Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 3250  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::Related articles
 ::  Article in PDF (411 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  Abstract
 :: Introduction
 ::  Materials and Me...
 :: Results
 :: Discussion
 ::  References
 ::  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4290    
    Printed94    
    Emailed5    
    PDF Downloaded24    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


 


 
  Table of Contents     
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 173-176

Current status of multidrug resistant tuberculosis in a tertiary care hospital of East Delhi


Department of Microbiology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India

Date of Submission15-Mar-2013
Date of Decision29-Apr-2013
Date of Acceptance29-May-2013
Date of Web Publication12-Sep-2013

Correspondence Address:
B Kashyap
Department of Microbiology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.118031

Rights and Permissions


 :: Abstract 

Background and Objective: Multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is caused by infection due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis which is resistant to both isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF). It is caused by selection of resistant mutant strains due to inadequate treatment and poor compliance. MDR-TB is a major public health problem as the treatment is complicated, cure rates are well below those for drug susceptible tuberculosis and patient remains infectious for months despite receiving the best available therapy. The drug susceptibility pattern of M. tuberculosis is essential for proper control of MDR-TB in every health care setting, hence the study was initiated with the aim of studying the prevalence of MDR-TB in patients attending a tertiary care hospital in east Delhi. Materials and Methods: Five hundred and forty-three pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples from suspected cases of tuberculosis received in the mycobacteriology laboratory from November 2009 through October 2010 were investigated for M. tuberculosis. All the samples were subjected to direct microscopic examination for demonstration of acid fast bacilli followed by culture on Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium to isolate M. tuberculosis. Identification was done by conventional biochemical methods. Drug susceptibility of isolated M. tuberculosis strains was done by conventional 1% proportion method followed by sequencing of RIF resistant isolates to detect mutations to confirm resistance. Results and Conclusions: M. tuberculosis was isolated from 75 out of 543 suspected cases of pulmonary/extrapulmonary TB. Three of the total 75 M. tuberculosis isolates (4%) showed resistance to any one of the first line drugs. Prevalence of MDR-TB was 1.3%. The sequencing of single MDR strain showed mutations at codons 516, 517, and 518. Amplification of rpoB and sequential analysis of the amplicon is a better way of detection of mutation and the evidence of new mutation in this study indicate that mutations continue to arise, probably due to the ability of M. tuberculosis to adapt to drug exposure.


Keywords: Antituberculosis drugs resistance, drug resistance, multidrug resistant tuberculosis, mutation, rpoB gene, tuberculosis


How to cite this article:
Sagar T, Singh N P, Kashyap B, Kaur I R. Current status of multidrug resistant tuberculosis in a tertiary care hospital of East Delhi. J Postgrad Med 2013;59:173-6

How to cite this URL:
Sagar T, Singh N P, Kashyap B, Kaur I R. Current status of multidrug resistant tuberculosis in a tertiary care hospital of East Delhi. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Oct 15];59:173-6. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2013/59/3/173/118031



 :: Introduction Top


Tuberculosis continues to be a major health problem worldwide despite the fact that the causative agent was discovered more than 100 years ago. Though the disease primarily effects lungs and causes pulmonary tuberculosis, it can also affect intestine, meninges, bones and joints, lymph glands, skin, and other tissues of the body. The disease is more prevalent in developing countries with poor economy, limited infrastructure, overcrowding, and undernourishment. In India, the disease is estimated to kill 500,000 individuals per year; about 1,000 everyday; and one per minute. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) has been a topic of growing interest in the last decade. The exact magnitude of the problem of resistance to antituberculosis drugs worldwide was not known till 1994-1997 when the global project on antituberculosis drugs resistance surveillance was initiated by World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (IUAT-LD). MDR TB is defined as the disease due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis that is resistant to both isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF) with or without resistance to other drugs. Prevalence of MDR-TB mirrors the functional state and efficacy of tuberculosis control programs and realistic attitude of the community towards implementation of such programs. [1] Treating MDR-TB can be difficult because of inability to use the two most potent antituberculosis drugs (i.e., INH and RIF) that implies less effective first line therapy and more toxic and less efficacious second line therapy. In all countries and especially those where the number of cases of tuberculosis is rising rapidly because of association with HIV, the development and spread of resistant strains of tuberculosis is a serious concern. In the present study, we determined the prevalence of MDR-TB in a tertiary care hospital of east Delhi along with the mutations in rpoB gene of an isolated MDR strain.


