Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 6942  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::Related articles
 ::  Article in PDF (352 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  Abstract
 :: Introduction
 ::  Materials and Me...
 :: Results
 :: Discussion
 ::  References
 ::  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed7673    
    Printed115    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded25    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


 


 
  Table of Contents     
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 263-270

Risk factors for delirium and inpatient mortality with delirium


Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Date of Web Publication17-Dec-2013

Correspondence Address:
S Grover
Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.123147

Rights and Permissions


 :: Abstract 

Background: There is limited on the risk factors and mortality in patients with delirium from India. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors associated with delirium and inpatient mortality rates of patients diagnosed with delirium by psychiatry consultation liaison services. Materials and Methods: Three hundred and thirty-one patients diagnosed as delirium by the psychiatry consultation liaison services were examined on standardized instruments: Delirium Rating Scale Revised 98 version (DRS-R-98), amended Delirium Motor Symptom Scale (DMSS), Delirium Etiology Checklist (DEC), Charlson Comorbidity index, and a checklist for assessment of risk factors. Results: More than three medications as a risk factor and metabolic/endocrine disturbances as cause were observed to play largest role in development of delirium. The inpatient mortality rate was 12.4%. Compared to the survivor group, those who died were more likely to be young (<65 years), had significantly high rate of alcohol dependence and were more frequently restrained prior to development of delirium; of these only age <65 years and use of restraints emerged as the significant predictors of mortality in regression analysis. Conclusion: Age and use of restraints appears to be an important predictor mortality in patients with delirium.


Keywords: Delirium, mortality, predictors


How to cite this article:
Grover S, Ghormode D, Ghosh A, Avasthi A, Chakrabarti S, Mattoo S K, Malhotra S. Risk factors for delirium and inpatient mortality with delirium. J Postgrad Med 2013;59:263-70

How to cite this URL:
Grover S, Ghormode D, Ghosh A, Avasthi A, Chakrabarti S, Mattoo S K, Malhotra S. Risk factors for delirium and inpatient mortality with delirium. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Nov 13];59:263-70. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2013/59/4/263/123147



 :: Introduction Top


Delirium is the most common psychiatric diagnosis in patient referred from various medical surgical wards to psychiatry consultation-liaison team. [1] It is associated with a wide range of risk factors and etiologies. [2] In general delirium is considered to be a reversible condition, but it is also reported to be associated with high mortality. Mortality rates have ranged from 9 to 34.5% during their inpatient stay. [3],[4],[5],[6],[7] It is important to note that the studies which have focused on the inpatient and follow-up mortality rates have been limited to elderly population or to those admitted to the intensive care units. [5],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13] Occasional studies have evaluated the mortality rates of medical-surgical inpatients with delirium referred for psychiatric consultation. Tennen, et al., [6] evaluated 1 year mortality rate of 454 patients admitted to various medical surgical inpatients referred for psychiatric consultation and reported a mortality rate of 15.2% within 1 year of referral for psychiatric consultation. Among the various psychiatric diagnosis, delirium was the only psychiatric diagnosis associated with higher mortality at 1 year (52.2 vs 29.9%, P=0.01; hazard ratio=1.7). In a recent study from our center, which included 97 patients with delirium, the inpatient mortality rate was 28% at 6 months post discharge. When an attempt was made to study the relationship of various sociodemographic and clinical variables and mortality in patients of delirium, none of the variables emerged as a significant predictor, possibly because of small sample size. [7] Although some recent studies from India have studied the phenomenology/symptom profile of patients with delirium seen in consultation-liaison psychiatry, [14],[15],[16] very few studies have evaluated the prevalence of risk factors for development of delirium.

In this background, the current study aimed to evaluate the risk factors and inpatient mortality rates of patients diagnosed with delirium by psychiatry consultation liaison services. An attempt was also made to study the predictors of mortality in patients with delirium.


 :: Materials and Methods Top


Ethics

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and written informed consent was obtained from caregivers.

Setting

The study was carried out a multispecialty teaching hospital in north India. It was prospective, assessing patients who were admitted to various medicosurgical and emergency wards and diagnosed to have delirium by the Consultation Liaison (CL) team were evaluated to confirm the diagnosis of delirium as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. [17]

The study involved assessment of referral pattern, phenomenology, motoric subtypes, risk factors, associated etiologies for delirium, outcome of delirium, experience of delirium of patients and the etiological models about symptoms of delirium held by the caregivers. In this paper only the data of risk factors and mortality is presented.

Assessment tools delirium rating scale-revised-98

It assesses the symptom frequency by considering as 'present' if any item rated as 1 or more. Of the 16 items, 13 comprise the severity scale and three are diagnostic items. The severity scale scores range from 0 to 39, higher scores indicate more severe delirium, and a cutoff score ≥15 is consistent with a diagnosis of delirium. It has good interrater reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity for distinguishing delirium in mixed neuropsychiatric populations including dementia, depression, and schizophrenia. [18],[19]

Amended delirium motor symptom scale

The DMSS classifies delirium into various motoric subtypes. Original DMSS consists of 11 items: Increased quantity of motor activity, loss of control of activity, restlessness, wandering (these items pertain to hyperactive subtype), decreased amount of activity, decreased speed of actions, reduced awareness of surroundings, decreased amount of speech, decreased speed of speech, listlessness, reduced alertness/withdrawal (these items pertain to hypoactive subtype). [20],[21] A later analysis, based on which amended DMSS was developed suggested that DMSS consists of 13 items (five hyperactive and eight hypoactive items), with one item extra for each of the subtyping. The extra hyperactive item was 'increased speed of actions' and extra hypoactive item was 'decreased volume speech'. [22] Rating is done on the basis of definite evidence for behavior in the previous 24 h, which is a deviation from predelirious baseline. At least two out of five hyperactive items must be present, or at least two out of eight hypoactive items for the hyperactive and hypoactive subtypes to be diagnosed, respectively. The subtype is considered to be 'mixed' when there is concurrent evidence for both these subtypes and 'no motor subtype' when evidence for neither subtype is present. [20],[22]

Risk factors for delirium

A list for assessment of risk factors for delirium was developed for the present study and was based on a review of literature and covered common risk factors associated with delirium.

Delirium etiology checklist

It was used to standardize attribution of etiology on the basis of all available clinical information into 12 categories of etiological causation, each rated on a 5-point scale for degree of attribution to the delirium episode, ranging from "ruled out/not present/not relevant" (0) to "definite cause" (4) as follows: Drug intoxication/drug withdrawal; metabolic/endocrine disturbance; traumatic brain injury; seizures; infection (intracranial); infection (systemic); neoplasm (intracranial); neoplasm (systemic); cerebrovascular; organ insufficiency; other CNS; and other systemic causes. This system allows for the documentation of the presence and suspected role for multiple potential causes of delirium and provides more information specifically relevant to delirium than a listing of current medical conditions. [21]

Charlson comorbidity index

The Charlson Comorbidity index predicts the 10 year mortality for a patient who may have a range of comorbid conditions such as heart disease, acquired immunodeficiency disease or cancer (a total of 22 conditions). Each condition is assigned a score of 1, 2, 3, or 6 depending on the risk of dying associated with this condition. Then the scores are summed up and given a total score which predicts mortality. The clinical conditions and scores are as follow: 1 each for myocardial infarct, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, cerebrovascular disease, chronic lung disease, connective tissue disease, ulcer, and chronic liver disease; score of 2 each for hemiplegia, moderate or severe kidney disease, diabetes, diabetes with complication, tumor, leukemia, and lymphoma; 3 each for moderate or severe liver disease, and 6 each for malignant tumor, metastasis, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). [23]

Procedure

From 1 st January 2012 to 15 th July 2012, caregivers of all the patients diagnosed with delirium by the CL team were approached for participation in the study and explained about the nature of the study. The consenting carers were interviewed to confirm the patients' diagnosis of delirium as per DSM-IV TR criteria. Then the required information was obtained from family members, treating team, patients, and treatment records to complete the clinical profile, DRS-R-98, amended DMSS, DEC, risk factors, and Charlson Comorbidity index. Lastly, to study the clinical outcome the patients were followed-up regularly till they expired or were discharged from the hospital.

Data analysis

The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 14 (SPSS 14). Descriptive analysis was carried out in the form of frequency, percentages, means, and standard deviations. Comparisons were done by using Chi-square, Fisher exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Binary logistic regression analysis was done to study the predictors of mortality. All analyses were done at 5% significance.


 :: Results Top


A total of 331 consecutive patients of delirium were studies. Of these, 41/331 died during the inpatient stay, giving an inpatient mortality rate of 12.4%. In most other patients delirium improved (N=266; 80.36%) by the time of discharge and in few patients (N=24; 16.3%) symptoms of delirium persisted.

Sociodemographic variables

The sociodemographic profile of the whole sample, those who discharged from the hospital (after recovery/improvement with respect to delirium or worsening of delirium) and those died during the hospital stay is shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: Demographic and clinical variables


Click here to view


The mean age of the study sample was 46.2 years and 264 (79.7%) patients were aged less than 65 years of age. About two-third of the patients were males and the mean duration of education was 9.2 years at the time of assessment. Except for the fact that those who died had significantly higher proportion of non-elderly patients, there were no significant differences on any of the other sociodemographic variables [Table 1].

Clinical variables

The mean duration of delirium at the time of first assessment was 2.27±2.2 days. Most of the patients (77.6%) had hospital emergent delirium, were not treated with any antipsychotic medications or benzodiazepine (89.1%) and the mean number of medications received for all ailments at the time of baseline assessment were 0.9±1.4. There was no significant difference between those died during the hospital stay and those who survived during the hospital stay on any of these variables. Majority of the patients were admitted under the medical services of the hospital. Although mortality was higher in those admitted in the surgical setups, but the difference between the two groups was not significant.

DRS-R-98 profile

On DRS-R-98 diagnostic items, all the patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of 'presence of an underlying physical disorder' and majority of them fulfilled the 'temporal onset of symptoms (92.7%)' and 'fluctuation of symptoms (97%)' criteria. In the whole sample, >80% of the patients had disturbances in sleep-wake cycle, lability of affect, motor agitation, attention, orientation, and short-term memory impairments. The least common symptoms were motor retardation, delusions, and disturbance in long-term memory [Table 2]. The two groups did not differ with respect to frequency of symptoms as assessed on DRS-R-98.
Table 2: Delirium rating scale revised 98 version profile and motoric subtypes of delirium


Click here to view


As shown in [Table 2], the two groups were similar for the severity of DRS-R-98 item scores. There was no significant difference with respect to the total DRS-R-98 score, DRS-R-98 severity score, DRS-R-98 noncognitive domain score, and DRS-R-98 cognitive domain score.

Motoric subtypes of delirium as per amended DMSS

As shown in [Table 2], more than half (58.9%) of the patients had hyperactive delirium. This was followed by mixed subtype and hypoactive subtype. As there were very few patients in the nonhyperactive group, all the three nonhyperactive groups were combined together for comparison. On comparison no significant difference was found between those who expired and those who survived (Chi-square test=1.71; P=0.18).

Risk factors for delirium

Factors which were present prior to onset of delirium were considered to be risk factors predisposing a person to develop delirium. Based on the review of literature a specific risk factor list was prepared. As is evident from [Table 3], the most common risk factors which were present in our sample were use of more than three medications (58.3%). It was followed by increased urea level (31.7%), anemia (28.7%), increased creatinine level (24.4%), immobility prior to delirium (27.8%), hyponatremia (23.2%), smoking (23%), acute infection (21.1%), and admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) (20.2%), etc. When the risk factors were compared between those who expired and those who survived, significant difference was found on the variables of patients with age >65 years (more frequent in the survivor group), history of alcohol dependence (more frequent in those who expired), and use of restraints (more frequent in those who expired).
Table 3: Risk factors for delirium


