Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 623  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::  Article in PDF (868 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  References
 ::  Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed20237    
    Printed86    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded16    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal


 


 
  Table of Contents     
CASE SNIPPET
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 153-154

Beware of "hook effect" giving false negative pregnancy test on point-of-care kits


1 Department of Pathology, Integral Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Safdarjung Hospital and Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication21-Jun-2013

Correspondence Address:
Y K Yadav
Department of Pathology, Integral Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.113838

Rights and Permissions




How to cite this article:
Yadav Y K, Fatima U, Dogra S, Kaushik A. Beware of "hook effect" giving false negative pregnancy test on point-of-care kits. J Postgrad Med 2013;59:153-4

How to cite this URL:
Yadav Y K, Fatima U, Dogra S, Kaushik A. Beware of "hook effect" giving false negative pregnancy test on point-of-care kits. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Jun 27];59:153-4. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2013/59/2/153/113838


Urine pregnancy test kits, a one step point-of-care (POC) are widely used both at home and in laboratories. We report in this paper, a case of false-negative qualitative human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) assay which was caused by the "high-dose hook effect" leading to delay in diagnosis and subsequent management.

A 30-year-old gravida 3 para 2, female with 16 weeks amenorrhea, presented to the emergency department with vaginal spotting, lower abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. On examination, her heart rate and blood pressure were elevated. The abdomen was diffusely tender. Pelvic examination revealed a closed cervical os and an 18-week sized uterus with adenexal tenderness. The complete blood count and biochemical profile were within normal limits. Results of urine tests for the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) (tested with one step pregnancy test device by Abon Biopharm Company, China, sensitivity of 25 milli-international units per milliliter (mIU/ml) for β-hCG) was negative. An ultrasonography revealed an enlarged uterus with a heterogeneous mass with multiple cystic areas measuring 10.6 cm × 6.2 cm × 6.4 cm in the corpus. A differential diagnosis of vesicular mole and fibroid with degeneration was suggested. Subsequently, on clinical suspicion the test for β-hCG was performed after a 1:10 dilution and it showed weak positivity. On increasing the dilution up to 1:100, the test was strongly positive [Figure 1]a. Quantitative assay after multiple dilutions and repeated testing of the serum showed a β-hCG level of 1,430,000 mIU/ml (normal <5-200,000 mIU/ml). Thus a final diagnosis of molar pregnancy was made. The patient immediately underwent dilation and curettage. Histopathological examination confirmed a complete hydatidiform mole [Figure 1]b.

Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTT) demonstrates marked geographic and ethnic differences, with the highest incidence in Southeast Asia. The rates are 12 per 1,000 pregnancies in India, Indonesia, and Turkey. [1] There have been reports of false-negative urine, serum, and both urine and serum β-hCG pregnancy tests in hydatidiform mole. [2],[3] The different screening methods including different kits for home pregnancy tests based on chromatographic sandwich immunoassays in which two antibodies directed to different portions (the α and β subunits) of the hCG molecule "sandwich", a single antigen to produce a color change.
Figure 1: (a) Kit 1 showing negative result due to "hook effect". Kit 2 showing weak positivity after 1:10 dilution and on increasing the dilution up to 1:100, the kit 3 was strongly positive; (b) Histologic section of a complete hydatidiform mole stained with hematoxylin and eosin (×400). Villi of different sizes are present. The villous in the center exhibiting fluid filled cistern bordered by diffuse trophoblastic proliferation

Click here to view


Falsely low or false-negative results can occur when an extremely high level of substrate overwhelms the assay system. If the concentration of the antigen is sufficiently high to saturate, both the solid migratory phase and fixed detection antibodies independently, it prevents the same molecule from binding the two antibodies and forming a "sandwich". This is so called "high-dose hook effect," which prevents the formation of color change and leads to a false-negative test. [4] The signal increases progressively until the hormone concentration exceeds the binding capacity. Subsequently, instead of a proportional response to the increase in hCG concentration, the output signal decreases creating a fish hook effect [Figure 2] which happened in our patient.

The hook effect can be overcome by dilution as described. [4] Apart from β-hCG, other immunoassays in which high dose hook effect has been documented include prolactin, immunoglobulin E (IgE), ferritin, thyrotropin, prostate-specific antigen, albumin, and tumor markers (e.g., cancer antigen (CA-125), α-fetoprotein (AFP)). [5] In India as the incidence of gestational trophoblastic disease among the highest in world. Thus, physicians should always be aware of false-negative urinary and serum β-hCG due to the "high dose hook effect", as this will delay diagnosis and can precipitate complications.
Figure 2: Graph showing fish hook effect

Click here to view


 
 :: References Top

1.Moodley M. Gestational trophoblastic disease. In: Kruger TF, Botha MH, editors. Clinical Gynecology. 3 rd ed. Cape Town: Mercury Crescent; 2007. p. 235-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Davison CM, Kaplan RM, Wenig LN, Burmeister D. Qualitative beta-hCG urine assays may be misleading in the presence of molar pregnancy: A case report. J Emerg Med 2004;27:43-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Er TK, Jong YJ, Tsai EM, Huang CL, Chou HW, Zheng BH, et al. False-negative pregnancy test in hydatidiform mole. Clin Chem 2006;52:1616-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Wheeler CA, Davis S, Degefu S, Thorneycroft IH, O'Quinn AG. Ovarian choriocarcinoma: A difficult diagnosis of an unusual tumor and a review of the hook effect. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:547-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Wolf BA, Garrett NC, Nahm MH. The "hook effect": High concentrations of prostate-specific antigen giving artifactually low values on one-step immunoassay. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1755-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

This article has been cited by
1 A 14-Year-Old Female With Abdominal Pain and Vaginal Bleeding
Jonathan Auten
Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine. 2015; 16(2): 131
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Negative Pregnancy Test in Patients with Trophoblastic Diseases
Chun-Wing Yeung,Annie N. Y. Cheung
Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow