Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 2218  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Articlesmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Etcetera Contact
 ::   Next article
 ::   Previous article
 ::   Table of Contents

 ::   Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::Related articles
 ::   Citation Manager
 ::   Access Statistics
 ::   Reader Comments
 ::   Email Alert *
 ::   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded312    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 12    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2004  |  Volume : 50  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 247-251

A matched case-control study of risk factors for neonatal tetanus in Karachi, Pakistan

1 Epidemiology and Biostatistics division, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
2 Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
3 Division of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Michigan State University, MI, USA

Correspondence Address:
Syed Ahsan Raza
Epidemiology and Biostatistics division, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

PMID: 15623963

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background: Previous studies have identified various risk factors for neonatal tetanus (NNT) in rural areas of Pakistan. The present matched case control study was conducted to further evaluate these risk factors in an urban setting. Aim: The study was carried out to identify risk factors for NNT in Karachi. Materials and Methods: Patients of NNT (n = 125) diagnosed from January 1998 to February 2001 were recruited through a surveillance system of Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI). Two neighbourhood controls (n = 250) were matched for each case for gender and date of birth of the case. Statistical Analysis: Conditional logistic regression was performed to assess the independent effect of factors associated with NNT. Results: The final multivariable model identified subsequent application of substances on the umbilical cord (adjusted matched odds ratio [adj. mOR] = 5.1 [2.7-9.7]), home delivery (adj. mOR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1- 3.1) and illiterate mother (adj. mOR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.0- 2.0) as risk factors for NNT after adjusting for other variables in the model. Population attributable risk per cent (PAR %) for subsequent cord application was 69% and PAR % for home delivery was 31%. Conclusion: Health planners, while formulating control strategies through immunization programmes should also take into account the impact of post-delivery practices, such as ‘subsequent cord application’ along with pre-delivery practices. Health awareness regarding appropriate post-delivery practices should be promoted and counselling of pregnant women for giving preference to health care setting for delivery is also crucial.


Print this article     Email this article

Online since 12th February '04
© 2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow