| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||3023 |
| Printed||83 |
| Emailed||2 |
| PDF Downloaded||15 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
Click on image for details.
|Year : 2011 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 347-349
Improving the rates of cadaver organ donation in a tertiary care transplant centre: A role for medical students and ancillary staff
SS Patwardhan, GV Kulkarni
Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Maharashtra, India
|Date of Submission||15-May-2011|
|Date of Decision||04-Aug-2011|
|Date of Acceptance||31-Aug-2011|
|Date of Web Publication||22-Nov-2011|
S S Patwardhan
Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Maharashtra
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Patwardhan S S, Kulkarni G V. Improving the rates of cadaver organ donation in a tertiary care transplant centre: A role for medical students and ancillary staff. J Postgrad Med 2011;57:347-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Patwardhan S S, Kulkarni G V. Improving the rates of cadaver organ donation in a tertiary care transplant centre: A role for medical students and ancillary staff. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Oct 29];57:347-9. Available from: https://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2011/57/4/347/90093
The concept of death is a void in man's understanding of the world. Cessation of cardiopulmonary function has been traditionally viewed as a benchmark to declare death. However, it can be artificially maintained for a required duration. Conversely, the functional loss that sets in due to damage caused to the vital centers of the brain is irreversible and hence brainstem death is equivalent to the death of the person. It is characterized by coma, absence of brainstem reflexes and apnea.  First proposed by two French scientists, Mollaret and Goulon, it has been a topic of debate ,,, and recognition of this state is an essential task for any physician due to its importance in deciding potential donors for cadaver organ transplantation.
Cadaver organ donation requires that a person be declared dead in order to procure the organs, as per the dead-donor rule.  Efficient and timely diagnosis, and referral of brainstem death, can help support the cause of organ transplantation.  Each cadaver donor can save six lives and restore eyesight to two blind individuals. This is particularly relevant in a highly populated country like India, where the demand for organs is always going to exceed the supply.  Hence there is a need to increase awareness about brainstem death and its relevance to cadaver organ donation amongst medical students and hospital staff, a fact highlighted by a recent study conducted in Bangalore which showed that the concept of brainstem death was understood by only a small number of medical postgraduate students.  An even more worrisome fact is the relative lack of this knowledge amongst the general population in spite of having the willingness and the openness to accept organ donation.  The main challenge that stands in the way of a successful transplant program is the next of kin, who, for a large measure, disagree to donate the organs of their deceased relative. Morals, religious beliefs, taboos, a lack of awareness about brain death, an incorrect method of breaking the news of death and putting forth the request for organ donation and a relative lack of trained transplant coordinators come in the way of convincing families about the benefits of organ donation. , They need to be educated sympathetically and calmly by physicians and medical social workers alike, to impress upon them the far-reaching effects of their selfless act.
Brainstem death is diagnosed, primarily, by clinical methods as it is very difficult to establish the evidence of its accuracy by experimental means. , The diagnosis is usually made by a team of doctors, which includes the attending physician, a neurologist or a neurosurgeon, an independent registered medical practitioner, being a specialist, nominated from a panel of names approved by the Appropriate Authority and a doctor on the administrative board of the hospital. The recent amendments proposed in the Transplantation of Human Organs Act have allowed selection of a surgeon/physician and an anesthetist/intensivist, in the event of the non-availability of a neurosurgeon/neurologist, from a panel already approved by the Appropriate Authority as specified by the Act. , The examination of the patient must be repeated after 6 h for confirming the diagnosis of brainstem death.  As medical students and interns, our role can involve the identification of brain-dead patients to supplement the ongoing transplant program at our institute. The program for renal transplantation has been running for almost a decade now while that for liver transplantation has been initiated last year.
We periodically visited the Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Units, including the Casualty and Trauma centre to screen patients who most likely fit into the category of brainstem-dead individuals. We did this by reviewing the histories of all the patients admitted. The following criteria were applied to narrow down the probable individuals:
- Histories suggestive of the likely etiology for brainstem death:
- Massive head trauma
- Intracranial hemorrhage
- Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
- Brain tumors.
- Conditions that could confound the diagnosis of brainstem death were excluded. A brief general examination and review of the patient files was undertaken for the same.
- The condition of coma was confirmed by noting a score of 3/15 on the Glasgow Coma Scale (E 1 M 1 V 1 ). Absence of decorticate or decerebrate posturing, spontaneous movements, responsiveness to noxious stimuli was noted.
- Body temperature taken to rule out hypothermia.
- Vital parameters were checked. Normal pulse ruled out arrhythmias. Blood pressure was measured to rule out shock/hypotension. Only patients on ventilators with absent voluntary respiratory efforts were considered.
- The patient's file was reviewed. Absence of prior intake of medications which could alter brain function was ensured which included Central Nervous System depressants, alcohols, anesthetic medications and neuromuscular blockers.
- Patient eligibility to be a satisfactory donor for the transplant program was ensured:
- Presence of blood-borne infections like HIV and Hepatitis B/C were excluded. Blood counts were checked to rule out infections.
- The hourly urine output was monitored.
Following this exhaustive workup, patients who fitted all the criteria were subjected to a complete neurological examination. The following signs were highly suggestive of brain death:
- No response to painful stimuli like deep pressure on supraorbital ridge, temporomandibular joint or sternum
- Absent pupillary reflex to light. Pupils fixed in a mid- to completely dilated position (4-9 mm)
- Absent oculocephalic (Doll's eye) reflex. Absent oculovestibular reflex
- Absent conjunctival, corneal reflexes and gag reflexes.
After confirmation by senior medical personnel, the ventilator was disconnected and the apnea test was performed. Once it was confirmed that the person was brain-dead, the necessary authorities were informed who then started the process of counseling the patient's relatives about the status of the patient and benefits of donating the organs.
Thus, it has been an important learning experience and has shown the necessity of involving more students, undergraduates and postgraduates alike, in this program to increase the awareness of brainstem death in the medical fraternity. This will ensure better counseling of the patient's relatives and a more organized approach towards organ procurement and transplantation, ultimately increasing the yield of such undertakings and saving more lives.
Public awareness, though an important aspect, may not necessarily be the main hurdle in this program. Failure of identification and institutional reporting of brainstem death in the Intensive Care units may also be equally responsible for the limited success garnered by such programs in India. There have been recent positive amendments to the Transplantation of Human Organs Act of India.  They have addressed this problem, though there has been a delay in its implementation. Mandatory reporting of such cases to appropriate authorities has to be strictly enforced by the district health services.
| :: Acknowledgment|| |
We sincerely thank Dr. Sujata Patwardhan and Dr. Avinash Supe for their timely guidance and support in the writing of this article.
| :: References|| |
|1.||Goila AK, Pawar M. The diagnosis of brain death. Indian J Crit Care Med 2009;13:7-11. |
|2.||Machado C, Kerein J, Ferrer Y, Portela L, de la C García M, et al. The concept of brain death did not evolve to benefit organ transplants. J Med Ethics 2007;33:197-200. |
|3.||A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. JAMA 1968;205:337-40. |
|4.||Guidelines for the determination of death. Report of the medical consultants on the diagnosis of death to the President′s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. JAMA 1981;246:2184-6. |
|5.||Truog RD, Robinson WM. Role of brain death and the dead-donor rule in the ethics of organ transplantation. Crit Care Med 2003;31:2391-6. |
|6.||Truog RD, Miller FG. The dead donor rule and organ transplantation. N Engl J Med 2008;359:674-5. |
|7.||de Groot YJ, Jansen NE, Bakker J, Kuiper MA, Aerdts S, Maas AI, et al. Imminent brain death: Point of departure for potential heart-beating organ donor recognition. Intensive Care Med 2010;36:1488-94. |
|8.||Hauptman PJ, O′Connor KJ. Procurement and allocation of solid organs for transplantation. N Engl J Med 1997;336:422-31. |
|9.||Bapat U, Kedlaya PG, Gokulnath. Organ donation, awareness, attitudes and beliefs among post graduate medical students. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2010;21:174-80. |
|10.||Wig N, Gupta P, Kailash S. Awareness of brain death and organ transplantation among select Indian population. J Assoc Physicians India 2003;51:455-8. |
|11.||Sotillo E, Montoya E, Martinez V, Paz G, Armas A, Liscano C, et al. Identification of variables that influence brain-dead donors′ family groups regarding refusal. Transplant Proc 2009;41:3466-70. |
|12.||Simpkin AL, Robertson LC, Barber VS, Young JD. Modifiable factors influencing relatives′ decision to offer organ donation: Systematic review. BMJ 2009;338: b991. |
|13.||Wijdicks EF, Varelas PN, Gronseth GS, Greer DM. Evidence-based guideline update: Determining brain death in adults: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2010;74:1911-8. |
|14.||Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs (Legislative Department) New Delhi. The Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994. Available from: http://india.gov.in/allimpfrms/allacts/2606.pdf. [cited 2011 Aug 22]. |
|15.||Note on the Amendments proposed in the Transplantation of Human Organs Act. Available from: http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Organ%20transplantation/Note%20on%20the%20Amendments%20proposed%20to%20 th e%20Act.pdf. [cited 2011 Aug 22]. |