H1N1 influenza increased significantly. Furthermore, for some, their condition deteriorated very quickly after they came to our hospital, and soon developed critical infection with respiratory failure and multiple organ failure. Prevention and treatment of critical cases became a social focus. So, it is very important to find the high-risk factors for critical illness.
| :: Materials and Methods|| |
This retrospective cohort study was carried out in the department of Obstetrics of a large general hospital after being approved by the institutional medical ethics committee. The department is a tertiary care unit for the surrounding areas and it undertakes a large number of high-risk pregnancies. The department caters to over 7000 admissions and conducts over 6000 deliveries per year. Approximately, 48% of these cases are high-risk pregnancies.
In the study, clinical data of H1N1-infected pregnant women hospitalized during 2009 to January 2010 was reviewed. The patients were classified into severe and critical grades based on their condition, according to the H1N1 influenza treatment guidelines. 
The patients were included for analysis if they were pregnant and presented with fever or acute respiratory illness, and were confirmed positive for A/H1N1 by a pharyngeal swab. Pharyngeal swabs of suspected cases visiting hospitals were collected and sent to the corresponding laboratories to detect 2009 H1N1 virus by a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay according to the US CDC protocol recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO).  Cases were classified as mild, severe and critical according to the following case definitions: 
Severe cases: Included those having at least one of the following criteria:
- High fever (more than 39°C) lasting for over three days;
- Severe cough, cough with purulent, bloody sputum or chest pain;
- Tachypnea, dyspnea or cyanosis;
- Altered mental status: Bad-response, hypersomnia, restlessness;
- Severe vomiting, diarrhea or dehydration;
- Pneumonia on radiography.
Critical cases: Included those having at least one of the following criteria:
- Respiratory failure;
- Toxic shock;
- Multiple organ dysfunctions;
- Other clinical situations necessitating intensive care management.
Mild cases: Included those infected cases not meeting any of the above criteria.
The mild cases received antiviral treatment (using antiviral drugs) in the outpatient clinic and were advised isolation at home. The severe or critical cases were hospitalized and isolated.
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software (Version 17.0, SPSS). We selected maternal age, gestational age, interval between symptom-onset and hospital admission as risk factors. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine risk factors for critical cases. The analysis compared severe and critical cases. Frequencies and percentages were used to describe the distributions of cases.
| :: Results|| |
Eighteen cases of A/H1N1 influenza pregnant women were admitted during the period of review [Table 1]. Information regarding their clinical characteristics, treatment details and outcome are summarized in [Table 2]. Ten pregnant women were severe cases and eight pregnant women were critical cases. Their age ranged from 20-39 years (median 26.8). Two (11%) of them presented in the first trimester, eight (44%) in the second trimester, and the remaining eight (44%) in the third trimester. The interval between symptom-onset and hospital admission was 0.5-15 days. Seven patients (39%) required mechanical ventilation. Three patients underwent Caesarean section with the aim to improve symptoms and oxygen saturation, although their fetuses had died in utero (at 27, 33 and 38 weeks of gestation) before coming to hospital. Six patients underwent Caesarean deliveries. All infants survived, and none of the babies had evidence of influenza. Two (11%) patients in this series died and the remaining were discharged home. After discharge, two patients underwent induced abortion for the termination of pregnancy. Other patients who did not deliver continued their pregnancy.
|Table 2: Information related to age, other clinical characteristics, treatment modalities used and outcomes|
Click here to view
We evaluated maternal age, gestational age, and the time interval between symptom-onset and hospital admission as related factors of susceptibility [Table 3]. The trimester was determined on the basis of the last menstrual cycle in patients with regular cycles and on the basis of ultrasound evidence in those with irregular cycles. In binary logistic analysis, the significant risk factor associated with critical cases compared to severe cases was gestational age (OR=53.726, 95% CI: 1.165~2477.918). But in this study, the maternal age (OR=0.979, 95% CI: 0.749~1.279)and the time interval between symptom-onset and hospital admission (OR=1.41, 95% CI: 0.917~2.169) were not found to be risk factors for critical cases.
We chose hospitalized non-pregnant female cases of A/H1N1 infected in this period as the reference group to find the relationship between gestation and critical illness. There were thirty cases of hospitalized non-pregnant female patients with A/H1N1 infected. Of the thirty patients, only one presented critical illness. We found that the risk of critical illness varied by weeks of gestation, with an odds ratio of 1.034 (95% CI: 0.968-1.106) during the first trimester, 9.667(95% CI: 0.750-124.59) during the second trimester, and 87 (95% CI: 6.750-1121.39) during the third trimester [Table 4].
|Table 4: Relationship between duration of pregnancy and probability of critical illness|
Click here to view
| :: Discussion|| |
H1N1 influenza has been identified as a cause of febrile respiratory infection. It spread throughout a world population infecting almost entirely the population susceptible to infection. ,, H1N1-infected pregnant women were shown to have increased frequency of complications and greater morbidity than the general population. , This study summarizes the severe and critical cases of 2009 H1N1 influenza in pregnancy. The study noted that gestational age was associated with higher risk of developing critical infection in our province in China. The risk increased with the weeks of gestation. Influenza increases the risk of severe respiratory diseases in pregnancy. ,, In our study, the women in the second or third trimester of pregnancy had a higher rate of developing critical infection, which is similar to that reported in the USA.  It may be related to specific immune suppression, decreased resistance and physiological changes in pregnancy. ,, If lung inflammation occurs, breathing is restricted and lung function is reduced. Blood volume increases in late pregnancy, increasing the burden on the lung, which may lead to easier deterioration. , For these reasons, we performed surgery on patients whose condition did not improve with symptomatic treatment. The purpose was to terminate the pregnancy and to ease the symptoms of hypoxia. And we found that immediate and dramatic relief of symptoms was achieved after the Caesarean section. Similar to other studies, this study also did not find a significant association between the maternal age and critical illness.
Delayed presentation to the hospital and delayed institution of anti-virus treatment have been associated the development of severe illness. ,,, When these patients have flu-like symptoms, they do not pay much attention to them and are worried about the impact drugs could have on the fetus. These concerns delay institution of treatment with disastrous consequences. As we studied only severe and critical cases in a retrospective study, we were unable to confirm this notion through our study.
Our study has some limitations. As a referral center, this department receives more sick and severely ill patients. This may have introduced a selection bias. Our data, therefore, cannot be used to estimate the overall mortality of Critical 2009 H1N1 Influenza. Secondly, the patients who died at home or at the referring hospitals were not reported, so these were lost to enumeration in the study. Moreover, there is not enough power in the study, as there were only two cases in the first trimester. This has resulted in the statistical confidence intervals being too large. It may, however, be stated that critical infection cases were associated with increasing gestational age, and the risk increases with number of weeks of gestation. Close attention should be paid to pregnant women in their second and third trimester of pregnancy to decrease associated morbidity and mortality. For critical infection cases, Caesarean section can improve the symptoms of hypoxia quickly.
| :: Acknowledgment|| |
Funding support for this research by the Peak Medical Research Construction Projects of Liaoning Province.
| :: References|| |
|1.||Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Swine influenza A (H1N1) infection in two children-Southern California. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58:400-2. |
|2.||Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team, Dawood FS, Jain S, Finelli L, Shaw MW, et al. Emergence of novel swine-origin influenza a (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med 2009;360:2605-15. |
|3.||Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Rasmussen SA, Williams JL, Swerdlow DL, Biggerstaff MS, et al. H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection during pregnancy in the USA. Lancet 2009;374:451-8. |
|4.||Yang P, Duan W, Lv M, Shi W, Peng X, Wang X, et al. Review of an influenza surveillance system, Beijing, People′s Republic of China. Emerg Infect Dis 2009;15:1603-8. |
|5.||CDC protocol of real-time RTPCR for influenza A (H1N1). World Health Organization. Available from: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/swineflu/realtimeptpcr/en/index.html. [Last accessed on 2010 Jun 25]. |
|6.||Yang P, Deng Y, Pang X, Shi W, Li X, Tian L, et al. Severe, critical and fatal cases of 2009 H1N1 influenza in China. J Infect 2010;61:277-83. |
|7.||Fraser C, Donnelly CA, Cauchemez S, Hanage WP, Van Kerkhove MD, Hollingsworth TD, et al. Pandemic potential of a strain of influenza A(H1N1): Early findings. Science 2009;324:1557-61. |
|8.||Fisher B, Gibbs RS. H1N1 Influenza and Pregnancy. Postgrad Obstet Gynecol 2010;30:1-5. |
|9.||Neuzil KM, Reed GW, Mitchel EF, Simonsen L, Griffin MR. Impact of influenza on acute cardiopulmonary hospitalization in pregnant women. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:1094-102. |
|10.||Mullooly JP, Barker WH, Nolan TF Jr. Risk of acute respiratory disease among pregnant women during influenza A epidemics. Public Health Rep 1986;101:205-11. |
|11.||Dodds L, McNeil SA, Fell DB, Allen VM, Coombs A, Scott J, et al. Impact of influenza exposure on rates of hospital admissions and physician visits because of respiratory illness among pregnant women. CMAJ 2007;176:463-8. |
|12.||Lim WS, Macfarlane JT, Colthorpe CL. Treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections during pregnancy. Am J Respir Med 2003;2:221-33. |
|13.||Goodnight WH, Soper DE. Pneumonia in pregnancy. Crit Care Med 2005;33 Suppl 10:S390-7. |
|14.||Anker M. Pregnancy and Emerging disease. Emerg Infect Dis 2007;13:518-9. |
|15.||Hewagama S, Walker SP, Stuart RL, Gordon C, Johnson PD, Friedman ND, et al. 2009 H1N1 influenza A and pregnancy outcomes in Victoria Australia. Clin Infect Dis 2010;50:686-90. |
|16.||Kolarzyk E, Szot WM, Lyszczarz J. Lung function and breathing regulation parameters during pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005;272:53-8. |
|17.||Updated Interim Recommendations for the Use of Antiviral Medications in the Treatment and Prevention of Influenza for the 2009-2010 Season. Centre for disease control and Prevention. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/H1N1flu/recommendations.htm. [Last accessed on 2010 Jan 24]. |
|18.||Tullu MS. Oseltamivir. J Postgrad Med 2009;55:225-30. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||Influenza virus infection in pregnancy: a review
| ||Wouter J. Meijer,Aleid G.A. van Noortwijk,Hein W. Bruinse,Annemarie M.J. Wensing |
| ||Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2015; 94(8): 797 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Maternal vaccination: moving the science forward
| ||A. N. Faucette,B. L. Unger,B. Gonik,K. Chen |
| ||Human Reproduction Update. 2015; 21(1): 119 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|