Click here to view


Etiologies associated with delirium

According to DEC each etiology is rated on a 5-point scale for degree of attribution to the delirium episode, ranging from "ruled out/not present/not relevant" (0) to "definite cause" (4). For analysis the ratings of definite cause, likely cause, and cause present and possibly contributory were combined and considered as present and the rating of "present but not contributory" and "ruled out/not present/not relevant" were considered as absent. As is evident from [Table 4], metabolic and endocrine disturbances were most common abnormalities (77%) followed by organ insufficiency (24.8%), systemic infection (20.5%), and drug withdrawal (12%).
Table 4: Rating on delirium etiology checklist


Click here to view


Charlson's comorbidity index

Charlson's comorbidity index predicts the 10-year mortality for a patient with a range of medical illnesses (a total of 22 conditions). The weighted index of comorbidity in the study sample was 1.4 and the combined condition and age adjusted score was 2.4 and the estimated 10 year survival of the study sample was 73%. As shown in [Table 5], there was no significant difference between those who expired and those who survived with respect to any of these parameters.
Table 5: Charlson's mortality index


Click here to view


Predictors of mortality

To assess the predictors of mortality, binary logistic regression analysis was done. For the same outcome variable, that is, expired or survived by the time of discharge was used as the dependent variable and all other variables, for which the significance value (P-value) was less than 0.1 were used as independent variables. As is evident from [Table 6], the significant predictors of mortality with odds ratio of more than 1 was age less than 65 years of age and use of restraints.
Table 6: Predictors of mortality in delirium using binary logistic regression


Click here to view



 :: Discussion Top


The present study was an attempt to evaluate the risk factors associated with delirium and the factors associated with mortality in patients admitted to general hospital inpatient unit. Patients were assessed on standardized instruments to assess the phenomenology, motoric subtypes, associated etiologies, and the risk factors for developing delirium. Although previous studies from India have evaluated the phenomenology, the data is limited with respect to the prevalence of various risk factors, associated etiologies, and predictors of mortality from India. This is possibly the largest sample size study from India of patients with delirium. Although sample size calculation was not done, the sample size can be considered to be reasonable enough to draw firm conclusions.

The demography of our sample was similar to the previous studies from our center. [1],[14],[15],[16] Because the symptoms of delirium tend to be most florid immediately after presentation, assessments were carried out as early as possible. Resultantly, the mean duration of delirium at assessment of 3.27 days as seen in the previous studies from our center. [14],[15],[24] Delirium developing after hospitalization in 78.4% of our patients was higher than in the previous studies from different centers/countries, [25],[26],[27] but similar to studies from our center. [14],[26]

The phenomenology of delirium as noted in the present study is very similar to that reported in previous studies. [14],[15],[22] Predominance of patients with hyperactivity suggests that patients with behavioral disturbance, especially, those with agitation are most often referred, as noted in previous studies from our center [15],[16],[22] and other parts of world, which suggests that hyperactivity is a common clinical presentation in CL referral versus elderly medical, palliative care, and ICU populations. [28]

The most common etiologies associated with delirium in the present study were metabolic/endocrine disturbances, organ insufficiency, and systemic infection is in keeping with the existing literature. [1],[24]

Most of the previous studies from India have not evaluated the risk factors for delirium. One study [25] evaluated the risk factors for delirium in elderly and reported preexisting cognitive deficits, neurological illnesses, urinary tract infections, visual impairment, hearing impairment, current proteinuria, leukocytosis, raised blood ammonia, hyponatremia, and disturbances in the potassium levels to be associated with development of delirium. In contrast, in the present study we found that more than half of the patients with delirium were receiving more than three medications, and another one-fifth to one-third of the patients were having higher urea/creatinine level, had anemia, were immobile prior to onset of delirium, were smoker, were admitted to intensive care unit, had history of alcohol dependence, use of restraints, hyponatremia, acute infection or receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), etc., When we compare the findings of the present study with most of the existing literature from developed countries, the risk factors appear to be similar. [29]

In the present study, the inpatient mortality was 12.4%, which was similar to that in the previous studies from the West (9-34.5%) [3],[5],[6] and from India. [25] However, it is important to note that most of the mortality seen in the present study can be considered to be limited to patients with hyperactive delirium, as more than 80% of the patients in the present study either had hyperactive or mixed subtype of delirium. Studies do suggest that a large proportion of delirium (32-67%) remains unrecognized in general medical wards [30] and only a minor proportion of inpatients with delirium (10%) are referred to psychiatry consultation-liaison services. [4],[31],[32] It is important to remember that in general it is suggested that mortality is higher in patients with hypoactive delirium. [13] If these facts are taken into account, the actual mortality rates in patients with delirium may be higher, as many patients with same would not have been evaluated by psychiatry CL team. Hence, it can be said that the mortality rate in the present study may be an underestimate.

It is important to note that most of the previous studies which have evaluated the mortality rates in patients with delirium have done so in elderly and those admitted to ICUs. In contrast, the present study predominantly had young patients (79.7%) and further it was noted that young patients had higher mortality rates than elderly despite having nearly equal Charlson Comorbidity index. This finding suggests that delirium may be a risk factor for mortality irrespective of the age of the patients. Similar finding was noted in the previous study from our center too. [7]

Following limitations must be kept in mind while interpreting results of the present study. Studies have shown higher mortality rates in patients with delirium during the first 1-2 years after the diagnosis. However, we did not follow-up the cohort after discharge. We also did not study the influence of treatment on the outcome of delirium.

To conclude, present study suggests that the common risk factors for development of delirium include use of more than three medications, higher urea/creatinine level, anemia, immobility prior to onset of delirium, smoking, being admitted to intensive care unit, history of alcohol dependence, use of restraints, hyponatremia, acute infection and use of NSAIDS. The most common etiologies associated with delirium include metabolic/endocrine disturbances, organ insufficiency and systemic infection. About one-sixth of the patients with delirium die during the initial inpatient stay. Mortality is higher in patients who are young and who are restrainted.

 
 :: References Top

1.Grover S, Subodh BN, Avasthi A, Chakrabarti S, Kumar S, Sharan P, et al. Prevalence and clinical profile of delirium: A study from a tertiary-care hospital in north India. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2009;31:25-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Mattoo SK, Grover S, Gupta N. Delirium in general practice. Indian J Med Res 2010;131:387-98.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
3.Inouye SK, Rushing JT, Foreman MD, Palmer RM, Pompei P. Does delirium contribute to poor hospital outcomes? A three-site epidemiologic study. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:234-42.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Sirois F. Delirium: 100 cases. Can J Psychiatry 1988;33:375-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.McCusker J, Cole M, Abrahamowicz M, Primeau F, Belzile E. Delirium predicts 12-month mortality. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:457-63.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Tennen GB, Rundell JR, Stevens SR. Mortality in medical-surgical inpatients referred for psychiatric consultation. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2009;31:341-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Grover S, Shah R, Kr A. The mortality rate among patients with delirium 6 months after diagnosis by a consultation-liaison psychiatric team. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2012;23:189-92.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Leslie DL, Zhang Y, Holford TR, Bogardus ST, Leo-Summers LS, Inouye SK. Premature death associated with delirium at 1-year follow-up. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1657-62.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Inouye SK. The dilemma of delirium: Clinical and research controversies regarding diagnosis and evaluation of delirium in hospitalized elderly medical patients. Am J Med 1994;97:278-88.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, Speroff T, Gordon SM, Harrell FE Jr, et al. Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA 2004;291:1753-62.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Adamis D, Treloar A, Martin FC, Macdonald AJ. Recovery and outcome of delirium in elderly medical inpatients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2006;43:289-98.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Curyto KJ, Johnson J, TenHave T, Mossey J, Knott K, Katz IR. Survival of hospitalized elderly patients with delirium: A prospective study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001;9:141-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.Sharma A, Malhotra S, Grover S, Jindal SK. Incidence, prevalence, risk factor and outcome of delirium in intensive care unit: A study from India. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2012;34:639-46.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.Grover S, Chakrabarti S, Shah R, Kumar V. A factor analytic study of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 in untreated patients with delirium. J Psychosom Res 2011;70:473-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Mattoo SK, Grover S, Chakrabarty K, Trzepacz P, Meagher D, Gupta N. Symptom profile and etiology of delirium in a referral population in Northern India: Factor analysis of the DRS-R-98. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2012;24:95-101.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Jain G, Chakrabarti S, Kulhara P. Symptoms of delirium: An exploratory factor analytic study among referred patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2011;33:377-85.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4 th edn) Text Revision (DSM-IVTR). Washington DC: APA; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Trzepacz PT, Mittal D, Torres R, Kanary K, Norton J, Jimerson N. Validation of the delirium rating scale-revised-98: Comparison with the delirium rating scale and the cognitive test for delirium. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2001;13:229-42.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.Franco JG, Trzepacz PT, Mejía MA, Ochoa SB. Factor analysis of the colombian translation of the delirium rating scale (DRS), revised-98. Psychosomatics 2009;50:25-62.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Meagher DJ, Moran M, Raju B, Gibbons D, Donnelly S, Saunders J, et al. Motor symptoms in 100 patients with delirium versus control subjects: Comparison of subtyping methods. Psychosomatics 2008;49:300-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.Meagher D, Moran M, Raju B, Gibbons D, Donnelly S, Saunders J, et al. Phenomenology of delirium: Assessment of 100 adult cases using standardized measures. Br J Psychiatry 2007;190:135-41.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Grover S, Mattoo SK, Aarya KR, Das PP, Chakrabarty K, Trzepacz P, et al. Replication analysis for composition of the Delirium Motor Subtype Scale (DMSS) in a referral cohort from Northern India. Psychiatry Res 2013;206:68-74.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:613-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]    
24.Rajlakshmi AK, Mattoo SK, Grover S. Relationship between cognitive and non-cognitive symptoms of delirium. Asian J Psychiatr 2013;6:106-12.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    
25.Khurana V, Gambhir IS, Kishore D. Evaluation of delirium in elderly: A hospital-based study. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2011;11:467-73.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.Patten SB, Williams JV, Haynes L, McCruden J, Arboleda-Florez J. The incidence of delirium in psychiatric inpatient units. Can J Psychiatry 1997;42:858-63.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Ritchie J, Steiner W, Abrahamowicz M. Incidence of and risk factors for delirium among psychiatric inpatients. Psychiatr Serv 1996;47:727-30.  Back to cited text no. 27
[PUBMED]    
28.Meagher D. Motor subtypes of delirium: Past, present, and future. Int Rev Psychiatry 2009;21:59-73.  Back to cited text no. 28
[PUBMED]    
29.Elie M, Cole MG, Primeau FJ, Bellavance F. Delirium risk factors in elderly hospitalized patients. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:204-12.  Back to cited text no. 29
[PUBMED]    
30.Mittal D, Majithia D, Kennedy R, Rhudy J. Differences in characteristics and outcome of delirium as based on referral patterns. Psychosomatics 2006;47:367-75.  Back to cited text no. 30
[PUBMED]    
31.Meagher D. Delirium: The role of psychiatry. Adv in Psychiatr Treat 2001;7:433-43.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Francis J, Martin D, Kapoor WN. A prospective study of delirium in hospitalized elderly. J Am Med Assoc 1990;263:1097-101.  Back to cited text no. 32
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]

This article has been cited by
1 Risk of Mortality Among Patients Treated With Antipsychotic Medications
Liang-Jen Wang,Sheng-Yu Lee,Shin-Sheng Yuan,Kang-Chung Yang,Chun-Ju Yang,Tung-Liang Lee,Yu-Chiau Shyu
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2016; 36(1): 9
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow