Executive functions and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: Comparisons between probands, parents and controls in India
T Bhatia1, K Garg1, M Pogue-Geile2, VL Nimgaonkar3, SN Deshpande1,
1 Department of Psychiatry, Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi -110 001, India
2 Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, USA
3 Department of Psychiatry and Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, WPIC, Pittsburgh, USA
Department of Psychiatry, Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi -110 001
Background: Cognitive impairment is said to be a core feature of schizophrenia. Executive function is an important cognitive domain. Aim: This study was undertaken to assess cognitive impairment among Indian patients with schizophrenia (Sz) or schizoaffective disorder (SzA), compared with their parents and unaffected individuals (controls). Settings and Design: Executive functions as measured by Trail-making Test (TMT), of patients and their parents were compared with controls. The patients were recruited from the Outpatients«SQ» Department (OPD) of a government hospital. Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed as Sz or SzA (n=172) and their parents (n=196: families n=132, 119 fathers and 77 mothers) participated. We also included 120 persons with no history of psychiatric illness. Cognitive function was assessed with the TMT. The Information Score of the Post Graduate Institute Battery of Brain Dysfunction test, developed in India for Indian subjects was used as a proxy for general fixed knowledge. Statistical Analysis: Logistic and linear regression was used to compare cognitive deficits of cases, parents and controls. Results: Cases and their parents took significantly more time than controls on Part B of the TMT. There were no statistically significant differences between cases and parents on any of the TMT parameters. Using regression analysis, the most significant correlates of all TMT parameters among cases were with occurrence of auditory hallucinations and current age. Conclusion: Cases, as well as their parents showed more cognitive impairment than controls on the TMT.
|How to cite this article:|
Bhatia T, Garg K, Pogue-Geile M, Nimgaonkar V L, Deshpande S N. Executive functions and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: Comparisons between probands, parents and controls in India.J Postgrad Med 2009;55:3-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Bhatia T, Garg K, Pogue-Geile M, Nimgaonkar V L, Deshpande S N. Executive functions and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: Comparisons between probands, parents and controls in India. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2009 [cited 2020 Apr 5 ];55:3-7
Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2009/55/1/3/43546
Cognitive deficits are regarded as core aspects of the disease process in schizophrenia (Sz), independent of clinical symptomatology or anti-psychotic medications. Such deficits also strongly influence outcome.  While the degree of cognitive impairment can vary considerably among individuals, deficits are present in most cognitive domains in any given sufferer. ,, Although most authors claim that deficits seen in Sz are heterogeneous, neuropsychological studies place strong emphasis on impairments in "executive functions". ,,,, Executive functions refer to cognitive processes that regulate capacity for attention, abstract reasoning, and integration of other cognitive skills. In general, Sz patients experience difficulty in formulating plans and combining information from various sources to perform new tasks.
The Trail-making Test (TMT) is a standard measure of perceptual-motor and set-shifting skills and tests both executive functions as well as attentional abilities. It is an easily administered paper and pencil test and is a standard component of the Halstead-Reitan Battery, , most often used for screening for cognitive impairment. There are two parts of this test: Part A (numbers) and Part B (numbers and alphabets alternating with each other). Sherer and Adams  interpret the TMT specifically Part B, as an executive task.
In general, performance was considered to be impaired if scores exceeded 40 sec for Part A and 91 sec for Part B of TMT when the test was administered to English-speaking American subjects. However, normal Indian subjects were found to score significantly differently on the TMT compared to these normative values.  Familiarity with English might be the reason for this difference. Lack of familiarity with cognitive tests in certain cultures may lead to scores that differ from American individuals. 
Compared with controls Sz/Schizoaffective disorder (SzA) sufferers and at risk subjects (such as relatives of Sz patients) perform abnormally on a wide variety of experimental information processing and neuropsychological paradigms.  Conflicting results on executive performance of siblings and other first-degree relatives of schizophrenic patients have been reported. ,,, Some studies showed that relatives could perform variably depending on the cognitive tests used, poorly on the verbal fluency or the Trail-making Part B but normally on the wechsler wisconsin card sorting test (WCST) or the Trail-making Part A. ,, In contrast, Dolfus  did not find any difference on TMT between parents and cases. These relatives performed poorly on other tests of executive functioning. Persons with Sz/SzA and their siblings compared to controls were significantly impaired in executive functioning, measured by Part B of TMT. , So there are conflicting reports regarding executive functions of relatives of patients with Sz which need to be tested.