 :: Materials and Methods Top


A prospective study was carried out from November 2009 through October 2010 in the Department of Microbiology at University College of Medical Sciences (UCMS) and Guru Teg Bahadur (GTB) Hospital. Five hundred and forty-three samples from clinically suspected pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients received in the mycobacteriology laboratory were investigated for M. tuberculosis. A total of 75 M. tuberculosis isolates from 543 samples of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis cases were further analyzed for drug resistance by conventional 1% proportion method.

Microscopy

Smears were prepared from all the 543 samples and stained by Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining for demonstration of acid fast bacilli after which they were examined under light microscope and graded according to Revised National Tuberculosis Program (RNTCP) protocol. [2]

Isolation and identification of M. tuberculosis

All the 543 specimens were processed and cultured on Lowenstein Jensen (LJ) medium as per the standard protocol. The sediments were inoculated onto LJ medium slopes and incubated for 8 weeks. The growth of M. tuberculosis was identified by colony morphology, Ziehl-Neelsen staining, and the conventional biochemical tests as per the standard protocol followed in our laboratory. [3] The niacin test was carried out using commercially prepared BBL Taxo TB niacin test strips (from BD Diagnostic) according to manufactures' protocol.

Drug susceptibility testing for M. tuberculosis

The DST was carried out on the M. isolates by conventional 1% proportion method against INH (0.2 μg/ml), ethambutol (2 μg/ml), streptomycin (4 μg/ml), and RIF (40 μg/ml). [4] H37Rv was used as the reference strain.

DNA extraction

The mycobacterial DNA was extracted from the MDR isolate (Bioneer, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The extracted DNA was stored at −70°C till further processing.

Polymerase chain reaction of MDR strain targeting rpoB gene

The 255 base pair (bp) region of rpoB gene was amplified using the following primers.

Backward primer: 5'ATGACCACCCAGGACGTG3'.
Forward primer: 5'GGTTTCGATCGGGCACAT3'.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [5] was carried out in 50 mL of a reaction mixture containing 5 μl of × 10 Taq buffer (Fermentas), 200 mM of deoxynucleoside triphosphates (Fermentas), 1 U of Taq polymerase (Fermentas),10 pmoles of each set of primers (Genetix), and 10 ng of chromosomal DNA followed by addition of nuclease free water to make up to final volume (50 μl). The thermal cycle conditions were: 95°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 95°C × 1 min, 50°C × 1 min, 72°C × 1 min, and final extension at 72°C × 10 min. The PCR products were analyzed on 1% agarose gel and the amplicon size was compared with appropriate DNA ladder (HiMedia; Thermal cycler Master cycle personel Eppendorf AG 22331 Hamburg, Germany).

Sequencing of amplicon

The amplicon of the MDR strain was outsourced for sequencing (Invitrogen, Gurgaon). The sequence of the rpoB amplicon of the test RIF resistance strain of M. tuberculosis was matched with the known sequence of rpoB gene of the sensitive H37RV strain for mutations.


 :: Results Top


Among the total of 543 clinically suspected cases of pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB that were recruited during the study period, only 75 were diagnosed to be positive and M. tuberculosis was isolated from them. Out of the total of 75 isolates of M. tuberculosis, 36 and 39 samples were from pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis cases, respectively. Three of the 75 (4%) M. tuberculosis isolates showed resistance to one or two drugs and the interpretation could be done by 28 days in one (33%) and by 42 days in two (67%) isolates [Table 1]. Two of these isolates (one MDR and the INH monoresistant strain) were from cases of pulmonary tuberculosis and one isolate (resistant to INH and streptomycin) was from a case of infertility. All the three isolates showed resistance to INH out of which only one isolate was monoresistant. Among the remaining two isolates, one was resistant to RIF (MDR) (1.3%) and the other was resistant to streptomycin (1.3%) in addition to INH [Table 1]. Rest of the 72/75 (96%) isolates were sensitive to all the drugs.
Table 1: Resistance pattern of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates by 1% proportion method (n=75)

Click here to view


Deletion of codons 516, 517, and 518 was detected in RIF resistance determining region (RRDR) of rpoB gene in the single MDR strain sequenced.


