Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 5302  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Articlesmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Etcetera Contact
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::Related articles
 ::  Article in PDF (13 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  Abstract
 ::  Introduction
 ::  Case report
 ::  Discussion
 ::  References

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded165    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 13    

Recommend this journal


Year : 1992  |  Volume : 38  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 136-7

Female circumcision: a risk factor in postpartum haemorrhage.

Sir Humpry Davy Dept of Anaesthesia, Bristol Royal Infirmary.

Correspondence Address:
M M McSwiney
Sir Humpry Davy Dept of Anaesthesia, Bristol Royal Infirmary.

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

PMID: 0001303416

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

 :: Abstract 

A major postpartum haemorrhage occurred in a patient with a previous history of female circumcision. Following assisted vaginal delivery 6 litre blood loss occurred as a result of tears to the vagina and perineum. The tears were sutured, followed by insertion of vaginal packs. Replacement fluid therapy was given. To reduce the incidence of tears and accompanying haemorrhage, it is advisable to perform two episiotomies viz. anterior and midline posterior or mediolateral.

Keywords: Adult, Case Report, Circumcision, Culture, Episiotomy, Female, Human, Male, Perineum, injuries,Postpartum Hemorrhage, etiology,therapy,Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Vagina, injuries,

How to cite this article:
McSwiney M M, Saunders P R. Female circumcision: a risk factor in postpartum haemorrhage. J Postgrad Med 1992;38:136

How to cite this URL:
McSwiney M M, Saunders P R. Female circumcision: a risk factor in postpartum haemorrhage. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 1992 [cited 2023 Oct 1];38:136. Available from:

  ::   Introduction Top

Female circumcision is performed more widely than is generally recognized. Though the incidence is more in Third World Countries, health care workers in the Western World also encounter it due to immigration and increased world travel from these continents. We present here our experience of vaginal delivery of a female who had undergone pharonic circumcision.

  ::   Case report Top

A 22 year old, 45 kg Somalian patient, gravida 1 para 0 was admitted to the maternity hospital at 39 weeks of gestation. The patient was unable to speak English. The history from her husband included a previous infibulation.

On examination she was found to have a longitudinal lie with a cephalic presentation and spontaneous rupture of membranes. Vulval examination demonstrated a pharonic circumcision. Syntocinon was commenced to augment her contractions. Analgesia was provided with an intramuscular injection of pethidine (75 mg).

After 6 hrs, the cervix was found to be fully dilated, with the fetal head in the occipitoanterior position. The cardiotocograph demonstrated persistent type II decelerations. The patient was taken to the theatre for instrumental delivery with an anaesthetist present.

A moderate haemorrhage was noted from perineal tears around the fetal head, which had reached the perineum. Forceps were applied at this stage following a posterior episiotomy. A healthy male child was delivered followed by an intact placenta with satisfactory uterine contraction.

Immediately after delivery a rapid haemorrhage occurred. Inspection by the obstetrician demonstrated numerous vaginal and perineal tears.

At this stage, anaesthesia was induced and the patient was intubated and ventilated. A total blood loss of 6 litres occurred. Replacement fluid consisted of 2,500 ml of gelatin colloid, 7 units of blood and 5 units of fresh frozen plasma.

The numerous vaginal and perineal lacerations were sutured and the vagina was packed with proflavine hemisulphate pads. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit where intermittent positive pressure ventilation with sedation was continued overnight until the patient was extubated the following morning.

Forty-eight hrs later the vaginal pack was removed under anaesthesia. Satisfactory surgical repair and good haemostasis was evident. The patient was discharged a week later with instruction for future deliveries by Caesarean section.

  ::   Discussion Top

Though some observers believe female circumcision was originally a means of suppressing female sexuality and attempting to ensure chaste or monogamous behaviour, others believe that it started long ago among herders as a protection against rape of the young girls who took the animals out to pasture. In fact the origins have proved impossible to trace[1],[2].

It is performed more widely than is generally recognised and no continent is exempt. It is usually performed by the local 'Dayah' or 'Midwife' at a time varying between eight days and puberty[3]. It is estimated that more than 74 million women and children are circumcised in Africa alone. The operations are also practiced in many parts of the Middle East and with Moslennization were introduced into Indonesia and Malaysia. Reports that the operation is being performed in London led to the introduction of a bill in the House of Lords to prohibit excision or infibulation of the female sexual parts, unless two doctors agree that it is necessary for the physical health of the patient[4].

There are three main types of female circumcisions:[5],[6]

1. Circumcision proper - known in Muslim countries as sunna (traditional) is the mildest but also the rarest form. It involves the removal only of the clitora prepuce.

2. Excise - this involves amputation of the whole of the clitoris and all or part of the labia minora.

3. Infibulation - also known as pharonic circumcision. This involves amputation of the clitoris, the whole of the labia minora and at least the anterior two-thirds and often the whole of the medial part of the labia majora. The two sides of the vulva are then stitched together with silk, catgut or thorns, and a tiny silver of wood or a reed is inserted to preserve an opening for urine and menstrual blood. The girl's legs are usually bound together until the wound has healed which may take up to 40 days. In societies where pharonic circumcision is practiced, women are commonly reinfibiulated after each delivery, divorce and on the death of their husband.

The insertion of rock salt into the vagina after delivery to cause vaginal narrowing is common in the United Arab Emirates. 'Gishri' or vaginal cuts is another method used to achieve the same effect.

Most of the adverse health consequences are associated with the Pharonic circumcision[7],[8],[9] and are listed below:

A. Immediate: Haemorrhage; wound infection and urethral damage.

B. Gynaecological and genitourinary: haematocolpos; keloid formation; implantation dermoid cysts and abscesses; chronic pelvic infection; calculus formation; dyspareunia; infertility and urinary tract infection. and

C. Obstetric: perineal lacerations; haemorrhage; bladder, urethral, rectal injury; puerperal sepsis; delay in labour; vesico and rectovaginal fistulae; fetal brain damage and fetal loss.

The splitting of the circumcision skin fold, so called anterior episiotomy or cleinfibulation, is always necessary during labour[10]. If this is not done the rigidity of the circumcision scar may force the fetal head backwards, causing severe perineal lacerations, as occurred in our case. Thus, the patient requires two incisions, an anterior episiotomy and a midline posterior or mediolateral episiotomy.

 :: References Top

1. Hosken FP. Female genital mutilation in the world today; a global review. Int Health Services 1981; 11:415-430.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Fourcroy JL. A review of female circumcision. Urology 1983; 22:458-461.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Dareer A. Complications of female circumcision in the Sudan. Tropical Doctor 1983; 13:131-133  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Anonymous. Female circumcision. Editorial. Lancet 1983; 1:569.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Egwuatu VE, Agugua NE. Complications of female circumcision in Nigerian Igbos. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 88:1090-1093.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Sami IR. Female circumcision with special reference to the Sudan. Ann Tropical Paediatr 1986; 6:99-115.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.DeSilva S. Obstetric sequelae of female circumcision. Eur J Obstet Reprod Biol 1989; 32:233-240.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Myers R. Circumcision. Its nature and practice among some ethnic groups in Sourthern Nigeria. Social Sci Med 1985; 21:581-588.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Anonymous. A traditional practice that threatens health female circumcision. WHO Chronicle 1986; 40:31-36.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Verzin JA. Sequelae of female circumcision. Tropical Doctor 1975; 5:163-169.   Back to cited text no. 10    

This article has been cited by
1 Obstetric characteristics for a prolonged third stage of labor and risk for postpartum hemorrhage
Magann EF, Doherty DA, Briery CM, et al.
2 Postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal birth: An analysis of risk factors
Magann EF, Evans S, Hutchinson M, et al.
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL. 2005; 98 (4): 419-422
3 Female genital mutilation: an analysis of 522 cases in South-Western Nigeria
Dare F, Oboro V, Fadiora S, Orji E, Sule-Odu A, Olabode T
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2004; 24(3): 281-283
4 Female Genital Cutting: Clinical and Cultural Guidelines
Nour, N.M.
Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. 2004; 59(4): 272-279
5 Female genital mutilation: analysis of the first twelve months of a southeast London specialist clinic
Momoh C, Ladhani S, Lochrie DP, et al.
6 Female circumcision - (Not) a purely African problem
Dorflinger A, Kuhn P, Dreher E
7 Female circumcision
Abu Daia JM
SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL. 2000; 21 (10): 921-923
8 Female genital mutilation - postcircumcision vulval complications in Nigerians
Adekunle AO, Fakokunde FA, Odukogbe AA, Fawole AO
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1999; 19(6): 632-635
9 Female circumcision: the peril remains
Elchalal U, Ben-Ami B, Brzezinski A
BJU INTERNATIONAL. 1999; 83: 103-108
10 Practice and perceptions of female genital mutilation among Nigerian Igbo women
Adinma, J.I.B., Agbai, A.O.
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1999; 19(1): 44-48
11 Female circumcision in Nigeria: Is it not time for government intervention?
Briggs LA
HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS. 1998; 6 (1): 14-23
12 Ritualistic female genital mutilation: Current status and future outlook
Elchalal, U., Ben-Ami, B., Gillis, R., Brzezinski, A.
Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. 1997; 52(10): 643-651


Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow