Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & EMBASE  
     Home | Subscribe | Feedback  

LETTER
[Download PDF
 
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 60  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 415  

Authors' reply

AF Erkan, B Ekici, GG Demir, HF Töre 
 Department of Cardiology, Ufuk University, Ankara, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Asst. Prof. A F Erkan
Department of Cardiology, Ufuk University, Ankara
Turkey




How to cite this article:
Erkan A F, Ekici B, Demir G G, Töre H F. Authors' reply.J Postgrad Med 2014;60:415-415


How to cite this URL:
Erkan A F, Ekici B, Demir G G, Töre H F. Authors' reply. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Dec 16 ];60:415-415
Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2014/60/4/415/143988


Full Text

Sir

We present our reply to the comments by Tin SS et al.[1] Serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were determined with an automated system using the colorimetric method (Architect C8000, Abbott Park, IL, USA); a routine and common measurement method. The measurement was not manual. While the higher percentage of smoking observed in men may have contributed to lower HDL-cholesterol levels in this group, there are no significant differences with respect to gender and smoking status between group-I (moderate to high-risk Duke Treadmill Score (DTS)) and group-II (low-risk DTS). Hence, it is unlikely for smoking status to have played a role in the sex-specific difference we have observed in this study. We agree that age has an impact on DTS. The adjustment of DTS according to age with the relevant P value and the adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval can be found in Table 2.

References

1Tin SS, Wiwantikit V. Serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol and Duke Treadmill score. J Postgrad Med 2014;60:415.

 
Monday, December 16, 2019
 Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright  and disclaimer