Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 1184  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Articlesmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Etcetera Contact
 :: Next article
 :: Previous article 
 :: Table of Contents
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::Related articles
 ::  Article in PDF (192 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  Abstract
 ::  Methods and Mate...
 ::  Result
 ::  Discussion
 ::  References
 ::  Article Figures
 ::  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded189    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2004  |  Volume : 50  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 257-261

Does I-131-MIBG underestimate skeletal disease burden in neuroblastoma?

1 Departments of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Departments of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission19-Jun-2004
Date of Decision11-Sep-2004
Date of Acceptance09-Nov-2004

Correspondence Address:
Sukanta Barai
Departments of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

PMID: 15623965

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

 :: Abstract 

Background: Controversy persists as to the need for both MIBG and bone scanning in routine evaluation of neuroblastoma. Aim: To compare the efficacy of I-131- metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan against that of conventional Tc99m- methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone scan for the detection of skeletal deposition of neuroblastoma. Methods and Material: The study included 57 patients (36 boys, 21 girls: age range 1-14 years) of neuroblastoma who underwent both bone scan with Tc99m-MDP and I-131-MIBG scan within 15 days of each other at presentation and during follow-up. Results: At presentation 11(19.2%) patients had evidence of skeletal metastases on MDP scan against 7 patients who showed bony secondaries on MIBG scan. Of the 7 patients, with positive MIBG and MDP scans, MDP scan detected 11 sites whereas MIBG scan detected 7 sites. On follow-up study, 3 patients with initial abnormal MDP scan but normal MIBG scan, developed skeletal metastases detectable on MIBG scan, whereas 3 of the 46 patients who had normal MDP and MIBG scan at presentation; developed skeletal metastases detectable on MDP scan. MIBG scan was concordant in 2 of them but was normal in the third patient. Conclusion: I-131-MIBG underestimates skeletal disease burden in neuroblastoma. Therefore, Tc99m-MDP bone scan should remain a part of routine assessment of patients with neuroblastoma.

Keywords: Neuroblastoma, Tc99m-MDP bone scan, I-131-MIBG, Metastases.

How to cite this article:
Barai S, Bandopadhayaya G P, Malhotra A, Agarwal S, Kumar R, Dhanapathi H. Does I-131-MIBG underestimate skeletal disease burden in neuroblastoma? . J Postgrad Med 2004;50:257-61

How to cite this URL:
Barai S, Bandopadhayaya G P, Malhotra A, Agarwal S, Kumar R, Dhanapathi H. Does I-131-MIBG underestimate skeletal disease burden in neuroblastoma? . J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2004 [cited 2022 Dec 5];50:257-61. Available from:

Neuroblastoma is the second most common solid tumour in childhood and frequently metastasises to the bone marrow and bone matrix and many times patients present with distant metastases.[1] Skeletal scintigraphy has long been used as the procedure of choice to assess bony involvement in diseases of diverse aetiology including neuroblastomas.[2],[3] The detection of neuroblastoma deposits has been facilitated by the development and application of the radiopharmaceutical metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) labelled with 131I or 123I, which localizes in both primary and secondary deposits of neuroblastoma.[4] Controversy persists as to the need for both MIBG and bone scanning in routine evaluation of neuroblastoma.[5],[6],[7] The purpose of our study was to compare the utility of the I-131-MIBG scan with conventional Tc99m-MDP (Methyl Diphosphonate) bone scan for detection of skeletal deposition of neuroblastoma.

 :: Methods and Materials Top

Patients: This prospective study included fifty-seven patients (36 boys, 21 girls: age range 1-14 years) of neuroblastoma who underwent both bone- and MIBG- scan within fifteen days of each other at presentation and during follow-up between 1999 to April 2004. Patients were classified into various stages using the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS). These patients were enrolled in the study only after obtaining informed consent from legal guardians of the subjects.

Scintigraphy: Bone scan was performed 3 hours after intravenous administration of 185-1000MBq (5-27 mCi) of Tc99m-Methylene diphosphonate (Tc99m-MDP) using a dual head gamma camera fitted with low energy high resolution collimator (Varicam and MillenniumVG, General Electric, Milwaukee, USA). The dose was calculated on the basis of the patient's body surface area [adult dose of 1,000MBq/1.73m2]. Whole body acquisition was done using step and shoot method with 180 seconds per view. For any spinal lesion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) of the involved vertebra was performed.

MIBG scintigraphy was performed 48 and 72 hours after intravenous administration of 7.4-18.5 (0.2- 0.5 mCi) of I-131-Metaiodobenzyl Guanidine. Overlapping views from skull to feet were obtained for 20 minutes or 100,000 counts / view; whichever came first using a single head gamma camera equipped with a high-energy parallel-hole collimator (Orbitar, Siemens, Germany).

Quality Assurance of MIBG And Tc99m-MDP: Quality control studies for 131-I-MIBG were performed by the manufacturer (Radio Pharmacy division, Board of Radioisotope and Technology, Government of India) by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method and were certified to have more than 90% radiochemical purity at room temperature after thawing, when stored in a dry ice container. Any preparation that did not conform to this specification was not used.

Quality control of MDP preparations was performed at our laboratory by instant thin layer chromatography (ITLC) after every preparation of Tc99m-MDP to check the percentage of MDP molecule labelled by Tc99m. Any preparation with less than 98% labelling was discarded.

Data Analysis: Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians evaluated both sets of scans independently and both of them were blinded to findings of other investigations but were aware of primary disease and its location. All lesions were marked on standardized body maps for subsequent comparison.

Statistical analysis: Chi-square test was performed to assess any significant association between Tc99m-MDP bone scan and I-131-MIBG scan findings. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 :: Result Top

Of the fifty-seven patients, eleven (19.2%) patients had evidence of skeletal metastases at presentation on MDP bone scan. Out of these eleven patients with bone scan evidence of skeletal metastases; four had a normal MIBG scan for skeletal metastases. Of the seven patients, where both MIBG and MDP scan suggested skeletal metastases, MDP scan detected eleven sites where as MIBG scan detected seven sites. Number of lesions was identical in both MDP and MIBG scan in three patients [Figure - 1]a, b.

On follow-up study (mean of 8.5 months after initial study) 3 patients with abnormal MDP scan but normal original MIBG scan, developed skeletal lesion that was detected by. MIBG scan at the sites of abnormal MDP accumulation.

Three of the 46 patients who demonstrated no skeletal metastases initially on MDP and MIBG scans, developed skeletal lesions which were detected on MDP scan on follow up. Follow-up studies were carried out at a mean of 8.5 months after the initial study MIBG scan was concordant in 2 of them but was normal in the third patient.

There was no statistically significant difference between MDP bone scan and MIBG scan for detection of skeletal metastases at presentation and even during follow-up studies [Table - 1]. However the number of patients with skeletal metastases is very small (n=14) for any meaningful statistical analysis.

 :: Discussion Top

Radionuclide scintigraphy using various agents such as F-18, Tc99m-pyrophosphate, Tc99m-methylene diphosphonate and Gallium-67 has played a critical role in the evaluation of skeletal involvement in patients with neuroblastoma.[8],[9],[10] MIBG that is taken up specifically by the tissues of sympathetic nervous system and related tumours, has been shown to localize in both primary tumour and secondary deposits of neuroblastoma.[11] It has been suggested that MIBG scan may obviate the need for routine skeletal scintigraphy in cases of neuroblastoma since it can detect both soft tissue and skeletal lesions. However, this view has not been accepted universally. Although Shulkin et al reported that I-131-MIBG scan detects twice the number of skeletal lesions when compared with MDP bone scan.[7] Gordon et al showed that I-123-MIBG scan tends to underestimate the prevalence of bone involvement when compared to MDP bone scan.[6] The current study, using I-131-MIBG, reveals that at the time of diagnosis, MDP bone scan is more sensitive than I-131-MIBG scan in determining the presence or absence of bone involvement. When bone involvement was present, bone scan detected more lesions than MIBG scan. Moreover, MDP scan could detect skeletal metastases earlier in their stage of development than MIBG scan.

Precise documentation of individual foci of tumour deposit is less important for staging purpose than whether or not skeletal deposition is present.[12] High quality Tc99m-MDP bone scan images are required if the skeletal metastases of neuroblastoma, which generally develop in the metaphyses of long bones, are to be detected. Skeletal involvement in neuroblastoma can be focal or diffuse and sometimes bilaterally symmetrical. These abnormalities can be identified with experience on MDP bone scan only with meticulous attention to technical details. Disadvantages of bone scan include the physiological uptake in the growth plate of children, difficulty in detecting bilaterally symmetrical bone involvement and the lack of specificity for neuroblastoma. With good imaging techniques and experience, skeletal involvement of neuroblastoma can be detected with confidence on MDP bone scan. In the present study, it was observed that in patients with abnormal bone scan but normal MIBG scan, MIBG scan became abnormal during follow up period. This suggests that bone scan can detect skeletal metastases from neuroblastoma earlier than MIBG scan.

It has been suggested that MIBG may be a more sensitive tracer since it is specifically taken up by adrenal medulla and by tumours arising from adrenal medulla but not by normal bone. Therefore, bone involvement should be more readily detectable by MIBG scan. Despite the specificity of the underlying mechanism for tumour localization, there are disadvantages in the use of I-131-MIBG for the detection of skeletal involvement by neuroblastoma. These include longer imaging time (typically more than 20 minutes/view) due to low photon flux and low detection efficiency of sodium-iodide (Tl) crystal for the 364 KeV gamma photon, leading to a poor image quality and the necessity of imaging the patient up to 72-96 hours post-injection. The higher radiation burden per unit activity injected limits the permissible dose to 0.5-1.0 mCi/1.73 square meter body surface area. Pre-scan and post scan thyroid blockage with potassium iodide for up to seven days is required to prevent free I-131 from entering the thyroid gland. Despite this protection, up to 64% of patients develop thyroid dysfunction.[13] Moreover, many drugs like beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, tricyclic anti-depressants, reserpine, amphetamine and related compound interfere in the uptake and storage of MIBG.[14],[15] However, in our study drug interference was unlikely to be a significant contributing factor for the false negative MIBG studies as the referring paediatric oncologists were advised to discontinue any drugs known to interfere with MIBG uptake or storage, 72-94 hours prior to administration of MIBG till the completion of imaging and substitute them with alternative non-interfering drugs.

A review of literature suggests a complementary role for MIBG and MDP for evaluation of patients with neuroblastoma. Turba et al evaluated twenty-two patients of stage-IV neuroblastoma and concluded that 99mTc-MDP scan is necessary to fully assess bone involvement at diagnosis but MIBG scan is more suitable for monitoring response to therapy.[10] Sautter-Bihl et al evaluated twenty-three patients with both MDP and MIBG and concluded that MIBG alone may fail to visualize all skeletal involvement of neuroblastoma and should therefore be complemented by additional Tc99m-MDP scintigraphy.[3] Gordon et al evaluated 44 patients with both MDP and MIBG and concluded that underassessment of skeletal involvement by neuroblastoma occurs with I-123-MIBG scans and that one should not substitute I-123-MIBG for 99mTc-MDP bone scans in the staging of neuroblastoma.[6] Shulkin et al evaluated seventy-seven patients with both MDP and MIBG and concluded that MIBG is the better agent for characterizing the extent of disease and MDP is a valuable adjunctive agent that provides skeletal landmarks for comparison.[7] Parisi et al evaluated twenty patients with both MDP and MIBG and concluded that MIBG is the more efficacious agent for the scintigraphic evaluation of neuroblastoma.[16] Hadj-Djilani et al evaluated twenty patients with bone scan and MIBG and concluded that MIBG demonstrates more lesions than bone scan.[17] Hibi et al evaluated ten patients with abdominal neuroblastoma with I-131-MIBG and 99mTc-HMDP bone scan and concluded that I-131-MIBG detected metastatic lesions not predicted by 99mTc-HMDP and reflected tumour progression more sensitively than other known tumour markers such as urinary vanillylmandelic acid (VMA), homovanillic acid (HVA), serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and ferritin.[18] Bouvier et al evaluated thirty-five patients with bone scan and MIBG and reported that MIBG and bone scans are similar in the sensitivity (87.5%) for detection of skeletal metastasis but MIBG is much more specific (100%) than bone scan (81%). [19] However, their study included ten false negative MIBG studies, five of which were positive on bone scan. They recommended that the optimal procedure for the diagnosis of neuroblastoma,its extent and follow up, MIBG scan must be performed first; in case it does not demonstrate anything, then bone scan will greatly contribute to the diagnosis.

Findings of our study are in accordance with other reported studies in literature. In our study four of the eleven patients (36.3%) with skeletal metastases were missed on I-131-MIBG during initial staging [Figure - 2]a, b. The reason for higher number of lesions being detected on bone scan could be due to the fact that nearly 20 times higher dose of tracer is injected during bone scan compared to I-131-MIBG scan. During follow up, bone scans can remain positive for more than 6 months during the healing process while MIBG scan is only positive with viable functioning deposits.

Underassessment of disease is not unique to I-131-MIBG; Gordon et al also reported underassessment of skeletal disease burden using I-123-MIBG.[6] Hence our study raises concern about the current trend of replacing bone scan with a MIBG scan.[20],[21] Based on our findings, it could be recommended that Tc99m-MDP bone scan should remain a part of routine assessment of patients with neuroblastoma.

 :: References Top

1.Sohara Y, Shimada H, Scadeng M, Pollack H, Yamada S, Ye W, et al. Lytic bone lesions in human neuroblastoma xenograft involve osteoclast recruitment and are inhibited by bisphosphonate. Cancer Res 2003; 63:3026-31.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
2.Bhogate BM, Samuel AM, Ramanathan P. Bone scans in neuroblastoma. Indian J Cancer 1993; 30:5-9.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3.Sautter-Bihl ML, Bihl H, Heinze HG. The place of 99mTc-MDP skeletal scintigraphy in neuroblastoma. Is a new assessment necessary? Nuklearmedizin 1991; 30:7-12.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Andrich MP, Shalaby-Rana E, Movassaghi N, Majd M. The role of 131 iodine-metaiodobenzylguanidine scanning in the correlative imaging of patients with neuroblastoma. Pediatrics 1996; 97:246-50.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  
5.Gilday DL, Greenberg M. The controversy about the nuclear medicine investigation of neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med 1990; 31:135.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.Gordon I, Peters AM, Gutman A, Morony S, Dicks-Mireaux C, Pritchard J. Skeletal assessment in neuroblastoma-the pitfalls of iodine-123-MIBG scans. J Nucl Med 1990; 31:129-34.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Shulkin BL, Shapiro B, Hutchinson RJ. Iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine and bone scintigraphy for the detection of neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med 1992; 33:1735-40.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Garty I, Friedman A, Sandler MP, Kedar A. Neuroblastoma: imaging evaluation by sequential Tc-99m MDP, I-131 MIBG, and Ga-67 citrate studies. Clin Nucl Med 1989; 14:515-22.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  
9.Helson L, Watson RC, Benua RS, Murphy ML. F 18 radioisotope scanning of metastatic bone lesions in children with neuroblastoma. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1972; 115:191-9.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  
10.Turba E, Fagioli G, Mancini AF, Rosito P, Galli A, Alvisi P. Evaluation of stage 4 neuroblastoma patients by means of MIBG and 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy. J Nucl Biol Med 1993; 37:107 -14.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Geatti O, Shapiro B, Sisson JC, Hutchinson RJ, Mallette S, Eyre P, Beierwaltes WH. Iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy for the location of neuroblastoma: preliminary experience in ten cases. J Nucl Med 1985; 26:736-42.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  
12.Ikeda H, Iehara T, Tsuchida Y, Kaneko M, Hata J, Naito H, et al. Experience with International Neuroblastoma Staging System and Pathology Classification. Br J Cancer 2002; 86:1110-6.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
13.Van Santen HM, de Kraker J, van Eck BL, de Vijlder JJ, Vulsma T. Improved radiation protection of the thyroid gland with thyroxine, methimazole, and potassium iodide during diagnostic and therapeutic use of radiolabeled metaiodobenzylguanidine in children with neuroblastoma. Cancer 2003; 98:389-96  Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
14.Khafagi FA, Shapiro B, Fischer M, Sisson JC, Hutchinson R, Beierwaltes WH. Phaeochromocytoma and functioning paraganglioma in childhood and adolescence: role of iodine 131 metaiodobenzylguanidine. Eur J Nucl Med 1991; 18:191-8.  Back to cited text no. 14  [PUBMED]  
15.Lashford LS, Hancock JP, Kemshead JT. Meta-iodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) uptake and storage in the human neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-BE (2C). Int J Cancer 1991; 47:105-9.  Back to cited text no. 15  [PUBMED]  
16.Parisi MT, Greene MK, Dykes TM, Moraldo TV, Sandler ED, Hattner RS. Efficacy of metaiodobenzylguanidine as a scintigraphic agent for the detection of neuroblastoma. Invest Radiol 1992; 27:768-73.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]  
17.Hadj-Djilani NL, Lebtahi NE, Delaloye AB, Laurini R, Beck D. Diagnosis and follow-up of neuroblastoma by means of iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy and bone scan, and the influence of histology. Eur J Nucl Med 1995; 22:322-9.  Back to cited text no. 17  [PUBMED]  
18.Hibi S, Todo S, Imashuku S, Miyazaki T. 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy in patients with neuroblastoma. Pediatr Radiol 1987; 17:308-13.  Back to cited text no. 18  [PUBMED]  
19.Bouvier JF, Philip T, Chauvot P, Brunat Mentigny M, Ducrettet F, Maiassi N, et al. Pitfalls and solutions in neuroblastoma diagnosis using radioiodine MIBG: our experience about 50 cases. Prog Clin Biol Res 1988; 271:707-20.  Back to cited text no. 19  [PUBMED]  
20.Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, Carlsen NL, Castel V, Castelberry RP, et al. Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11:1466-77.  Back to cited text no. 20  [PUBMED]  
21.Castel V, Garcia-Miguel P, Canete A, Melero C, Navajas A, Ruiz-Jimenez JI, et al. Prospective evaluation of the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) and the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC) in a multicentre setting. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35:606-11.  Back to cited text no. 21  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]


[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2]


[Table - 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Miscellaneous Cancers (Lung, Thyroid, Renal Cancer, Myeloma, and Neuroendocrine Tumors): Role of SPECT and PET in Imaging Bone Metastases
Chua, S., Gnanasegaran, G., Cook, G.J.R.
Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. 2009; 39(6): 416-430
2 Biology and therapy of solid tumors in childhood
van den Berg, H.
Update on Cancer Therapeutics. 2006; 1(3): 367-383
3 Neuroblastoma: Role of bone imaging
Krishnamurthy, G.T.
Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. 2004; 50(4): 260-261


Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow