| Article Access Statistics | | | Viewed | 9778 | | | Printed | 240 | | | Emailed | 3 | | | PDF Downloaded | 17 | | | Comments | [Add] | | | Cited by others | 6 | | |
|
Click on image for details.
|
|
 |
| CASE SERIES |
|
|
|
| Year : 2013 | Volume
: 59
| Issue : 4 | Page : 309-311 |
Marine stingray injuries to the extremities: Series of three cases with emphasis on imaging
S Srinivasan, JIE Bosco, R Lohan
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, 90 Yishun Central, Singapore 768228, Republic of Singapore
| Date of Submission | 19-Feb-2013 |
| Date of Decision | 12-Jun-2013 |
| Date of Acceptance | 13-Sep-2013 |
| Date of Web Publication | 17-Dec-2013 |
Correspondence Address:
S Srinivasan
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, 90 Yishun Central, Singapore 768228, Republic of Singapore
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.123163
Stingray injuries are usually reported from coastal regions. The injury is caused by the tail spine of the stingray, which can penetrate deep into the soft tissues, and the venom in the tail can cause extensive tissue damage. Imaging plays a very important role in patients with stingray injuries, especially to detect the presence of retained foreign bodies and its complications. We present three cases of stingray injuries to the extremities, with a special emphasis on radiographic findings. Embedded foreign bodies that were radiographically visualized were removed in two of the patients (one patient was discharged at request and was lost to follow-up). We also discuss the types of injuries, clinical presentation, importance of imaging and management considerations in stingray injuries.
Keywords: Envenomation, extremities, imaging, stingray
How to cite this article:
Srinivasan S, Bosco J, Lohan R. Marine stingray injuries to the extremities: Series of three cases with emphasis on imaging. J Postgrad Med 2013;59:309-11 |
How to cite this URL:
Srinivasan S, Bosco J, Lohan R. Marine stingray injuries to the extremities: Series of three cases with emphasis on imaging. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2013 [cited 2023 May 28];59:309-11. Available from: https://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2013/59/4/309/123163 |
| :: Introduction | |  |
Stingray injuries to humans are reported from various parts of the world, especially from the costal regions. The clinical features and management of stingray injuries have been discussed in the medical literature. Imaging plays a very important role in patients with stingray injuries, but is often understated. Radiograph and ultrasound are useful modalities to detect embedded foreign bodies in patients with stingray injuries to the extremities. We present case reports of three patients who had injuries to the extremities by marine stingray, with emphasis on their radiographic findings.
| :: Case Reports | | |
Case 1
A 38-year-old man, employed as a cook in a barbeque shop in Singapore, presented to the emergency department with a history of sting by a stingray in his index finger few hours before presentation. A 7-cm foreign body was still present. The finger was inflamed, swollen and tender. Vascularity was intact. Radiographs showed the tail spine (stinger) of the stingray penetrating deep into the index finger and in close proximity to the bone [Figure 1]a, b and c. The finger was cleansed with soap solution. Under aseptic precautions, the stinger was carefully removed under local anesthesia. Hemostasis was achieved and the patient was started on a course of oral antibiotics (Cephalexin 500 mg three-times daily for 2 weeks). The patient was discharged next day. On follow-up, the healing was good and the patient did not have any complications. | Figure 1: Frontal (a) and oblique (b) radiograph of the hand showed the deep penetration of the spine for around 1.5 cm into the index finger. The tip was close to the bone (middle phalanx). Significant length of the spine is seen outside the finger. Magnified view (c) central spine and the barbs
Click here to view |
Case 2
A 40-year-old man presented to the emergency department 10 days after being stung by a stingray while he was swimming in shallow sea water in the eastern part of Singapore. He had a puncture wound and swelling in his right ankle, and there was serous discharge from the wound. He had taken initial treatment with a local general practitioner and was prescribed oral Augmentin (Amoxycillin and Clavulanate - 625 mg three-times daily for 1 week). Injection Tetanus toxoid had been given. Presently, during his visit to the emergency department, radiograph [Figure 2] a and b] of the ankle showed a small sharp linear foreign body behind the medial malleolus, deep within the soft tissues (likely representing the barb of the spine). The patient was initially started on intravenous Augmentin (Amoxycillin and Clavulanate) and later, based on the culture of the fluid (which grew Shewanella), intravenous ceftazidime 1g three times daily was started. The wound was cleansed with soap solution and chlorhexidine. Under aseptic precautions, fluoroscopic removal was attempted twice to locate the foreign body after local anesthesia [Figure 2]c. However, it was not successful. The patient was discharged at his request and was lost to follow-up. | Figure 2 (a): Frontal (a) and lateral (b) radiograph of the right ankle showed a small linear foreign body (barb of the stingray spine) in the deep soft tissue plane behind the medial malleolus. Attempts were made to remove the foreign body (c), but were unsuccessful
Click here to view |
Case 3
A 22-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a history of sting by stingray in the right foot while swimming in shallow sea water in the northern part of Singapore. He presented 3 days after the injury with progressive swelling and persistent pain. Intramuscular injection of tetanus toxoid was given. Radiograph of the foot showed a sharp, linear foreign body (barb of the spine) in the deep soft tissues adjacent to the medial cuneiform [Figure 3]. Incision and debridement had to be done as there was necrosis of the subcutaneous tissue and the foreign body was present in the muscular plane. Intravenous antibiotics (Cefriaxone 1g twice daily) were also administered and the patient was discharged after 2 days. Oral Cephalexin tablets (500 mg TID) were prescribed for 2 weeks. | Figure 3: Frontal and oblique radiograph of the right foot showed a small, linear foreign body adjacent to the medial cuneiform bone that represents the barb of the stingray spine
Click here to view |
| :: Discussion | | |
Stingrays are cartilaginous fish seen in salt and fresh water, varying in size from 10 inches to 12 feet, taxonomically belonging to the class Chondrichthyes (subclass Elasmobranchii), forming part of one of the largest group of venomous marine animals. [1],[2] They are generally known to use their sting in the tail for self-defense, but have gained notoriety because of human attacks, when provoked. Such injuries are common in fishermen, aquarists and divers. A commonly described situation is accidental stepping by such people over the rays of these flattened creatures, which lay well camouflaged in shallow waters, partly buried in the sand, and results in injuries in the distal lower extremities. Fishermen are prone to upper limb injuries when they attempt to disentangle from fishing nets. [3] Up to 1500 cases are reported each year in the USA, with few fatal events. [3]
Most injuries are caused due to the tail of the stingray. The tail is a unique venom apparatus composed of its caudal appendage, spine that is made of strong bone-like cartilaginous material called vasodentin, small backward projections called barbs, its enveloping integumentary sheath and associated venom glands. [3] The venom usually contains toxic enzymes such as 5-nucleotidase and phosphodiesterase. The spine and the ventral glandular tissue are sheathed in an integument that tears open when the spine is plunged into a victim, causing an instantaneous release of venom. Pieces of distal spine or stinger or barbs and venom secreting may remain unrecognized in the deeper tissues and can cause prolonged toxic effects. [3] When envenomation occurs, a unique inflammatory cell infiltrate, composed mainly of lymphoid cells, CD3+ and CD4+ lymphocytes, and eosinophils is seen, responsible for the distinct pattern of acute inflammation. [4],[5] Complications such as abscess, delayed healing, tissue necrosis, gangrene, osteomyelitis, necrotizing fasciitis and septicemia can occur. [5]
Thoraco-abdominal stingray spine injuries are rare, but can be fatal due to arrhythmias, cardiac tamponade, aneurysms, major vascular injuries and arteriovenous fistulae. The cardiac complications are partly contributed by the cardiotoxicity of the venom. [6] A sensational case of death was that of the famous Australian naturalist Steve Irwin on 4 September 2006 by a penetrating stingray injury to the heart while filming off the Great Barrier Reef.
Imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of stingray injuries. [7],[8] Routine radiographic evaluation is mandatory in all the cases of stingray injuries of the extremities, mainly to rule out radiopaque foreign bodies as well as to rule out the presence of gas in the soft tissues, which may be due to secondary bacterial infection of the wound. The barbs and the stinger are usually radiopaque and are seen in radiographs. [3],[7],[8],[9] In all our cases, radiographs were extremely useful. In the first case, radiographs were useful to assess the depth of the penetration of the foreign body and also to rule out any bony injuries. In the second and third cases, the radiographs showed the retained foreign body and hence were helpful in further management. However, sometimes, the cartilaginous parts are not radiopaque [10] and hence ultrasonography (US) is needed in such cases. US may also be used in removal of the foreign body in cases where fluoroscopy guidance is difficult, as in our patient. [3],[7] Computed tomography (CT) may be necessary in visceral injuries such as the eye and in injuries of the thorax/abdomen, not only to visualize the foreign bodies but also to assess the severity and extent of the injuries. Intravenous contrast will be usually necessary. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is useful in cases of deep soft tissue infection, necrotizing fasciitis or myositis, and to rule out osteomyelitis.
The management depends on the site of injury. Injury to the face, thorax or abdomen requires emergent imaging, critical care monitoring and surgical management. In patients with stingray injuries to the extremities, thorough washing is performed. Only superficially located spines or stinger can be removed immediately at the site of the injury.
The management of injuries of the extremities can be classified into medical and surgical components. There are strong evidences suggesting that immersion in warm water is said to be an effective therapy [10],[11] that helps to deactivate the venom as well as to reduce the pain. However, there are reports that criticize the use of warm water therapy, especially after local anesthesia. [12] Warm water therapy is usually given as a first aid measure, and it is not a definitive therapy. None of our patients had warm water immersion as part of management. Other important components of medical management include antibiotic prophylaxis, analgesics and local anesthesia. In our cases, the cephalosporin group of antibiotics was very effective. In our second patient, the culture of the discharging fluid grew Shewanella that was sensitive to cephalosporin (Ceftazidime). Surgical exploration and debridement is the most important part of management. [3] Debridement was needed in our third patient as there was necrosis of the subcutaneous plane. Necrosis may worsen even after initial debridement and careful reexploration may be necessary. In patients with progressive necrosis, hyperbaric oxygen has been tried successfully to promote healing. [13] However, its role is controversial. [3]
We conclude that imaging plays an important role in stingray injuries and it is necessary for the radiologists and the treating physicians, especially in the coastal regions, to be aware of the nature of stingray injuries and potential complications and to understand the role of imaging.
| :: References | | |
| 1. | Williamson JA, Fenner PJ, Burnett JW, Rifkin JF, editors. Venomous and poisonous marine animals: A medical and biological handbook. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press/Fortitude Valley Queensland: Surf Life Saving Queensland Inc; 1996. p. 504. 
|
| 2. | Burk MP, Richter PA. Stingray injuries of the foot. Two case reports. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1990;80:260-2.
[PUBMED] |
| 3. | Diaz JH. The evaluation, management, and prevention of stingray injuries in travelers. J Travel Med 2008;15:102-9.
[PUBMED] |
| 4. | Germain M, Smith KJ, Skelton H. The cutaneous cellular infiltrate to stingrayenvenomization contains increased TIA+cells. Br J Dermatol 2000;143:1074-7.
[PUBMED] |
| 5. | Barber GR, Swygert JS. Necrotizing fasciitis due to Photobacterium damsel in a man lashed by a stingray. N Engl J Med 2000;342:824.
[PUBMED] |
| 6. | Russell FE, Panos TC, Kang LW, Warner AM, Colket TC3 rd . Studies on mechanisms of death from stingray venom. A report of two fatal cases. Am J Med Sci 1958;235:566-84.
|
| 7. | Slaughter RJ, Beasley DM, Lambie BS, Schep LJ. New Zealand's venomous creatures. N Z Med J 2009;122:83-97.
[PUBMED] |
| 8. | Flint DJ, Sugrue WJ. Stingray injuries: A lesson in debridement. N Z Med J 1999;112:137-8.
[PUBMED] |
| 9. | Scott C, Meier J. Clinical toxicology of venomous stingray injuries. In: Meier J, White J, editors. Handbook of clinical toxicology of animal venoms and poisons. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1995. p. 135-40.
|
| 10. | Clark RF, Girard RH, Rao D, Ly Bt, Davis DP. Stingray envenomation: A retrospective review of clinical presentation and treatment in 119 cases. J Emerg Med 2007;33:33-7.
[PUBMED] |
| 11. | Atkinson PR, Boyle A, Hartin D, and McAuley D. Is hot water immersion an effective treatment for marine envenomation? Emerg Med J 2006;23:503-8.
|
| 12. | Vijayasekran VS. Stingray envenomation or iatrogenic thermal burn. Aus NZ J Surg 2001;71:323-5.
|
| 13. | Rocca AF, Moran EA, Lippert FG. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of soft tissue necrosis resulting from a stingray puncture. Foot Ankle Int 2001;22:318-23.
|
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
A sting in the tail: An embedded stingray spine in a mid-1st millennium AD adult male skeleton from Rebun Island, Hokkaido, Japan |
|
| Rick J. Schulting, Daisuke Kubo, Kiyonori Nishida, Izumi Braddick, Minoru Yoneda, Hirofumi Kato, Hajime Ishida | | International Journal of Paleopathology. 2022; 38: 107 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Infections following stingray attacks: A case series and literature review of antimicrobial resistance and treatment |
|
| Jevan Cevik, David J. Hunter-Smith, Warren M. Rozen | | Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2022; : 102312 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
A New Endoscopic Approach to Remove a Retained Stingray Barb |
|
| Joseph Palatchi Oldak, Juan Carlos Angulo-Lozano | | Cureus. 2022; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Comparison of Radiographic, Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Retained Stingray Barb: A Cadaveric Study |
|
| Taylor A. Docter, Lauren B. Altschuh, Anthony J. Medak, Sheronda M. Statum, Christine B. Chung, Karen B. Van Hoesen, Christanne H. Coffey | | Wilderness & Environmental Medicine. 2021; 32(3): 302 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
Stingray spear injury to the pediatric spinal cord: case report and review of the literature |
|
| A. Caceres, N. A. Shlobin, S. Lam, J. Zamora, J. L. Segura | | Child's Nervous System. 2020; 36(8): 1811 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
Stingray Envenomation Treatment Recommendations |
|
| Karla Parsons,Dana N. Rutledge | | The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 2015; 11(3): 360 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
