Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & ISI's SCI  
Users online: 1559  
Home | Subscribe | Feedback | Login 
About Latest Articles Back-Issues Articlesmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Etcetera Contact
 
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
  
 RESOURCE Links
 ::  Similar in PUBMED
 ::  Search Pubmed for
 ::  Search in Google Scholar for
 ::  Article in PDF (222 KB)
 ::  Citation Manager
 ::  Access Statistics
 ::  Reader Comments
 ::  Email Alert *
 ::  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 ::  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1074    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded5    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


 


 
  Table of Contents     
EDITORIAL COMMENTARY
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 67  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 132-133

Bridge that disconnects?


1 Department of Cardiology, LTMM College and General Hospital, Mumbai, India
2 Department of Cardiology, Vishesh Neptune Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Date of Submission14-Apr-2021
Date of Decision11-May-2021
Date of Acceptance31-May-2021
Date of Web Publication20-Aug-2021

Correspondence Address:
Y Lokhandwala
Department of Cardiology, LTMM College and General Hospital, Mumbai
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_333_21

Rights and Permissions




How to cite this article:
Lokhandwala Y, Vyas A. Bridge that disconnects?. J Postgrad Med 2021;67:132-3

How to cite this URL:
Lokhandwala Y, Vyas A. Bridge that disconnects?. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 6];67:132-3. Available from: https://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2021/67/3/132/324237




The intramural course of an epicardial coronary artery was first described anatomically (autopsy) by Reyman[1] in 1737 and angiographically in 1960,[2] while Polacek in 1961 was the first to use the term “myocardial bridge” for the entity. Autopsy prevalence for the bridge has always been higher (5.4% to 85.7%) compared to imaging (0.5% to 1.6%), possibly because the segment of a coronary artery tunneled intramuscular may not always be compressed in systole to be visible angiographically.[3] Like the varied prevalence rates it has always been associated with varied manifestations ranging from angina, acute coronary syndrome, left ventricular dysfunction, arrhythmias, heart blocks and even sudden death. Atherosclerosis preferentially develops immediately proximal to the bridged segment, likely due to alterations in shear stress, while the compressed segment itself is often spared. Based on symptoms and the Schwartz classification, treatment ranges from only reassurance from the treating team (which helps avoid stress, anxiety and depression among the patient and his/her family) to beta-blockers/calcium channel blockers, surgical myotomy, intracoronary stenting or coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Wellens et al.,[4] were the first to report atrioventricular (AV block) associated with myocardial bridge. They described a 35-year-old otherwise healthy young man with paroxysmal infra-Hisian AV block induced by exercise. This patient had a myocardial bridge affecting the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) and major septal arteries with a reversible radionuclide hypoperfusion of the septum during exercise. It was postulated that ischemia of the conduction system due to systolic milking of LAD artery was responsible for the paroxysmal AV block in this patient.

The blood supply to the infranodal conduction system is primarily through the penetrating branches of the LAD artery. This artery usually perfuses the left anterior fascicle and distal right bundle. The left posterior fascicle has a dual supply from the right coronary and LAD arteries. Occlusion of the LAD artery proximally therefore may be associated with right bundle branch block and/or left anterior fascicular block commonly. The finding at angiography of a myocardial muscle bridge causing systolic milking of the coronary artery and an exercise-induced septal defect on thallium stress testing led to the speculation that the muscle bridge produces septal ischemia, possibly resulting in the patient's intermittent heart block. However, the role of myocardial muscle bridges as a cause of ischemia remains controversial and the stress induced perfusion defects could sometimes just be related to baseline left bundle branch block (LBBB).

Lin et al.,[5] in the current issue of this journal report a 51-year-old man presenting with a Mobitz type I (Wenckebach type) AV block coexistent with a myocardial bridge in the mid-portion of the LAD artery. Although the causal association of bridge with presence of Mobitz type I block is supported by its disappearance after bypass surgery, some questions remain in a curious reader's mind. The AV node is the site of Wenckebach type of block and this is supplied by the right coronary artery; hence the ischemia caused by transient LAD artery occlusion, that too in the mid portion, cannot affect AV nodal conduction. However, rarely intra-His Wenckebach has been reported,[6] and this could be the mechanism in the present case. The possibility of age-related intermittent degenerative co-existing conduction disease also needs to be considered. Additionally, the precipitation of symptoms with alcohol intake makes one wonder if the AV block is related to this, as has been documented previously.[7] Also unexplained is the elevated serum troponin I (TnI) at presentation without any obvious infarction. Finally, grafting the distal LAD artery only cannot be expected to reperfuse the septal artery which itself is affected by the bridge.

Myocardial bridges continue to leave us speculate and wonder about their cause, course, manifestations and treatment. In line with Leonardo da Vinci's words, “the greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions”, we continue to form and reform our opinions about the myocardial bridge.



 
 :: References Top

1.
Reyman HC. Disertatio de vasis cordis propriis. Bibl Anat 1737;2:359-79.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Porstmann W, Iwig J. [Intramural coronary vessels in the angiogram]. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed 1960;92:129-33.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Risse M, Weiler G. [Coronary muscle bridge and its relations to local coronary sclerosis, regional myocardial ischemia and coronary spasm. A morphometric study]. Z Kardiol 1985;74:700-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
den Dulk K, Brugada P, Braat S, Heddle B, Wellens HJ. Myocardial bridging as a cause of paroxysmal atrioventricular block. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;1:965-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Lin CC, Lai CH, Lin WS, Lin CS. Severe myocardial bridge presenting as paroxysmal atrioventricular block. J Postgrad Med 2021;67:171-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
6.
Bansal R, Rathi C, Lokhandwala Y. Where is the level of atrioventricular block? Circulation 2020;142:1684-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
van Stigt AH, Overduin RJ, Staats LC, Loen V, van der Heyden MA. A heart too drunk to drive; AV block following acute alcohol intoxication. Chin J Physiol 2016;59:1-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
Online since 12th February '04
2004 - Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Official Publication of the Staff Society of the Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow