Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 1888  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::Related articles
 ::  Article in PDF (588 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  Abstract
 :: Introduction
 ::  Materials and Me...
 :: Results
 :: Discussion
 :: Acknowledgment
 ::  References
 ::  Article Figures
 ::  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2411    
    Printed92    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded25    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


 


 
  Table of Contents     
BRIEF REPORT
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 60  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 386-389

Prevalence and genotypic relatedness of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital


1 Department of Microbiology, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
2 Department of Microbiology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Punjab and Haryana, India

Date of Submission09-May-2013
Date of Decision24-Nov-2013
Date of Acceptance11-Apr-2014
Date of Web Publication5-Nov-2014

Correspondence Address:
Dr. B A Fomda
Department of Microbiology, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: Funded by ICMR,, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.143964

Rights and Permissions


 :: Abstract 

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is the most common multidrug-resistant pathogen causing nosocomial infections across the world. MRSA is not only associated with significant mortality and morbidity but also places a large economic strain on our health care system. MRSA isolates are also typically resistant to multiple, non-β-lactam antibiotics. We conducted a prospective study in a tertiary care hospital, to determine the prevalence of MRSA and to establish the clonal distribution of MRSA isolates recovered from various clinical specimens. Materials and Methods: Clinical samples were cultured and S. aureus was identified as per standard microbiological procedures. Susceptibility testing was done by agar disk diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method as recommended by CLSI. Methicillin resistance was detected by phenotypic methods namely, oxacillin disc diffusion (ODD), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of oxacillin, cefoxitin disk diffusion (CDD), and MIC of cefoxitin. Amplification of mecA gene by PCR was used as gold standard for detection of methicillin resistance. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing was performed for MRSA isolates. Results: Out of 390 S. aureus isolates, 154 (39.48%) isolates were MRSA and 236 (60.51%) isolates were MSSA. Penicillin was the least effective antibacterial drug against the hospital associated S. aureus isolates with 85.64% resistance rate. All the isolates were susceptible to vancomycin. The MRSA showed a high level of resistance to all antimicrobials in general in comparison to the MSSA and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Multiplex PCR performed for all strains showed amplification of both the mecA and nucA genes in MRSA strains whereas MSSA strains showed amplification of only nucA gene. PFGE of these isolates showed 10 different patterns. Conclusion: Prevalence of MRSA in our hospital was 39.48%. Most of these isolates were resistant to erythromycin, clindamycin, cotrimoxazole, and ciprofloxacin, whereas high sensitivity was seen to vancomycin followed by gentamicin. CDD and MIC for cefoxitin showed 100% sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV as compared to PCR for mecA gene. In maximum number of isolates PFGE type A pattern was seen suggesting clonal relatedness.


Keywords: CDD, MRSA, MIC, multiplex PCR, ODD,pulse field gel electrophoresis typing


How to cite this article:
Fomda B A, Thokar M A, Bashir G, Khan A, Kour A, Zahoor D, Ray P. Prevalence and genotypic relatedness of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital. J Postgrad Med 2014;60:386-9

How to cite this URL:
Fomda B A, Thokar M A, Bashir G, Khan A, Kour A, Zahoor D, Ray P. Prevalence and genotypic relatedness of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Nov 17];60:386-9. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2014/60/4/386/143964



 :: Introduction Top


Staphylococcus aureus is a versatile human pathogen that causes diseases ranging from relatively mild infections of the skin and soft tissue to life-threatening sepsis, pneumonia, and toxic shock syndrome (TSS). [1] The emergence of strains resistant to methicillin and other antimicrobial agents has become a cause of major concern because methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections are not only a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, but they also place a large economic strain on our health care system. [2]. This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of MRSA and to establish the clonal distribution of methicillin resistant S. aureus isolates recovered from various clinical specimens in our hospital setting.


 :: Materials and Methods Top


Setting

The study was carried out in Department of Microbiology; Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Kashmir, India over a period of 3 years. Ethical clearance was obtained from institute's ethical clearance committee.

Isolation and identification of S. aureus

Samples like blood, pus, urine, wound swabs, and other body fluids were inoculated onto 5% sheep blood agar, MacConkey agar and Hi-chrome UTI agar and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Identification of S. aureus was done by standard microbiological tests.

Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern

The antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method according to CLSI guidelines. [3] The antibiotic discs used in our study [Table 1], were procured from Hi-media Mumbai, India. Inducible clindamycin resistance was determined by D-test. ATCC 25923 was used as control.
Table 1: Susceptibility results for MSSA and MRSA to other antibiotics by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method


Click here to view


Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antibiotics such as oxacillin and cefoxitin (Sigma St. Louis, Mo, USA) against S. aureus was determined by using micro broth dilution method according to CLSI guidelines. [3] ATCC 29213 was used as control.

Multiplex PCR

PCR for mecA and nucA gene was carried out for 390 S. aureus strains by the methodology described by Mason et al.[4] Isolates that were mecA and nucA positive were considered as MRSA. ATCC 43300 were used as positive control.

Genotyping by pulsed field gel electrophoresis

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing of SmaI (Fermentas, UK)-digested DNA was carried out by a protocol described previously by Bannerman et al.[5] The criteria proposed by Tenover et al. were employed to analyze the DNA fingerprints generated by PFGE. [6]

Statistical analysis

Frequencies were obtained by Chi square and Fisher's exact test (two tailed) with the SPSS statistical program (version 15).


 :: Results Top


Of the 1200 specimens screened, S. aureus was isolated from 390 (32.5%). Most of the isolates were recovered from pus (44.01%) followed by blood (30.33%), body fluids (17%), and (8.66%) urine samples. Maximum number 334 (85.64%) of isolates were resistant to penicillin while 100% were susceptible to vancomycin.

Out of 390 isolates, 154 (39.48%) were MRSA and 236 (60.51%) were MSSA by PCR [Figure 1], CDD and MIC of cefoxitin. All the isolates resistant to cefoxitin had an MIC of >32 μg/ml. Using ODD method 143(36.66%) isolates were identified as MRSA and 247(63.33%) as MSSA. MIC of oxacillin showed 148(37.94%) isolates as MRSA, all having MIC over >4 μg/ml. The MRSA isolates showed a high level of resistance to all antimicrobials in general in comparison to the MSSA and the difference was statistically significant [Table 1].
Figure 1: Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR amplified products with mec-A and nuc-A specific primers.Lane M: 100 bp ladder, Lane 1-3: Showing amplicons of mec-A gene (533 bp) and nuc-A gene (270 bp)

Click here to view


Phenotypic methods compared with PCR as gold standard showed 100% sensitivity and specificity for CDD and MIC for cefoxitin, while as 92.85% and 96.1% for ODD and MIC for oxacillin respectively. All the four methods showed 100% specificity and PPV [Table 2].
Table 2: Comparison of phenotypic detection methods with genotypic method (n=390)

Click here to view


All isolates were subjected to PFGE. Ten common patterns were identified among the MRSA isolates. Strains showing same PFGE pattern were grouped as a pulsotype and assigned alphabetically (A to J). Maximum strains (n = 40) belonged to band type A [Figure 2].
Figure 2: PFGE profile from SmaI macro restriction fragment of the MRSA isolates. Lane M: DNA marker, Lane A-J: MRSA strains showing different PFGE profile

Click here to view



 :: Discussion Top


The accurate and early determination of methicillin resistance is of key importance in the prognosis of infections caused by S. aureus. Detection of mecA gene or its product, penicillin binding proteins (PBP2a), is considered the gold standard for MRSA confirmation. [7]

Sensitivity and specificity for CDD and MIC for cefoxitin was 100% in our study and MIC for cefoxitin of >32 μg/ml was seen in all mecA positive isolates, showing that there is a direct correlation of presence of mecA and cefoxitin MIC >32 μg/ml as reported by Salimnia et al.[8] Results of CDD and MIC for cefoxitin were in concordance with PCR for mecA gene in our study, as reported earlier. [9],[10]

A high negative and positive predictive value of 100% for CDD in our study correlates well with the findings of Velasco et al.[11] CDD and MIC for cefoxitin are both equally good for detection of MRSA; however, CDD because of its simplicity is more suitable and can be an alternative to PCR for detection of MRSA in resource constraint settings.

A high specificity and low sensitivity of ODD as compared to CDD as seen in our study has also been reported by Anand et al.[10] while a higher (100%) sensitivity but lower specificity (89%) has been reported by Adaletti et al.[9]

The prevalence of MRSA was 39.48% in our study. A high prevalence of MRSA (51.8%) has been reported in India by Mallick et al.[12] while an MRSA prevalence of 23% has been reported from Australia, 67% from Japan, 40% from South Pacific, and 32% from USA. [13]

Probable reasons for good susceptibility of MRSA isolates to vancomycin (100%) and gentamicin (81.81%) could be due to the fact that these drugs are infrequently used as first line therapy in our hospital. The high resistance rates of our MRSA isolates to other classes of antibiotics reflect the excessive use of these antibiotics. Thus, they can no longer be relied upon for empirical treatment of suspected staphylococcal infections in our setting.

PFGE, because of its great discriminatory power and high degree of specimen typeability is accepted as the gold standard for the molecular typing of S. aureus. [7] Although, PFGE is time-consuming and labor intensive, in this study it was used as it helps in tracking genetic changes which occur in a relatively short time, while multilocus sequence typing (MLST) another typing method is more suitable for studying long-term genetic variations in S. aureus. [14]

PFGE analysis of the MRSA strains in our study demonstrated that most of the strains were highly related to one another, suggesting clonal expansion in this population; however, Gyathri et al. have suggested diverse PFGE pattern in their MRSA isolates that were related to each other by MLST and spa typing. [14]

From time to time measures were taken to control MRSA infection by MRSA screening, use of contact precautions and promotion of hand hygiene in our hospital. Given the questionable benefit of MRSA screening and isolation strategies for preventing healthcare-associated infections as well as the fact that such isolation is not cost effective and can result in social isolation of patients, many in the infection control community have begun to explore other strategies like decolonization of MRSA positive patients or universal decolonization of all patients with mupirocin and chlorhexidine. [15]

Hence, we conclude that the prevalence of MRSA in our hospital is 39.48% with maximum isolates being clonally related belonging to PFGE type A pulsotype. The resistance of MRSA isolates to other classes of antibiotics except vancomycin and gentamicin is quite high. CDD can be recommended for testing methicillin resistance in S. aureus isolates routinely in microbiology laboratories.


 :: Acknowledgment Top


We are thankful to Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) for financial assistance in this study. File no-5/3/3/5/2006-ECD1.

 
 :: References Top

1.
Lowy FD.Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 1998;339:520-32.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Witte W, Kresken M, Braulke C, Cuny C.Increasing incidence and widespread dissemination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals in central Europe, with special reference to German hospitals. Clin Microbiol Infect 1997;3:414-22.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Franklin R. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-First Informational Supplement,M100-S21. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute; 2011;68-80.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mason WJ, Blevins JS, Beenken K, Wibowo N, Ojha N, Smeltzer MS. Multiplex PCR protocol for the diagnosis of Staphylococcal infection. JClinMicrobiol 2001;39:3332-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bannerman TL, Hancock GA, Tenover FC, Miller JM. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as a replacement for bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:551-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Tenover FC, Arbeit R, Archer G, Biddle J, Byrne S, Goering R, et al. Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:407-15.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Cosgrove SE, Qi Y, Kaye KS, Harbarth S, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y. The impact of methicillin resistance in staphylococcus aureus bacteremia on patient outcomes: Mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:166-74.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Salminia H, Brown WJ. Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: Comparison of Phoenix Oxacillin and Cefoxitin MICs, MicroScanOxacillin MIC, Oxacillin andCefoxitin Disk Diffusion, and mecA Gene Detection.As presented at the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC), 2005.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Adaleti R, Nakipoglu Y, Karahan ZC, Tasdemir C, Kaya F. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and conventional methods in detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dev Ctries 2008;2:46-50.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Anand KB, Agrawal P, Kumar S, Kapila K. Comparison of cefoxitin disc diffusion test, oxacillin screen agar, and PCR for mecA gene for detection of MRSA. Indian J Med Microbiol 2009;27:27-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
11.
Velasco D, del Mar Tomas M, Cartelle M, Beceiro A, PerezA, Molina F, et al. Evaluation of different methods for detecting methicillin(oxacillin) resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;55:379-82.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Mallick SK, Basak S. MRSA--too many hurdles to overcome: A study from Central India. Trop Doct 2010;40:108-10.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Schmitz FJ, Smayevsky J, Bell J, Jones RN, et al. SENTRYPartcipants Group.Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: Frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1999. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32(Suppl 2):S114-32.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Arakere G, Nadig S, Swedberg G, Macaden R, Amarnath SK,Raghunath D. Genotyping of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus strains from two hospitals in Bangalore, South India. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:3198-202.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Michael BE, Richard P.W: Screening in patients for MRSA. N Engl J Med;2013;24:2314-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow