Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 1856  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Article Submission Resources Sections Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::  Article in PDF (192 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1155    
    Printed21    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded21    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


 


 
  Table of Contents     
LETTER
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 62  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 48

Poisoning in secondary hospital


Department of Pediatrics, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication5-Jan-2016

Correspondence Address:
M P Roy
Department of Pediatrics, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.173211

Rights and Permissions




How to cite this article:
Roy M P. Poisoning in secondary hospital. J Postgrad Med 2016;62:48

How to cite this URL:
Roy M P. Poisoning in secondary hospital. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Jun 26];62:48. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2016/62/1/48/173211


Sir,

I read with interest the research article on acute poisoning cases. [1] I have a few concerns regarding the paper.

1. In a hospital setup, it is always difficult to measure incidence rate as the catchment area is ill-defined. A few patients from the vicinity might have gone to the other two hospitals in the area while a few others from the neighboring districts might have got admitted at the hospital mentioned in the study. So, this problem will prevail in all hospital-based studies. The same problem holds true for calculation of mortality rate. 2. There was no age-wise breakup. For example, children are more prone to be victims of accidental poisoning. So, the overall percentage (4.57%) would have been different, had the authors analyzed the group separately. 3. The definition of preventable poisoning was not given. 4. Psychological guidance, as mentioned in the conclusion, may be considered for tailored (focusing on individuals) or targeted intervention (focusing on groups) and not for mass intervention. 5. There is always a possibility of underreporting because of the associated stigma. It should be mentioned in the limitations. 6. A prospective study with focus on socioeconomic status might be undertaken as self-poisoning has multiple personal, social, and economic facets.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
 :: References Top

1.
Indu TH, Raja D, Ponnusankar S. Toxicoepidemiology of acute poisoning cases in a secondary care hospital in rural South India: A five-year analysis. J Postgrad Med 2015;61:159-62.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow