| Article Access Statistics | | | Viewed | 13004 | | | Printed | 374 | | | Emailed | 15 | | | PDF Downloaded | 285 | | | Comments | [Add] | | | Cited by others | 4 | | |
|
Click on image for details.
|
|
| PAPERS |
|
|
|
| Year : 1994 | Volume
: 40
| Issue : 1 | Page : 18-20 |
Bacteriological profile of neonatal septicemia cases (for the year 1990-91).
M Mathur, H Shah, K Dixit, S Khambadkone, A Chakrapani, S Irani
Dept of Microbiology, Seth GS Medical College, Parel, Bombay, Maharashtra.
Correspondence Address:
M Mathur
Dept of Microbiology, Seth GS Medical College, Parel, Bombay, Maharashtra.
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
PMID: 0008568708 
Blood culture reports were studied in 1266 cases of clinically suspected neonatal septicemia, to determine the bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the cultured isolates. Blood culture was positive in 24.88% of cases. Gram negative septicemia was encountered in 87.1% of these neonates. Klebsiella and Enterobacter species were the predominant pathogens amongst Gram negative organisms. Of Gram positive isolates, Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant isolate (79.0%). Salmonella species was isolated in 2.4% of these cases.
Keywords: Antibiotics, pharmacology,Bacteremia, microbiology,Bacteria, drug effects,isolation &purification,Drug Resistance, Microbial, Human, Infant, Newborn, Time Factors,
How to cite this article:
Mathur M, Shah H, Dixit K, Khambadkone S, Chakrapani A, Irani S. Bacteriological profile of neonatal septicemia cases (for the year 1990-91). J Postgrad Med 1994;40:18-20 |
How to cite this URL:
Mathur M, Shah H, Dixit K, Khambadkone S, Chakrapani A, Irani S. Bacteriological profile of neonatal septicemia cases (for the year 1990-91). J Postgrad Med [serial online] 1994 [cited 2023 May 29];40:18-20. Available from: https://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?1994/40/1/18/579 |
Neonatal septicemia constitutes an important cause of morbidity and mortality amongst neonates in India[1]. However, with presently available antimicrobial agents, neonatal septicemia may betreated successfully. Early diagnosis and proper management of neonatal septicemia can bring down the morbidity and mortality substantially. Hence, the present study was undertaken to study the bacteriological profile of neonatal septicemia cases and their antimicrobial sensitivity pattern for planning strategy for the management of these cases.
The study includes 1266 cases of clinically suspected neonatal septicemia, on the basis of antenatal high risk factors and signs and symptoms of sepsis, including maternal fever, prolonged rupture of membranes, foul smelling lochia, temperature instability, feeding difficulties, respiratory distress, jaundice, convulsions and autonomic disturbances, admitted in the 'Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of King Edward Memorial Hospital, during the period January 1990 to August 1991. Blood samples (2-3 ml) were collected with all aseptic precautions for culture and sensitivity studies.
Blood cultures were processed using the standard technique described by Cruickshank et al[2] and the antibiotic sensitivity was performed by Kirby -Bauer's disc diffusion method[3]. The aerobic isolates were studied in detail by Gram's staining, colony characteristics, biochemical properties and antibiotic sensitivity.
Blood culture reports of these 1266 clinically suspected neonatal septicemia cases were reviewed and a culture positivity rate of 24.88% was observed. There was no growth in 75.12% of cases. [Table - 1] shows the types of organisms isolated.
Gram negative bacilli constituted 87.1% of the total isolates. Klebsiella and Enterobacter species were the predominant pathogens amongst Gram negative organisms. Salmonella More Details species was isolated from 2.4% of cases. Of Gram positive, Staphylococcus aureus  was the predominant isolate (79%).
[Table - 2] shows the antibiotic sensitivity of the isolates (in percentage) to the commonly used antibiotics.
For the effective management of neonatal septicemia cases, study of the bacteriological profile with their antibiotic sensitivity pattern plays a significant role. In this study, blood culture positivity rate in neonatal septicemia cases was 24.88%, whereas in 75.12% of cases there was no growth. A high culture positivity rate (56%) has been reported by Sharma et a1[4]. However, a low blood culture positivity rate (32%) has been observed by Mondal et al[5], which is comparable with the present study.
A low blood culture isolation rate in this study might be due to several reasons, e.g. administration of antibiotics before blood collection either to the mother or to the baby or the possibility of infection with anaerobes, which cannot be ruled out. Moreover, negative blood cultures do not exclude sepsis. Cases with negative blood culture have been reported with fatal illness and post-mortem evidence of infection[6]. Chow et al[7] reported that 26% of all neonatal septicemia was caused by anaerobes.
In the present study, Gram negative organisms constituted the major group of isolates (87.1%) from neonatal septicemia cases. Amongst this group Klebsiella species has been found to be predominant pathogen (38.5%) and the rest included Enterobacter species, Pseudomonas, Escherichia More Details coli, Proteus and Salmonella species. The predominance of Gram negative -corroborates with the findings of other workers[8],[9]. Another significant finding of the study is the isolation of Salmonella species in 2.4% of cases. An increasing incidence of Salmonella species has also been reported by Sharma et al4. A close watch needs to be kept on increasing incidence of this organism.
A comparatively low incidence (12.9%) of Gram positive organisms has been observed in our study, which correlates well with the findings (15%) of Sharma, et al4 Amongst the Gram positive organisms, Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant pathogen (79.0%).
The results of antibiotic sensitivity [Table - 2] revealed that, minority of Gram negative isolates were sensitive to gentamicin, cefotaxime and ceftazidine; whereas majority of Gram positive isolates showed sensitivity to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, ceftazidine and cefotaxime. Salmonella isolates showed sensitivity to ceftazidine, cefotaxime and gentamicin.
The antimicrobial sensitivity pattern differs in different studies as well as at different times in the same hospital10-12. This is because of emergence of resistant strains as a result of indiscriminate use of antibiotics.
In view of the above facts the strategy of antibiotic usage in the hospital must be reviewed. Since a sizeable number of blood culture specimens were negative by aerobic culture, the possibility of infection by anaerobes must be entertained and therefore, anaerobic culture should be performed routinely in cases of neonatal septicemia.
We thank Dir (Mrs) PM Pai, the Dean Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital for allowing us to publish the data.
| :: References | |  |
| 1. |
Thora S, Awadhya A, Chansoria A. Perinatal and infant mortality in urban slums under ICSS scheme. Indian Pediatr 1986; 23:595-598.  |
| 2. | Cruickshank K, Duguio JP, Marnion BP. Test for sensitivity to antimicrobial agents. In: Medical Microbiology, 12th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1980; 2:196. |
| 3. | Bauer AW, Kirby WNM, Sherris JC. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by standardized single disc method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966; 45:493. |
| 4. | Sharma PP, Halder D, Dutta AK. Bacteriological profile of neonatal septicemia. Indian Pediatr 1987; 24:1011-1017. |
| 5. | Mondal GP, Raghavan M, Bhat BV. Neonatal septicemia among inborn and outborn babies in a referral hospital. Indian J Pediatr 1991; 58:529-533. |
| 6. | Squire E, Pandre R, Todd J. Diagnosis of neonatal bacterial infections - hematologic and pathologic findings in fatal and non-fatal cases. Pediatrics 1979; 64:60-64. |
| 7. | Chow AW, Leake RD, Yarnanchi T. The significance of anaerobes in neonatal bacteremia. Analysis of 23 cases and review of literature. Pediatrics 1974; 54:736-745 |
| 8. | Choudhary P, Shrivastava DS, Agrawal L. Bacteriological study of neonatal infections. Indian Pediatr 1975: 12:459-463. |
| 9. | Guha DK, Jaspal D, Krishna Das MS. Outcome of neonatal septicemia, clinical and bacteriological profile. Indian Pediatr, 1978; 15:423-427. |
| 10. | Freedam RM, Ingram DI, Gross I. A half century of neonatal sepsis at Yale. Am J Dis Child 1981; 13:140-144. |
| 11. | Somu N, Shetty MV, Moses LG. A critical analysis of septicemia in infancy. Indian Pediatr 1976; 13:443-460. |
| 12. | Bhakoo ON, Agarwal KC, Narang A. Prognosis and the treatment of neonatal septicemia - a clinicobacterial study of 100 cases. Indian Pediatr 1974; 11:519-528.
|
Tables
[Table - 1], [Table - 2]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Neonatal septicemia in high risk babies in South-Eastern Nigeria |
|
| Ojukwu JU, Abonyi LE, Ugwu J, et al. | | JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE. 2006; 34 (2): 166-172 | | [Pubmed] | | | 2 |
Bacteriological analysis of blood culture isolates from neonates in a tertiary care hospital in India |
|
| Kumhar GD, Ramachandran VG, Gupta P | | JOURNAL OF HEALTH POPULATION AND NUTRITION. 2002; 20 (4): 343-347 | | [Pubmed] | | | 3 |
Ampicillin use in infant fever - A systematic review |
|
| Brown JC, Burns JL, Cummings P | | ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE. 2002; 156 (1): 27-32 | | [Pubmed] | | | 4 |
Study of antibiotic sensitivity pattern of common bacteria isolated from clinical material |
|
| Senthil Kumar, S.S., Abubacker, M.N., Pakialakshmi, N. | | Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences. 2001; 3(4): 321-325 | | [Pubmed] | |
|
|
|
|