The present study compared Sz/SzA cases and their parents on TMT to determine factors affecting scores and to assess whether this test was an appropriate marker of vulnerability to Sz/SzA. There is scarcity of such studies in India. Very little research has been carried out on cognitive impairment in Sz in India and cultural factors can play a significant role in determining neurocognitive impairment in schizophrenia patients and their relatives. The TMT was selected because it is an easily administered paper and pencil test requiring only knowledge of English alphabets and numbers. This would facilitate participation of maximum number of subjects, including those not fully literate in English.
Materials and Methods
Sample: A total of 172 cases (n=60 female and n=74 male) affected with Sz (n=134) or 38 cases (n=23 female and n=15 male) affected with SzA participated in the study. Cases were aged above 15 years and had a working knowledge of English numbers and letters. There were some cases whose parents did not participate in the study (n=23 cases). Dosages and types of antipsychotic medications varied from time to time. Hence it was not possible to calculate total exposure to antipsychotic medications.
The TMT initially was administered to 218 available parents conversant with English letters and alphabets. Parents with major psychiatric illness were excluded (n=18 with Sz/SzA n=4 with depression). A total of 196 parents (n=132 families, n=77 mothers, n=119 fathers) were finally included for analysis. There were fewer mothers than fathers, as many women were not literate in English.
The controls (n=120, n=86 males, n=34 females) were adults who sought treatment at the Department of Dermatology at Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, a publicly funded tertiary care hospital in New Delhi. To avoid bias every fifth patient reporting to the Dermatology OPD of the same hospital was recruited. If the fifth patient did not meet the inclusion criteria the next patient was approached for participation. All were screened for absence of psychiatric illness as described in Bhatia et al . 
Evaluation: Hindi version of Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS) , (http://www-grb.nimh.nih.gov/gi.html) was used to ascertain cases. The TMT was administered on all cases, parents and controls to assess executive function. The information Subtest of Verbal Adult Intelligence Scale of Post Graduate Institute Battery of Brain Dysfunction (PGIBBD)  was administered to all three groups of participants and is marked 'Information Scores'. This battery is based on the Wechsler Adult Information Scale (WAIS) and has been adapted to Indian conditions; PGIBBD is developed and tested in India and presently is extensively used to determine areas of brain damage. This subtest consists of 33 items of tests of general and fixed knowledge acquired by the subject. This test is included as proxy for measuring the intelligence of the participants.
Procedure: Cases were participants of our ongoing research, recruited after ethical clearance from the hospital Ethics Committee was received. They were recruited from private and public hospitals and clinics in New Delhi and surrounding areas to make the sample representative. Their treating psychiatrists were contacted initially and after preliminary information and verbal consent, they referred willing subjects to us. All referred subjects who met inclusion criteria were contacted irrespective of their gender, age or race. After written informed consent DIGS was administered (cases alone) and consensus diagnosis was established according to DSM IV. All participants provided written informed consent before participation. DIGS was also administered on all parents suspected of suffering from mental illness.
The TMT was administered to the case as well as parents. Time taken to complete all parts of the test was recorded. Demographic details (age, education etc) were also recorded for parents.
The subject's responses were recorded verbatim for information test and the test discontinued if seven consecutive failures occurred. One point was scored for each correct response.
Statistical analysis: The distribution of the Part A and B of TMT scores was skewed among cases and parents. Hence logistic regression with groups as dependent variables was conducted separately for different pairs (parent / controls, parent / cases and case / controls). Age, sex and information scores were included as covariates. Regression analyses were performed to test for effects of different clinical and demographic variables on TMT among cases. Variables included were age, school years, age at onset, diagnosis, delusions (ever present), auditory hallucinations (ever present), visual hallucinations (ever present). Data was analyzed using SPSS 11.0.
Demographic characteristics: The mean ages (± standard deviations, SD) of the cases, parents and controls were 30.34±9.78, 55.67±8.70 and 30.11±12.83 years respectively. Mean ages of cases and controls were not different statistically. Parents were expectedly older than cases (t=11.74, P=0.003). Gender-wise distribution of the sample was 48.2% females, 51.8% males among cases, 39.3% females, 60.7% males among parents and 28.3% females, 71.7% males among controls. There were significantly more number of males than females among controls and parents (χ2 =11.74, df=2, p=0.003). Information scores of cases, parents and controls were 18.51±6.71, 22.06±6.12, 20.89±5.38 respectively [Table 1]. There was no significant difference between parents and controls on information score. Parents and controls both had significantly higher information scores than cases (t=5.25, P P =0.001)
The mean years of education (± standard deviations, SD) were comparable: for cases 12.25±3.14 years, parents 12.43±3.950 years and controls 12.13±3.13 years. There was no significant difference between cases, parents and controls on education.
Cases versus controls: There were no significant differences between cases and controls on Part A of the TMT. On Part B of the TMT, cases (216.51±173.48secs) took significantly more time than controls (150.69±49.84secs) (Wald χ2 = 9.85, P =0.002). Similarly on Part (B-A), cases took significantly more time (129.87±157.25secs) than controls (75.3±48.15secs). Number of females was significantly more in cases than in controls (Wald χ2 = 9.42, P =0.002).
Parents versus controls: Parents and controls were compared on Parts A, B and (B-A) of the TMT. There was no significant difference between these groups on Part A of the TMT. However, the parents took significantly more time to complete Part B (229.11±173.48 sec) than controls (150.69±49.84sec) (Wald χ2 =4.86, P =0.027). This could be attributed to significant age differences between the groups (Wald χ2 = 73.32, P 2 = 6.23, P =0.01) [Table 3].
Analyses among patients: Regression analyses were performed to test for effects of different clinical and demographic variables on TMT among cases. Variables selected for analysis included age, school years, age at onset, diagnosis, delusions (ever present), auditory hallucinations (ever present), visual hallucinations (ever present). Analysis suggested that higher scores on Part A of the TMT were positively predicted by age, diagnosis (Sz/SzA), and 'ever' presence of auditory hallucinations. On Part B, the main correlates were older age and presence of auditory hallucinations (ever present). Present age and information score influenced Part B-A.
The key finding of this study is that both parents and cases performed worse than controls. There was no significant difference between parents and cases on TMT. To our knowledge, this is one of the first few reports of TMT function among Sz patients in India. We found that Indian subjects with Sz/SzA performed worse than controls on Part B of the TMT, as reported by others (in individuals of Caucasian ancestry). ,, Impaired performance on such tests can be the direct consequence of an isolated deficit in executive ability, or an indirect manifestation related to more widespread cognitive dysfunction such as impaired attention and global dementia. , Age seemed to adversely affect executive function, but the effect was accelerated among schizophrenic subjects more than controls. 
Our cases performed similar to their much older parents, contrary to previous studies. , Rybakowski and Borkowska  reported that time taken to complete Part B of TMT by parents was intermediate between cases and controls. Though there was no statistically significant difference between men and women on education in our sample, women had significantly lower scores on information scores than men, perhaps because Indian women are more likely to be confined to their houses and acquired less general knowledge and practice with executive tasks.
The parents took more time to complete Part B of TMT than normal subjects, in agreement with other studies. ,, In our sample, parents and cases showed similar deficits, suggesting a vulnerability marker for Sz/SzA. There were significantly more fathers than mothers in the study. It appeared that mothers were not familiar with such tasks and hence were less adept at completing timed activities.
Age was an important predictor of TMT performance in our cases. Our results are consistent with those by Keefe.  In the Giovagnoli  study, only for Part A did females take longer than males where scores were affected by age, education and general intelligence.
Cognitive abilities were adversely affected by psychotic symptoms, even if present for some period during the course of their illness. Those with prominent affective symptoms (SzA) seemed to be less impaired than those with schizophrenia. The subjects with higher information scores took less time on all parts of the TMT, except Part A in case of parents. In a study by Giovagnoli  on Italian subjects, the TMT was affected by age, education and general intelligence. As TMT involves knowledge of English alphabets and numbers, literacy affects performance on these tests.
According to Bilder  and Liddle, , disorganized behavior and negative symptoms are related to several neurocognitive deficits, whereas positive symptomatology is not correlated with neurocognitive impairments. In contrast, auditory hallucinations were significantly correlated to impaired cognitive functioning in our case sample. This happened even if the subject was not suffering from hallucinations during the test. Positive symptoms have been correlated to deficits on tests such as verbal memory and distractibility. , While Davidson and McGlashan  found positive correlations between negative symptoms and cognitive deterioration, especially among older subjects, a meta-analysis by Nieuwenstein  reported few statistically significant correlations (measured on scales of positive and negative symptoms). Patterns of associations between cognitive functioning and negative and positive symptoms appear to depend on the sensory modality of the cognitive task being used.
In conclusion, we report a moderately large Indian sample of Sz/SzA individuals performed worse than controls on Part B and Part (B-A) of the TMT, but not Part A. An older parental group performed similar to cases on all four parts after adjusting for age. The parents performed worse than the controls, suggesting that executive function may be a vulnerability marker for Sz. There are some limitations of this study. The neurocognitive measure used in our study was cross-sectional. Parents were older than controls. The medication status of subjects was also not controlled for, but this may not account for the parent / control differences.
This work was supported in part by grants from NIH (MH56242), US (N-443-645), Indo-Israel (BT/IC-2/ISRAEL/2001, 2) and University Grants Commission of India [F.5-112/2000 (HRP).
|1||Holthausen EA, Wiersma D, Cahn W, Kahn RS, Dingemans PM, Schene AH, et al . Predictive value of cognition for different domains of outcome in recent-onset schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2007;149:71-80.|
|2||Harvey PD, Davidson M, White L, Keefe RS, Hirschowitz J, Mohs RC, et al . Empirical evaluation of the factorial structure of clinical symptoms in schizophrenia: Effects of typical neuroleptics on the brief psychiatric rating scale. Biol Psychiatry 1996;40:755-60.|
|3||Kremen WS, Seidman LJ, Faraone SV, Pepple JR, Lyons MJ, Tsuang MT. The '3 Rs' and neuropsychological function in schizophrenia: A test of the matching fallacy in biological relatives. Psychiatry Res 1995;56:135-43.|
|4||Goldberg TE, Egan MF, Gscheidle T, Coppola R, Weickert T, Kolachana BS, et al . Executive subprocesses in working memory: Relationship to catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met genotype and schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:889-96.|
|5||Zalla T, Joyce C, Szφke A, Schürhoff F, Pillon B, Komano O, et al . Executive dysfunctions as potential markers of familial vulnerability to bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2004;121:207-17.|
|6||Baxter RD, Liddle PF. Neuropsychological deficits associated with schizophrenic syndromes. Schizophr Res 1998;30:239-49.|
|7||Lysaker PH, Bell MD, Bryson G, Kaplan E. Neurocognitive function and insight in schizophrenia: Support for an association with impairments in executive function but not with impairments in global function. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1998;97:297-301.|
|8||Liddle PF. Inner connections within domain of dementia praecox: Role of supervisory mental processes in schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1995;245:210-5.|
|9||Mahurin RK, Velligan DI, Hazleton B, Mark Davis J, Eckert S, Miller AL. Trail making test errors and executive function in schizophrenia and depression. Clin Neuropsychol 2006;20:271-88.|
|10||Reitan RM, Wolfson D. Conventional intelligence measurements and neuropsychological concepts of adaptive abilities. J Clin Psychol 1992;48:521-9.|
|11||Sherer M, Adams RL. Cross-validation of Reitan and Wolfson's neuropsychological deficit scales. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1993;8:429-35.|
|12||Bhatia T, Shriharsh V, Adlakha S, Bisht V, Garg K, Deshpande SN. The trail making test in India. Indian J Psychiatry 2007;49:113-6. |
|13||Stanczak DE, Stanczak EM, Awadalla AW. Development and initial validation of an Arabic version of the expanded trail making test: Implications cross-cultural assessment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2001;16:141-9.|
|14||Franke P, Maier W, Hardt J, Hain C. Cognitive functioning and anhedonia in subjects at risk for schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 1993;10:77-84.|
|15||Gur RE, Nimgaonkar VL, Almasy L, Calkins ME, Ragland JD, Pogue-Geile MF, et al . Neurocognitive endophenotypes in a multiplex multigenerational family study of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:813-9.|
|16||Scarone S, Abbruzzese M, Gambini O. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test discriminates schizophrenic patients and their siblings. Schizophr Res 1993;10:103-7.|
|17||Stratta P, Mancini F, Mattei P, Daneluzzo E, Bustini M, Casacchia M, et al . Remediation of Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in schizophrenia: A controlled study. Psychopathology 1997;30:59-66.|
|18||Keefe RS, Silverman JM, Mohs RC, Siever LJ, Harvey PD, Friedman L, et al . Eye tracking, attention, and schizotypal symptoms in nonpsychotic relatives of patients with schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997;54:169-76.|
|19||Roxborough H, Muir WJ, Blackwood DH, Walker MT, Blackburn IM. Neuropsychological and P300 abnormalities in schizophrenics and their relatives. Psychol Med 1993;23:305-14.|
|20||Keefe RS, Silverman JM, Roitman SE, Harvey PD, Duncan MA, Alroy D, et al . Performance of nonpsychotic relatives of schizophrenic patients on cognitive tests. Psychiatry Res 1994;53:1-12.|
|21||Harris JG, Adler LE, Young DA, Cullum CM, Rilling LM, Cicerello A, et al . Neuropsychological dysfunction in parents of schizophrenics. Schizophr Res 1996;20:253-60. |
|22||Dollfus S, Lombardo C, Bιnali K, Halbecq I, Abadie P, Mariι RM, et al . Executive/attentional cognitive functions in schizophrenic patients and their parents: A preliminary study. Schizophr Res 2002;53:93-9.|
|23||Thompson JL, Watson JR, Steinhauer SR, Goldstein G, Pogue-Geile MF. Indicators of genetic liability to schizophrenia: A sibling study of neuropsychological performance. Schizophr Bull 2005;31:85-96.|
|24||Silverstein ML, McDonald C, Meltzer HY. Differential patterns of neuropsychological deficit in psychiatric disorders. J Clin Psychol 1988;44:412-5.|
|25||Nurnberger JI Jr, Blehar MC, Kaufmann CA, York-Cooler C, Simpson SG, Harkavy-Friedman J, et al . Diagnostic interview for genetic studies: Rationale, unique features, and training: NIMH Genetics Initiative. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:849-59.|
|26||Deshpande SN, Mathur MN, Das SK, Bhatia T, Sharma S, Nimgaonkar VL. A Hindi version of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies. Schizophr Bull 1998;24:489-93.|
|27||Pershad DV. Information subtest of Verbal Intelligence Scale in Handbook of PGI Battery of Brain Dysfunction. Agra, National Psychological Corporation; 1990|
|28||McGrath J, Scheldt S, Welham J, Clair A. Performance on tests sensitive to impaired executive ability in schizophrenia, mania and well controls: Acute and subacute phases. Schizophr Res 1997;26:127-37.|
|29||Nixon SJ, Hallford HG, Tivis RD. Neurocognitive function in alcoholic, schizophrenic, and dually diagnosed patients. Psychiatry Res 1996;64:35-45.|
|30||Levin S, Yurgelun-Todd D, Craft S. Contributions of clinical neuropsychology to the study of schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol 1989;98:341-56.|
|31||Nixon SJ, Tivis R, Ceballos N, Varner JL, Rohrbaugh J. Neurophysiological efficiency in male and female alcoholics. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2002;26:919-27|
|32||Fucetola R, Seidman LJ, Kremen WS, Faraone SV, Goldstein JM, Tsuang MT. Age and neuropsychologic function in schizophrenia: A decline in executive abilities beyond that observed in healthy volunteers. Biol Psychiatry 2000;48:137-46.|
|33||Laurent A, d'Amato T, Naegele B, Murry P, Baro P, Foussard N, et al . Executive and amnestic functions of a group of first-degree relatives of schizophrenic patients. Encephale 2000;26:67-74.|
|34||Rybakowski JK, Borkowska A. Eye movement and neuropsychological studies in first-degree relatives of schizophrenic patients. Schizophr Res 2002;54:105-10.|
|35||Giovagnoli AR, Del Pesce M, Mascheroni S, Simoncelli M, Laiacona M, Capitani E. Trail making test: Normative values from 287 normal adult controls. Ital J Neurol Sci 1996;17:305-9.|
|36||Bilder RM, Mukherjee S, Rieder RO, Pandurangi AK. Symptomatic and neuropsychological components of defect states. Schizophr Bull 1985;11:409-19.|
|37||Liddle PF. Schizophrenic syndromes, cognitive performance and neurological dysfunction. Psychol Med 1987;17:49-57.|
|38||Liddle PF, Morris DL. Schizophrenic syndromes and frontal lobe performance. Br J Psychiatry 1991;158:340-5.|
|39||Green J, McDonald WM, Vitek JL, Haber M, Barnhart H, Bakay RA et al . Neuropsychological and psychiatric sequelae of pallidotomy for PD: Clinical trial findings. Neurology 2002;58:858-65.|
|40||Spring B. Distractibility as a marker of vulnerability to schizophrenia. Psychopharmacol Bull 1985;21:509-12.|
|41||Davidson L, McGlashan TH. The varied outcomes of schizophrenia. Can J Psychiatry 1997;42:34-43.|
|42||Nieuwenstein MR, Aleman A, de Haan EH. Relationship between symptom dimensions and neurocognitive functioning in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of WCST and CPT studies, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Continuous Performance Test. J Psychiatr Res 2001;35:119-25.|