Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & EMBASE  
     Home | Subscribe | Feedback  

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
[Download PDF
 
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 53  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 102-107  

Translation and validation of brief patient health questionnaire against DSM IV as a tool to diagnose major depressive disorder in Indian patients

PH Kochhar1, SS Rajadhyaksha2, VR Suvarna2,  
1 Medical Advisor, Pfizer, India
2 Senior Manager, Pfizer, Mumbai, India

Correspondence Address:
P H Kochhar
Medical Advisor, Pfizer
India

Abstract

Context: Depression is frequently encountered in the primary care setting but is often unrecognized and hence untreated. There is a need for a uniform user-friendly screening instrument for depression for primary healthcare personnel in India. Aims: Translation and validation of the brief patient health questionnaire (BPHQ) as a screening tool for depression in major Indian languages. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study conducted at 18 sites, in psychiatric and general clinics. The English version of the BPHQ was translated into 11 Indian languages. The translations were reviewed by experts and volunteers and proofread for the final translated BPHQ. The validation exercise included more than 3000 subjects. A psychiatrist and a psychiatry social worker / coordinator conducted the study under the supervision of the principal investigator. For each language, the presence or absence of major depressive disorder (MDD) as diagnosed with the help of a patient-completed BPHQ and the psychiatrist DSM-IV diagnosis was matched. The kappa coefficient was used as a measure of inter-observer agreement between the two diagnostic methods. Results: Seven languages failed the primary validation exercise. These translations were reviewed and the updated versions, after proofreading were re-run for validation. The self-administered BPHQ was successfully translated and validated for diagnosis of MDD against DSM-IV diagnosis made by a psychiatrist, in English, Hindi, Marathi, Oriya, Malayalam, Assamese, Gujarati, Kannada, Telugu, Bengali and Tamil. Conclusions: BPHQ is a simple, quick and reliable instrument, which facilitates rapid and accurate diagnosis of depression in the primary care setting in our country.



How to cite this article:
Kochhar P H, Rajadhyaksha S S, Suvarna V R. Translation and validation of brief patient health questionnaire against DSM IV as a tool to diagnose major depressive disorder in Indian patients.J Postgrad Med 2007;53:102-107


How to cite this URL:
Kochhar P H, Rajadhyaksha S S, Suvarna V R. Translation and validation of brief patient health questionnaire against DSM IV as a tool to diagnose major depressive disorder in Indian patients. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2007 [cited 2022 Jul 1 ];53:102-107
Available from: https://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2007/53/2/102/32209


Full Text

Mental disorders in primary care though common, are frequently unrecognized and thus go untreated.[1] Studies have explored the clinical presentation of common mental disorders in primary healthcare settings. Among all psychiatric disorders detected in primary care units, depressive and anxiety disorders undoubtedly constitute a large proportion.[2],[3] Patients with depression, particularly those seen by primary care physicians, may report somatic symptoms, such as headache, constipation, weakness or back pain.[4],[5] Some previous studies have suggested that patients in non-Western countries are more likely to report somatic symptoms than are patients in Western countries.[4],[6],[7],[8] Moreover, patients from non-Western cultures and those of lower socioeconomic status are less willing or less able to express emotional distress.[4],[9],[10],[11]

Despite the enormity and increasing awareness regarding psychiatric morbidity, primary care physicians often find themselves unequipped to diagnose and handle depression since they may not be adequately trained.[12],[13] Several screening tools like self reporting questionnaire (SRQ), Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) and Beck depression inventory (BDI) have been studied in Indian patients.[14],[15],[16] Although there have been efforts towards developing screening instruments for common mental disorders in primary care, there is a need for a uniform user-friendly screening instrument to be made available to primary healthcare personnel across most regions in India. The original Prime-MD today (primary care evaluation of mental disorders) questionnaire was accordingly designed as an effective screening tool to assist the primary care physicians.[17] The present study was aimed to provide such a screening tool for depression, by translation of the elements of the brief patient health questionnaire (BPHQ) pertaining to diagnosis of depression, (derived from Prime-MD Today) into various Indian languages and validation against a DSM-IV diagnosis arrived at by a clinical interview conducted by a psychiatrist.

 Materials and Methods



The development of the original Prime-MD Today questionnaire and also the present study in India was funded by Pfizer. The study was conducted by a group of eminent psychiatrists -The Prime-MD study group (principal investigators of the study). The study was conducted at 18 sites, in psychiatric and general clinics. The investigator was responsible for obtaining the Ethics Committee approval at the institution. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject prior to his/her participation in the study. The protocol was developed in consultation with the Prime-MD study group. Pfizer personnel were not involved in the conduct of this exercise. The participating sites are listed in [Table 1].

Inclusion criteria: Patients (age>18 years) presenting with one or more of the following: Tiredness or weakness for > two weeks, multiple aches and pains without any obvious underlying organic causality, sleep disturbance for > two weeks, feeling down or worthless or recent noticeable weight change.

Exclusion criteria: Major medical disease or severe symptoms requiring immediate medical attention, pharmacotherapy which may alter patient's responses, e.g., hypnotics, any psychotropic medication, any cognitive deficits or mental retardation.

The exercise was carried out for the following languages: Assamese, Bengali, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Oriya, Punjabi, Tamil, Telugu and Urdu. The validation was also carried out for the English version of the BPHQ.

Translation: The English version of the BPHQ was translated into Indian languages by experienced translators affiliated to a major translator bureau (Bhasha Bharati). The relevant translation was reviewed by healthcare professionals, including a psychiatrist, familiar with the local language at each site. The questionnaire was also administered to 10 nonpatient volunteers at each site and their input on understandability of language obtained. The site provided comprehensive feedback on the BPHQ which was discussed with the translator and appropriate modifications incorporated into the BPHQ. This was back translated to ensure intact content. This BPHQ was then reviewed and proofread by a different translator for the final translated BPHQ. The translation process is depicted in [Figure 1].

Validation

The validation exercise included approximately 300 subjects for each language. A psychiatrist and a psychiatry social worker / coordinator conducted the study under the supervision of the principal investigator. Subjects presenting to the general / medical and psychiatry outpatient clinics fulfilling the eligibility criteria were selected for further evaluation on obtaining consent. The subjects then completed the BPHQ and their response documented. In the event that the subject was illiterate, the BPHQ was read out to them without any modifications / explanations to the questionnaire. Subsequently they were referred to the study psychiatrists who were blinded to the results of the BPHQ. The psychiatrist conducted a detailed clinical interview and arrived at a DSM-IV diagnosis if relevant. This completed the study requirement for each subject and they were referred to the appropriate clinic for further follow-up or treatment. The BPHQ diagnosis and psychiatrist interview diagnosis were compiled for each subject by the coordinator. The validation process is depicted in [Figure 2].

Statistical analysis

For each language, the presence or absence of a major depressive disorder (MDD) as diagnosed with the help of a patient-completed BPHQ and the psychiatrist DSM-IV diagnosis was matched. Kappa coefficient was used as the measure of agreement between the two diagnostic methods. The kappa statistic measures agreement above and beyond that expected by chance alone. The sample size calculation was based on the measure Kappa for MDD. It was expected that in the selected population of subjects who satisfied the eligibility criteria, the prevalence of depression would be around 50%. Based on the results in the PHQ Primary Care study,[1] it was expected that the Kappa would be around 0.6. To estimate the value of kappa in the population within an error of 0.1 with 95% confidence and 80% power, a sample of size 246 was required for each of the languages considered. To ensure that data for at least 246 subjects would be available, 300 subjects were enrolled for each language.

A Kappa coefficient of 3000 patients.

In the first attempt the validation exercise failed in seven out of 11 languages. On further review and analysis, the following factors were determined to have contributed to the variation in accuracy for various languages. The profile of patients may have contributed to the discrepancy between Kappa values for various languages. The accuracy was higher in languages that were validated in metro cities and this could be due to the awareness and ease of responding to such questionnaires.

Secondly, in terms of the language of the translation, the Hindi and Marathi language translations were reviewed and it was observed that the Hindi translation included qualifiers, which were missing in the English (original) and Marathi version. The language used though technically accurate was complex and sometimes difficult to understand. The BPHQ translations not being simple enough for the local population was a possibility. The language of these questionnaires was modified and simplified while maintaining the integrity and content of the questions.

The BPHQ is simple because patients themselves can fill in the questions. It is quick since the primary care physician (PCP) takes less than three minutes to review the filled-in questionnaire and make a diagnosis of MDD. It is reliable as it has been field tested and validated in more than 3300 patient samples. The result of the validation study shows high sensitivity (ability to detect true positive cases of MDD) and specificity (ability to detect true negative cases of MDD). The entire exercise was accomplished over two years. Subsequently, workshops have been conducted across the country by psychiatrists to train the PCPs regarding the use of the tool.

One of the limitations of this study is the inclusion of patients both from the general OPDs as well as psychiatry clinics. However conducting this exercise exclusively in a primary care setting would have made the logistics for the validation process against a detailed psychiatric interview extremely difficult, thus requiring its conduct in multidisciplinary institutes. Another limitation is lack of using standardized instruments (e.g., SCID or CIDI) for the diagnostic interview. This can be justified on the grounds that the aim of this exercise was to validate this questionnaire against an accepted form of clinical diagnosis in the real world setting by psychiatrists in India. The principal investigators in this study were experienced senior psychiatrists from renowned institutions having academic as well as research backgrounds.

Future research directions could be targeted towards employing this instrument in the field/primary care setting and comparing the results against a standardized diagnostic instrument. Another exercise could be using this instrument to assess the prevalence of MDD in various outpatient settings like diabetic and pain clinics. Moreover, it could also be studied for its utility as a prognostic tool to assess improvement following antidepressant medication over time.

The BPHQ should be administered to patients in whom underlying depression is suspected or to those complaining of recurrent somatic symptoms without any biological basis. The instrument can also be administered to patients with chronic disorders such as stroke, myocardial infarction and diabetes mellitus. It is estimated that MDD exists in 36% of patients with coexistent medical conditions and may be more common in hospitalized and elderly patients.[20]

 Conclusion



The self-administered BPHQ has been successfully translated and validated for diagnosis of MDD against DSM-IV diagnosis made by a psychiatrist, in the following Indian languages: Hindi, Marathi, Oriya, Malayalam, Assamese, Gujarati, Kannada, Telugu, Bengali, English and Tamil. It offers great utility as a brief, simple and effective screening tool for depression in the primary care setting in our country.

 Acknowledgments



This study was sponsored by Pfizer India. The authors wish to thank Mr. Chanderbhan Vasandani for study conduct and Dr. Chitra Lele from Biometrics, Dev Ops Pfizer India for data management, the patients and their relatives. We acknowledge and sincerely thank the investigators of the PRIME MD Study Group for their wholehearted support in the study.

Annexure

PRIME MD Study Group

Dr. Avasthi Ajit, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh; Dr. Banerjee T. K, Clinic M, Calcutta; Dr. Bhagabathi Dipesh, Guwathi Medical College Hospital, Assam; Dr. ChandraKar Gopal, Mental Health, SCB Medical College, Cuttack; Dr. Chowdhury A. N, Institute of Psychiatry, Calcutta; Dr. Ghosal Malay, Medical College and Hospital, Calcutta; Dr. Krishnamurthy, Institute of Mental Health, Hyderabad; Dr. Mehta Manju, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi; Dr. Mondol Dilip, R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Calcutta; Dr. Pai Nagesh, K. S. Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore; Dr. Parkar Shubhangi, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai; Dr. Raju N.N, Institute of Mental Health, Vishakhapatnam; Dr. Sathianathan R, Madras Medical College and Government General Hospital, Chennai; Dr. Sharma P. S. V. N, Kasturba Hospital, Manipal; Dr. Som S. K, Anantagram Hospital, Calcutta; Dr. Tharyan Pratap, Christian Medical College, Vellore; Dr. Trivedi J. K, Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Medical University, Lucknow; Dr. Vankar G. K, B. J. Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad

References

1Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA 1999;282:1737-44.
2Ganguli HC. Epidemiological findings on prevalence of mental disorders in India. Indian J Psychiatr 2000;42:14-20.
3Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Koretz D, Merikangas KR, et al . The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: Results from the National Co-morbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA 2003;289:3095-105.
4Simon GE, VonKorff M, Piccinelli M, Fullerton C, Ormel J. An international study of the relation between somatic symptoms and depression. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1329-35.
5 In : Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Primary care version. APA: Washington, DC; 1995.
6Kleinman A. Neurasthenia and depression: A study of somatization and culture in China. Cult Med Psychiatry 1982;6:117-90.
7Pfeiffer W. The symptomatology of depression viewed transculturally. Transcult Psychiatry Res Rev 1968;5:121-4.
8Bhatt A, Tomenson B, Benjamin S. Transcultural patterns of somatization in primary care: A preliminary report. J Psychosom Res 1989;33:671-80.
9Lerner J, Noy P. Somatic complaints in psychiatric disorders: Social and cultural factors. Int J Soc Psychiatr 1968;14:145-50.
10Katon W, Kleinman A, Rosen G. Depression and somatization: A review. Part I. Am J Med 1982;72:127-35.
11Leff JP. Culture and the differentiation of emotional states. Br J Psychiatry 1973;123:299-306.
12Haar E, Green MR, Hyams L, Jaffe J. Varied needs of primary physicians for psychiatric resources. II. (Subjective factors). Psychosomatics 1972;13:255-62.
13Chowdhury AN, Ghosh S, Sanyal D. Bengali Adaptation of Brief Patient Health Questionnaire for screening depression at primary care. J Indian Med Assoc 2004;102:544-7.
14Sen B, Williams P. The extent and nature of depressive phenomena in primary health care. A study in Calcutta, India. Br J Psychiatry 1987;151:486-93.
15Kishore J, Reddaiah V, Kapoor V, Gill J. Characteristics of mental morbidity in a rural primary health centre of Haryana. Indian J Psychiatry 1996;38:137-42.
16Amin G, Shah S, Vankar GK. The Prevalence and recognition of depression in primary care. Indian J Psychiatry 1998;40:364-9.
17Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, Linzer M, deGruy FV 3rd, Hahn SR, et al . Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care: The Prime-MD 1000 Study. JAMA 1994;272: 1749-56.
18Reus VI. Mental Disorders. In : Braunwald E, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL, editors. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 15th ed. International Edition. Mc Graw Hill: USA; 2001. p. 2543.
19Blacker B. Psychiatry Rating Scales. In : Sadock B, Sadock V, editors. Kaplan and Sadocks' Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. 7th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: New York; 2000. p. 764.
20Leon FG, Ashton AK, D'Mello DA, Dantz B, Hefner J, Matson GA, et al . Depression and comorbid medical illness: Therapeutic and diagnostic challenges. J Fam Pract 2003;S19-33.

 
Friday, July 1, 2022
 Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright  and disclaimer