Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus & EMBASE  
     Home | Subscribe | Feedback  

LETTER
[Download PDF
 
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 60  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 418-419  

Authors' reply

AF Erkan, B Ekici, GG Demir, HF Töre 
 Department of Cardiology, Ufuk University, Ankara, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Dr. B Ekici
Department of Cardiology, Ufuk University, Ankara
Turkey




How to cite this article:
Erkan A F, Ekici B, Demir G G, Töre H F. Authors' reply.J Postgrad Med 2014;60:418-419


How to cite this URL:
Erkan A F, Ekici B, Demir G G, Töre H F. Authors' reply. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2014 [cited 2022 May 25 ];60:418-419
Available from: https://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?2014/60/4/418/143995


Full Text

Sir

We agree with Lohiya RV that diabetes may affect the Duke treadmill score (DTS), and diabetics may have a misleadingly low-risk DTS for any given coronary artery disease burden. [1] Nevertheless, it does not seem probable with our study. There is only a numerical difference between Group I (moderate to high risk DTS) and Group II (low risk DTS) in terms of diabetes, and this difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.399). Furthermore, after adjustment for the presence of diabetes, the relationship of HDL cholesterol with DTS maintained its significance (r = 0.223, P = 0.030). In conclusion, the presence of diabetes should always be taken into account when interpreting the DTS.

References

1Lohiya RV. Duke's treadmill score in diabetics-does it really matter? J Postgrad Med 2014;60:418.

 
Wednesday, May 25, 2022
 Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright  and disclaimer