 :: Discussion Top


Tuberculosis is one of the oldest diseases known to affect humans. It is a major cause of death worldwide. If properly treated tuberculosis caused by drug susceptible strain is curable virtually in all cases. In recent years the treatment of tuberculosis has been threatened by the increasing number of patients with MDR tuberculosis. Both INH and RIF are potent bactericidal antituberculosis drugs used in tuberculosis control programs. The outcome of treatment of patients harboring MDR M. tuberculosis strains has been poor with high mortality rate. Their chance of being cured is very low and they require significant expenditure of healthcare resources. Moreover, these patients remain infectious for a prolonged period and may therefore be more likely to infect others. The level of drug resistance is said to provide an epidemiological indicator to assess the amount of resistant bacterial transmission in the community as well as the success of tuberculosis control programs. Further, this influences the therapeutic regimens and policy decision also.

The prevalence of MDR-TB in our study was 1.3% which is reasonably in agreement with various other studies shown in [Table 2]. [6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13] The variation in studies could be due to different selection criteria of patients, extent of misuse of drugs, quality of questionnaire used for eliciting history of previous treatment, and inadequate laboratory support and reporting system. In the single MDR case that was found, there was no history of intake of antituberculosis treatment in the past, neither was their family history of TB. According to the directly observed treatment shortcourse (DOTS) records, the patient belongs to low socioeconomic status but was compliant with the therapy. MDR-TB largely occurs as a result of pressure selection during disease treatment. Drug resistance in M. tuberculosis is caused by mutation in relatively restricted region of the genome. Mutation associated with drug resistance occur in rpoB gene for RIF, katG gene for INH, gene embB for ethambutol, pncA gene for pyrazinamide, and rpsl and rrs genes for streptomycin. RIF is one of the most important chemotherapeutic agents used to combat infections by M. tuberculosis and can be assumed to be a surrogate marker for MDR-TB. [14] Moreover, more than 90% of RIF-resistant isolates are also resistant to INH; therefore, detection of RIF resistance could also identify MDR strains. [15] The above observations have led to the recent development of several genotypic methods for rapidly detecting RIF-resistance conferring mutations, including DNA sequencing, line probe assay, single strand conformation polymorphism, DNA microarrays, RNA/RNA mismatch, and molecular beacons.
Table 2: Worldwide prevalence of multidrug resistant tuberculosis

Click here to view


The development of resistance to RIF is due to mutation in a well-defined 81 bp (27 codon) central region of the gene that includes the β-subunit of RNA polymerase (rpoB). More than 96% of the RIF-resistant strains contain a mutation in this 81 bp region of rpoB gene which is referred to as the rifampicin resistance determining region (RRDR), thus facilitating a straight forward approach to detecting RIF resistance and/or MDR, rapidly. [16] Different groups of workers from diverse regions of the world [17],[18],[19] have reported substitutions, deletions, and insertions in the RRDR of the rpoB gene. The highest frequencies of mutation are seen in codon 531 (83%), followed by codon 526 (7%), codon 516 (5%), codon 533 (4%), and codon 513 (2%). [20] Various workers worldwide have shown different frequencies of mutation at codon 531 (29-74%), 526 (0-43%), and 516 (0-38%). [20],[21] In our study, MDR-TB strain was amplified for 255 bp region of rpoB gene and the amplicon was sequenced to know the mutation. Deletion mutation was found in codon 516, 517, and 518. The deletion mutation of codons 516, 517, and 518 together has been rarely reported. The deletion of both codon 517 and 518 or codon 516 and 517 or single deletion of codon 517 or 518 has been reported. [22] Only one case has been reported from south India where deletion of codon 517 was detected. [16] In our study there was deletion of codon 516, 517, and 518 and such a mutation has not been reported earlier from this part of the country to the best of our knowledge.

Despite the large number of mutations already reported in other studies, the evidence of new mutation in this study indicates that mutations continue to arise, probably due to the ability of M. tuberculosis to adapt to drug exposure. Newer techniques based on the principle of hybridization probes rapidly identify clinical isolates as members of the M. tuberculosis along with determining the presence of point mutation within the RRDR of the rpoB gene. Such tests are designed according to the expected mutations in an area. Amplification of rpoB gene followed by sequential analysis of the amplicon is a better way of detection of mutation.

 
 :: References Top

1.World Health Organization. Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in the world. Report No. 4. 2008 WHO/HTM/TB/2008.394.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Smear Microscopy for Detection of Acid-fast Bacilli. Manual for laboratory technicians. Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP). New Delhi, 2009.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Fuselier PA, Garcia LS, Roberts GD, Thomson RB, York MK. Mycobacteria. In: Forbes BA, Sahm DM, Weissfeld AS, editors. Bailey and Scott's Diagnostic Microbiology. 12 th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. p. 478-509.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Training manual for Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture and drug susceptibility testing. Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme. (RNTCP). New Delhi; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Kapur V, Li LL, Iordanescu S, Hamrick MR, Wanger A, Kreiswirth BN, et al. Characterization by Automated DNA Sequencing of Mutations in the Gene (rpoB) Encoding the RNA Polymerase 3 Subunit in Rifampin-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains from New York City and Texas. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1095-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Parmasivan CN, Bhaskaran K, Venkataraman, Chandrasekhran V, Narayanan PR. Surveillance of drug resistance in tuberculosis in the state of Tamil Nadu. Indian J Tuberc 2000;47:27-33.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Prasad R. MDR TB: Current status. Indian J Tub 2005;52:121-31.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Sophia V, Balasangameshwara VH, Jagannatha PS, Kumar P. Initial drug resistant among tuberculosis patients under DOTS programme in Bangalore city. Indian J Tuberc 2004;52:17-21.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Mahadeo B, Kumar P, Agrawal SP, Chauhan LS, Sriknataramu N. Surveillance of drug resistant to anti-tuberculosis drugs in districts of Hoogli in West Bengal and Myurbhanj in Orissa. Indian J Tuberc 2005;52:5-10.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.WHO/IUATLD. Global Project on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance. Surveillance: Anti-Tuberculosis drug resistance in the world, Report No. 4, Annex 9 WHO/HTM/TB/2008.394 Geneva; 2008.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Jain A, Mondal R, Prasad R, Singh K, Ahuja RC. Prevalence of multidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Med Res 2008;128:300-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
12.WHO Global tuberculosis control: Surveillance, planning, financing: WHO report 2008. WHO/HTM/TB/2008.393.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.WHO Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant TB (M/XDR-TB): 2010 global report on surveillance and response. Geneva: World Health Organization 2010 Contract No.: WHO/HTM/TB/2010.3. 2010.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Hirano K, Abe C, Takahashi M. Mutations in the rpoB gene of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated mostly in Asian countries and their rapid detection by line probe assay. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:2663-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Morgan M, Kalantri S, Flores L, Pai M. A commercial line probe assay for the rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2005;5:62.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.Mani C, Selvakumar N, Narayanan S, Narayanan PR. Mutations in the rpoB Gene of Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical Isolates from India. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:2987-90.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Matsiota-Bernard P, Vrioni G, Marinis E. Characterization of rpoB mutations in rifampin-resistant clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Greece. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:20-3.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.Miller LP, Crawford JT, Shinnick TM. The rpoB gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994;38:805-11.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.Pozzi G, Meloni M, Iona E, Orru G, Thoresen OF, Ricci ML, et al. rpoB mutations in multidrug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated in Italy. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:1197-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Van Rie A, Warren R, Mshanga I, Jordaan AM, van der Spuy GD, Richardson M, et al. Analysis for limited number of gene codon can predict drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a high-incidence community. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:636-41.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.Bártfai Z, Somoskövi A, Ködmön C, Szabó N, Puskás E, Kosztolányi L, et al. Molecular characterization of rifampin resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Hungary by DNA sequencing and the line probe assay. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:3736-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Musser JM. Antimicrobial agent resistance in mycobacteria: Molecular genetic insights. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995;8:496-514.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Issues in the management of drug resistant tuberculosis in India
Behera, D.
Lung India. 2013; 30(4): 269-272
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow