Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 6702  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Articlesmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::Related articles
 ::  Article in PDF (19 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 


  IN THIS Article
 ::  Abstract
 ::  Introduction
 ::  Material and method
 ::  Results
 ::  Discussion
 ::  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed11763    
    Printed329    
    Emailed8    
    PDF Downloaded134    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal


   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 1991  |  Volume : 37  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 125-7

Effect of induction-delivery and uterine-delivery on apgar scoring of the newborn.


Department of Anaesthesiology, K. E. M. Hospital, Parel, Bombay, Maharashtra.

Correspondence Address:
Department of Anaesthesiology, K. E. M. Hospital, Parel, Bombay, Maharashtra.


  ::  Abstract

Very short or prolonged induction-delivery interval (i.e. less than 5 minutes or more than 15 minutes) and uterine-delivery interval of more than 90 seconds has a definite effect on the apgar scoring of a newborn especially when general anaesthesia is administered as compared to regional anaesthesia for caesarean section.

How to cite this article:
Kamat S K, Shah M V, Chaudhary L S, Pandya S, Bhatt M M. Effect of induction-delivery and uterine-delivery on apgar scoring of the newborn. J Postgrad Med 1991;37:125


How to cite this URL:
Kamat S K, Shah M V, Chaudhary L S, Pandya S, Bhatt M M. Effect of induction-delivery and uterine-delivery on apgar scoring of the newborn. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 1991 [cited 2021 Oct 25];37:125. Available from: https://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?1991/37/3/125/778




  ::   Introduction Top

Chances of neonatal asphyxia are more in babies born by caesarean section than those delivered per vaginum[5]. These may be related to the anaesthetic techniques employed.
The present study was carried out to determine the effect of anaesthetic techniques viz. general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia on the Apgar scoring of newborns in relation to the induction delivery interval and uterine delivery interval.

  ::   Material and method Top

Hundred and twenty patients undergoing caesarean section were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups: Group I and Group II.
Patients from Group I (n = 60) had A. S. A. grade 1 and received general anaesthesia. Half an hour after the intra-muscular injection of atropine sulfate (0.5 mg) all the patients were oxygenated for 5 min. and induced with intravenous sodium thiopentone (2.5%) followed by stixamethonium. Endotracheal intubation was carried out. Anaesthesia was maintained with a mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide and supplemented with intermittent doses of stixamethonium till the delivery of baby. The latter was then substituted by a non-depolarising relaxant, action of which was reversed by neostigmine (0.08 mg/kg) administered along with atropine sulfate (1.2 mg).
Group II comprised 60 patients with A. S. A. grade I who received spinal anaesthesia following atropinization. Lignocaine hydrochloride (5%) was used in these patients to produce subarachinold block.
In both the groups induction-delivery interval [i.e. the time interval from the beginning of induction with anaesthesia (1) to the delivery of the baby (D)] and uterine-delivery interval [i.e. the time interval from the uterine incision (U) to the delivery of the baby (D)] was noted using a stopwatch.
Apgar scoring was done in all the babies at the end of 1, 5 and 10 min respectively. Resuscitation measures, if applied, were also noted.

  ::   Results Top

As shown in [Table - 1], 8 patients from Group I had induction- delivery interval of less than 5 min. Forty patients had an interval between 5 and 15 min. The average interval for the group was 9.3 min. In Group II, none of the patients showed an interval less than 5 min; 34 patients had between 5 and 15 min; the average interval being 15.11 min.
Four patients from each group (7%) had uterine-delivery interval of more than 90 seconds and rest of the cases had less than 90. [Table - 2]) The average for Group 1 was 57 sec (range: 29-92 sec) and for Group II was 68 see (range: 20-91 sec).
Apgar scoring done at the end of 1 min in newborns revealed that 4 patients in Group I had very low scoring (less than-3) as against none from Group 2. Eighteen patients from Group I had scores between 4-6 and 38 had high scoring (between 7 and 10); the corresponding values from Group II being 8 and 52.
All the 4 patients from Group 1, who had uterine-delivery interval of more than 90 sec, had neonates with low to moderate Apgar scores. However the babies of 4 patients from Group II (with uterine-delivery interval of more than 90 -sec) showed high Apgar scoring.

  ::   Discussion Top

The results of the present study indicate that Apgar scoring done at 1 min was higher in neonates born following caesarean section carried out under spinal anaesthesia as compared to those under general anaesthesia.
A search was carried out to establish the relation of Apgar scoring to induction delivery time in both groups. It was observed that 8 patients from Group I had induction delivery interval of less than 5 min. and six of their neonates had low to moderate Apgar scores. This can be explained on the basis of the anaesthetic agent used. Sodium thiopentone, a thiobarbiturate reaches the foetus in seconds and begins to approach equilibrium between maternal circulation, umbilical vein and artery within 23 min. But as the uterine contractions are absent and cord compression is present in caesarean section, level of drug increases at the onset of anaesthesia and then falls at a rate determined by redistribution combined with maternal and foetal metabolism and excretion[3]. This result in higher levels of barbiturates for shorter induction delivery intervals; and therefore, it has been proposed that induction-delivery interval should be more than 5 min[4]. None of the patients from Group II had induction-delivery interval of less than 5 min and no baby had low Apgar score.
The induction-delivery intervals of more than 15 min were also found to be associated with moderate Apgar scoring. This may be due to higher degree of foetal acidosis as a result of longer duration of anaesthesia, but even in this group, neonates born under spinal anaesthesia showed high Apgar scoring.
The neonates of mothers having uterine delivery interval of more than 90 sec and receiving general anaesthesia showed low to moderate Apgar scoring as against those from Group II. Increase in uterine-delivery interval decreases efficiency of focto-materal exchange resulting in foetal acidosis. The low Apgar scoring at 1 min. may be the result of laryngeal spasm induced by aspiration of liquor or blood during intrauterine manipulation[5]. Patients who receive general anaesthesia have a relatively high level of circulating catecholamines (response evoked by handling the uterus) causing a reduction in placental blood flow[2], thereby leading to acidosis, the effect of which occurs for prolonged time when uterine-delivery interval increases. As against this, subarachnoid block prevents the local vasoconstrictor response secondary to surgery. This explains the high Apgar scoring in all the 4 neonates of mothers having high uterine-delivery interval but receiving spinal anaesthesia.
Thus, abnormal induction-delivery intervals (< 5 min and > 15 min) and uterine-delivery intervals < 90 sec have less effect on Apgar scoring of neonates of mothers who are administered spinal anaesthesia as compared to general anaesthesia.

  ::   References Top

1. Cosmi EV, Marx GF. The effect of anaesthesia on the foetal acid-base status of the fetus. Anaesthesiology 1969; 30:238-242.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Crawford JS, Davies P. Status of neonates delivered by elective caesarean section. Brit J Anaesth 1982; 54:1015-1022.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Finister M, Mark LC, Morishima HO, Moya F, Perel JM, James LS, Dayton PG, et al. Plasma thiopentone concentrations in the newborn following delivery under thiopental-nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Amer J Obstet Gynaecol 1966; 95:621-629.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Mango R, Selstam U, Karisson K. Anaesthesia for caesarean section II: effects of induction delivery on the respiratory adaptation of the newborn in elective caesarean section. Acta Anaesth Scand 1975; 19:250-259.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Marx GE. Anaesthesia for caesarean section: newer concepts. Ind J Anaesth 1975; 23:252-259.   Back to cited text no. 5    

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow